Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I did some homework and found out that:

1. Swing weight doesn't mean anything if the static weight of the club doesn't allow you to achieve your normal tempo. Let's say, some crazy guy can make a club with a swing weight of D5 but weight 500 grams, now try swinging that, I bet you will feel like its swing weight is off the chart.

2. Swing weight is all about balance, it allows you to feel the clubhead, this confuse me first, but I try hitting the ball with the club holding backward and understand, you need proper balance of the club to swing it properly.

Then again, I find it very very strange that none of the manufacturer that I know of openly state the club weight of their driver on the specs sheet.

Why do I care about this, you may ask. Here's the story...

I'm 5'7", and weight 114lbs, I'm slim, as you can tell from my avatar, and my physically strength is, well, weak. I can hit the irons very good (for a newbie like me) and have great confidence hitting thems, but I can't drive, I just can't. The best I can manage to hit the ball straight is like 180yards, 10 yards further than my 4 hybrid. No matter how hard I try, slow and easy, hard and fast...

Yesterday, I read around the internet and found a thread on another forums, a guy complained about today drivers being too light for him, he need to increase the static weight to around 330 grams to swing properly, then I weight my driver, wow it's 324grams. Earlier, today I went to the driving range and borrow a driver from the pro shop, it's Cobra ZL or something that weight 310 grams (I brought the scale hahaha)

After warming up, I tried some drives, after 3 or 4 slices and hooks, I managed to hit 3 in around that go straight to where I aim, the balls drop right before the 200 yards mark and roll some more.

What I noticed is, my tempo is greatly faster than with my driver, although it is not as fast as with my irons which I feel comfortable with. I then ask to try hitting the Cobra Long Tom, which is 269 grams. Let's not talk about the accuracy, it's a 48" long driver, but my tempo is achieved, or I believed so at least.

Then I leave with a $38 more in the wallet, my old driver is with the pro shop now and I'm looking for another driver that weight around 270-280 grams. Maybe I'll buy something that weight 300 grams, widely available, and then cut it down 1.5" and regrip with Winn Lite 22 grams grip. Same swing weight, save around 30 grams, shorter shaft, and no more confusing about my drives.


Posted
I believe Cleveland makes nice and light drivers.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by fRzzy

1. Swing weight doesn't mean anything if the static weight of the club doesn't allow you to achieve your normal tempo. Let's say, some crazy guy can make a club with a swing weight of D5 but weight 500 grams, now try swinging that, I bet you will feel like its swing weight is off the chart.

If the swing weight is D5 the swing weight is D5. It won't "feel like the swing weight is off the chart."

Your second point kind of invalidates the subject line, no?

At the end of the day, BOTH the swing weight and the static weight matter. My wife's clubs feel light, but the swingweight is still okay.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@Earnest Jones: Thank you for pointing me in the Clevecland Classics direction, but I can't swallow their coloring, black works for me. Also, I'm not sure I can control a 45.75" length driver, I prefer something shorter, If I'm going to shorten the shaft, I'm afraid I can mess up the swing weight/static weight.

@iacas: Yes, you are right, swing weight is very important and should never be "forgot" like the thread title said, I was over exaggerating, hahaha...

I'm looking at the Callaway RAZR X Black driver, which the shop clerk confusingly weight it up for me at 312 grams, stock length is 46" and stock swing weight is D5, I'm hoping that I can lighten it down to around 285 grams at 44.5" length and D2 swing weight by cutting the shaft off 1.5" and replace the stock grip with Winn Lite 25 grams grip. All can be done for free if I purchase the club for $140, I'm tempting.


Posted

MOI is king.

If you cut the Razr X down 1.5", that will lower the SW by 9 points.  You'll gain 5 back with the grip (not really, since the weight is in your hands and behind the 14" fulcrum, but that is what the scale will read.  MOI won't change though.), then you'll end up adding 8g of weight to the head.

I imagine you will dislike the club once that is done.


Posted

If you think total weight is all that matters, flip the club around in your hands and grip it just below the head, swinging the grip. Same weight, same club, but totally awful feel. I somewhat agree though.

I don't put a great emphasis on swingweight, because I would be playing roughly C8 irons if you took it as gospel. Yet, when others try my irons, they generally say they feel heavy with 130g shafts, midsize grips, standard lengths. My old set were over length, light SGI irons that swingweighted to about D3, but feel much lighter.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by glock35ipsc

MOI is king.

If you cut the Razr X down 1.5", that will lower the SW by 9 points.  You'll gain 5 back with the grip (not really, since the weight is in your hands and behind the 14" fulcrum, but that is what the scale will read.  MOI won't change though.), then you'll end up adding 8g of weight to the head.

I imagine you will dislike the club once that is done.

Yes you are exactly right, I have just found out that what I'm trying to do is matching the MOI of my driver to my irons (I thought all irons in the set are the same but I was wrong)

Can you please tell me what is the right way to achieve this? Make the MOI of the driver roundly the same with my irons and shortening the length to 44"-45"?

Or this is a bad idea trying to match MOI of the driver to the irons?

Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

If you think total weight is all that matters, flip the club around in your hands and grip it just below the head, swinging the grip. Same weight, same club, but totally awful feel. I somewhat agree though.

I don't put a great emphasis on swingweight, because I would be playing roughly C8 irons if you took it as gospel. Yet, when others try my irons, they generally say they feel heavy with 130g shafts, midsize grips, standard lengths. My old set were over length, light SGI irons that swingweighted to about D3, but feel much lighter.

No I was over exaggreted in my thread title, is there any way to edit it?


  • Moderator
Posted

fRzzy,

My club fitter, a Golf Digest Top 100, agrees with you that static weight should be a key in fitting.  Swing weight should be balanced throughout the set, but static weight is very important and should be fit to the golfer.

Secondly, don't get down about your physical size.  As you play more, and get better technique, you will hit the ball farther.  You will also get stronger.

Best of luck.

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@boogielicious: thank you for your kind words.

I bought the RAZR X Black yesterday, it's an 46" long 10.5 degrees loft R-flex shaft driver, in stock form it weights 312 grams with a swing weight of D5.

After shorten down to 44.5" and re-grip with Winn Lite 25 grams grip, it's now weight 285 grams (right on my calculation, yay) with a swing weight of D3.5.

I tried to hit a bucket of balls later, after the grip solvent has dried. At first, I was thrilled with the lightness and spraying balls all over the place with crazy tempo (long-drive-championship-fast tempo, haha) but got one go straight as a bullet and hit right on the net at the end of the driving range, I guess that ball can carry at least 230-240 yards.

After a short break, I slowed down to my normal tempo and got very impressive results, 200 yards carry is the norm now. I tried to hit last ten balls as if I'm on the tee box, 3 right on the target, 3 off by 15 yards, 2 off by 30 yards, 2 OB.

And the most important thing is I can hit a bucket of 150 balls, all with my driver, I couldn't do that with my old driver or else I may need to go to the hospital.

Great first impression, I'll report back in a week to see if it last.


Note: This thread is 4741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.