• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
arturo28mx

Iron sets with low bounce

5 posts in this topic

I understand the concept of bounce as it applies to wedges, and why you need less or more bounce depending on the conditions you play in (fluffy sand, etc.).

However, my question applies to iron sets, normally 4 to pitching wedge. More specifically, game improvement iron sets.

I have recently found that some iron sets have very high bounce numbers (such as Callaway Razr X, where a 4 iron has 3 degrees and 7 iron has 5 degrees) and some iron sets have very low bounce numbers (such as Mizuno JPX 825, where 4 iron has -1.5 degrees and 7 iron has 1 degree). They are both supposed to be game improvement irons, so I would assume their bounce numbers would be similar.

Could someone explain why this difference? What kind of player would benefit from one or the other?

I would understand lower bounce numbers in players irons, but in this case both models I mentioned are game improvement irons.

Thanks in advance for your comments

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

The way some companies measure bounce isn't always consistent. I have seen wedges with lots of camber, or a rounded sole from front to back, yet with low bounce numbers. However, if you laid into that wedge and hit down, it would play more effective bounce than a flat one with the same number. But because of the camber, you could lean the handle back without exposing too much bounce either.

There are also some sets with a blunt, or "killed" leading edge, which is effectively a mini bounce surface, yet if the center of the sole is measured it's not taken into account. If you had a narrow high bounce wedge and a wide soled, low bounce wedge, they'd both have similar effective bounce. It's a tricky sort of specification and can hardly be explained in a single number. But it matters more on wedges where it affects the leading edge height, and the head is played from a wider range of angles.

The Mizunos seem to have a lot of heel relief, meant to be played opened slightly perhaps; some sets have soles designed to sit open or closed on the ground throughout the set? That would explain the large variation in the set.They might have also measured the bounce as an average of the whole sole instead of the average of the flat part, which made the number appear lower than the effective playing number.

The Callaways seem to have relief under the leading edge, so they play like high bounce irons. But they might play a lot different if you opened them a bit or leaned the handle back. If they measured just that front part rather than averaging the whole sole, it would yield a higher number.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

The way some companies measure bounce isn't always consistent. I have seen wedges with lots of camber, or a rounded sole from front to back, yet with low bounce numbers. However, if you laid into that wedge and hit down, it would play more effective bounce than a flat one with the same number. But because of the camber, you could lean the handle back without exposing too much bounce either.

Lucius points out some of the factors of rated bounce (measured) vs. effective bounce (how club interacts with turf). Ralph Maltby explains this in a segment on wedges, and you also could apply it also to iron sets.

http://www.ralphmaltby.com/50

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Ralph Maltby article is excellent. I understand better now. Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked the same question to Mizuno, and this is their response:

"Thank you for contacting Mizuno USA.  The reason that the JPX 825 irons have very little bounce is due to the width of the sole.  Typically, the wider the sole, the lower the bounce will be.  This particularly applies to the long irons.  On a wide-soled iron, if you have too much bounce, then the iron would have a chance of literally bouncing off of the turf at impact.  This would be magnified on firmer conditions.  On our MP irons, the bounce is a little higher because the sole widths are much thinner, and are designed to interact with the turf cleaner at impact."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I cannot supply scientific data on the old fashioned knee action.  I have only anecdotal support for it. In my own game focusing on pressure shift in the feet is not a feel that's effective.  Last time out I was not at my best and part of it was focusing on my legs for maybe ten holes probably due in part to this thread.  I was beat down hard by the golfing gods.  They even took away my putting also but threw in good chipping to further screw with me haha! Sadly,  I can only admit I am not as athletic as those golfers with that hyperactive left knee.  It's my theory that this active knee motion contributed something to their action,  perhaps helping their sequencing or power or possibly protecting the spine,  but I can't put forth a good argument based on solid evidence.   The shots of Nicklaus above are fascinating.  It's hard to believe they did that with that unforgiving equipment. Photos like the ones of Nicklaus and Wright are just amazing to me to look at.  How the heck were they able to be so dynamic looking and still crush a tiny headed persimmon driver with a tiny sweet spot/clubface?  It truly boggles my mind.  
    • It's now 8 months since I started playing golf.  I'm fairly happy with the progress I've made so far... ...I've (mostly) got past the impulse to try and whack the ball really hard ...I've (mostly) learned not to overswing and start standing up in the backswing ...I get the concept of the hips starting the downswing rather than the arms, and can see how this causes the club head to rocket through at the bottom of the swing AND I seem to end in a good finish position ...that said, I have also learnt to move my hips at a moderate pace rather than too fast, as that was making me slice it - confused me for a bit but I get it now ...fat shots are now a rarity rather than a constant plague - tend to now only occur on uneven lies but not too often ...I'm not yet as consistent as I would like to be, but I hit the ball cleanish and straight most of the time ...chipping and putting is reasonable compared with my playing partners ...I would expect to get 4 or 5 pars in a round, and mentally before each hole I tell myself a bogey is ok so better to be short of the green with a controlled swing than in trouble with a wild one.  A double bogey or worse is now a disappointment however. I am also starting to get a reasonably good idea of my distances for each club.  What I have noticed, however, is that my distances are much shorter than my friends.  I can hit straight drives about 210 yards, a straight 4 iron about 150 yards, a 7 iron about 120 yards.  Now, I'm ok with this, I'm not bothered about outdriving them or being a big hitter - I know that trying to match them club for club will not end well for me. My question is, will my distances increase as my swing develops and gets more consistent?  Looking at some of the swing speed charts online - for what they're worth - maybe my driver swing speed is around 80mph for those distances?  My irons are Callaway X-16 with new Dynamic Gold R300 shafts.  Are these a heavier shaft, and would I see an improvement with different shafts?  I've no intention of changing them just now, but have my 40th birthday next year so a new set might be on the cards then. I'm really enjoying my golf at the moment, and am quite content with my progress, but the desire to improve is very strong - I guess this happens to a lot of new golfers.  How might I expect things to go from here on?  I've been working it out by myself and with the help of YouTube videos and books, and lessons are not an option - the nearest pro is two hours away. Cheers, Joe
    • Umm, the penalty he took is directly related to that. It would be strange not to emphasize the reason why he took the penalty. 
    • Does anyone have a picture of the pin chart for this course? It's usually on the back of the carts but I can't find it online.  Thanks. 
    • If the fitter did not give you an idea of what shaft you need, you did not get full service.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Adunifon
      Adunifon
      (36 years old)
    2. Mech12
      Mech12
      (42 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon