• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sang Buaya

Leaf on my ball

5 posts in this topic

Can I remove a leaf which is on top of my ball before hitting it without penalty? My ball is in the fairway. Thanks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Can I remove a leaf which is on top of my ball before hitting it without penalty? My ball is in the fairway. Thanks.

If a leaf is not attached to a tree then it is a Loose Impediment.

Loose impediments ’’ are natural objects, including:

  • stones, leaves, twigs, branches and the like,
  • dung, and
  • worms, insects and the like, and the casts and heaps made by them,

provided they are not:

  • fixed or growing,
  • solidly embedded, or
  • adhering to the ball.

So as long as the leaf is not stuck to the ball it may be removed under Rule 23

See this link

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Rule-23/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What constitutes "adhering" to the ball? In a friendly round today, with the leaves starting to fall from the trees and the ground wet from overnight rain, my opponent's ball came to rest on the fairway with a small leaf stuck on it, ie water surface tension was holding the leaf on the ball. It was easy to peel the leaf off without moving the ball, but the leaf would (probably) not have fallen off if the ball had been lifted and gently turned (or even shaken). So could he remove the leaf without penalty? Or should he have played it as it lay? (We allowed him to remove it without penalty. But I am thinking that may have been incorrect. It didn't affect the match anyway.) If there is an issue with removing a wet leaf, how "firmly" attached does it have to be before it cannot be removed? For example, a dry leaf sitting on top can presumably be removed without penalty as a loose impediment. Today's example is probably at the other extreme of "adherence". What about a leaf that is loosely stuck on by water surface tension but would probably fall off if you lifted the ball? Is that in fact the test, ie do you think it would or would not fall off when lifted? Thanks! Matt
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Matt,

Don't overcomplicate this too much.  Adhering means what you think it does.  It's stuck to the ball and would not fall off on it's own.

If you think it might be adhering to the ball, it probably is......leave it alone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How? In what ways? It seems to me someone could easily say Dustin is a great example of the modern golf swing given that he's a very modern athlete and works out and uses his Trackman religiously and so on. Mike Austin never even won a PGA Tour event. Co-opting a good player and saying "they use our swing" is such a marketing gag.
    • What do you mean, specifically? What are the differences between DJ and Rory's swings? 
    • This has nothing to do with the on course rhetoric, it has to do with the botched holes, short putt percentages and inability to corral his drives on a frequent basis. I like him as a player but he is frustrating to watch at times.
    • About 9 mos ago I bought and have been using Mike Austin's lessons ($20).  Of all the teachers I've had or studied in the last 40 years his techniques are the most effective.  In the last 4 years I've gone from a handicap of 6 to not being able to break 90. Now I'm shooting low to mid 80s most of the time. 70s are next. I'm old and have physical problems but drive an average 265 yards.  I had to recalculate all of my clubs because I'm  hitting so much further and my accuracy has greatly improved.  All of this with no pain during or after the round and I play 3 to 5 times a week.   What Austin teaches is the classic golf swing that is not taught today.  Look at the past greats (Byron Nelson for one) and compare their swing with today's greats with the exception of Dustin Johnson.  They're all on Youtube.  Johnson's swing is the closest to Austin's and if you'll notice, Dustin is the longest and most accurate on tour.  I believe he's #1 as well.  Might there be something to this? Look at Rory McIlroy's swing.  Nearly as long as Dustin's but, Rory is already having back problems due to the modern swing, Dustin isn't.  Tiger has just undergone spinal fusion. Another victim of the modern swing.   Before offering an opinion please do some research. You might learn something that will help make you a better golfer longer.
    • We'll agree to disagree. The jury is still a long ways out on Spieth IMO, he potentially has another 20+ years of his career left. My $0.02 is just that there is a difference between being a head case and wearing emotions on your sleeve. The two can be mutually exclusive and I'm sure there are plenty of stoic appearing golfers out on tour who are very much head cases inside...we just don't see it.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (27 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (25 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (55 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon