Jump to content
IGNORED

Concentration and solid contact - Does anyone else "micro-nap" in the swing?


Note: This thread is 4055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am pretty new to the site, and forums in general, so forgive me if this is too wordy, or has been discussed previously...

Like many, I have always struggled with making consistent solid contact...usually hit everything a bit out on the toe, as a general rule.  I just had my third spine surgery, so can't swing a club again just yet, but happened to be on the chipping green and noticed something interesting...not for the first time, but enough that I decided to experiment a bit.

I hope that I am not the only one that notices a "micro-nap" (loss of concentration, brain fart, whatever) between the time I start the downswing and impact.  I usually have a few (too many) swing thoughts going on, and then after I chili-dip a chip, or thin an iron, I notice that "I have no idea what I was thinking about at the ever-important point of impact."  I find that I am not sure if I was actually looking right at the back of the ball, concentrating on hitting down on the ball, in the center of the club-face, etc. exactly at impact.  Basically, my concentration lapses for an instant, right when it matters most...and I am not sure why.

So today on the chipping green (all very short chips because of my back), I practiced with a 60* wedge, which is arguably one of the more difficult clubs to use for chipping (i.e. can lend itself to lots of chili-dips and skulls).  In order to MAKE myself concentrate on the ball from downswing through impact, I simply took the club back as I would do for the particular shot (including lofted shots, lower trajectory to run, etc.), stopped, and held the position for a minimum of "two potatoes."  From there, I made sure that I was looking directly at the back of the ball, and then let my hands drop, accelerated, and finished as normal.

I am sure that this "drill" can be used for a number of reasons, including checking your positioning, working on accelerating through the ball, etc., but I focused on the mental, or "concentration" aspect of the chip, and was quite surprised to see how well I could actually chip from a complete stop - making solid contact, in the center of the club-face, with MUCH better consistency, and a "feel" for what exactly the club-face was doing all the way through impact.  As an "advanced" version of the drill, I would hold my position, and actually look up at the target for two potatoes, then back at the ball before I started the downswing...just to solidify the shot in my mind right before the swinging motion.

I was chipping with 20 balls, and in the 45 minutes prior, I had only holed two shots.  During the drill (six iterations with 20 balls), I holed at least one shot per twenty, and on one lucky round, I holed three out of twenty.  Granted these were all chips inside of 15-20 yards, but there was definite improvement in the stats.  Once I started chipping with no pause (doing this every-other ball), I found that my awareness of the club-face, and my ability to concentrate throughout the shot was much better.  I was able to feel myself "place" the club in a good position at the top, and then had more control on the downswing.

So why am I even writing about all of this?!?  I am just curious to know if others have noticed a similar issue with micro-napping, and if so, what they have done to work specifically on concentration.  Also, I would be curious for someone else to try what I practiced, and see if they are able to see any similar results.  Ultimately, I want to try this with a full swing to see if I can start wearing down the grooves in the center of my clubs, as opposed to "just toe-ward" as usual...but that will be months from now.

Thanks to everyone for a great site and I look forward to hearing any feedback :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

It's an interesting topic, but I will say this and see how others react.

I think what you've found is a good practice routine. Your pausing made you more aware of the weight of the clubhead, its position in 3D space (as well as your body's), and allowed you to better sequence your downstroke.

You'll rarely find a good player playing well who has a thought for the downswing. The best golf is often played with a "micro-nap" from the start of the backswing all the way to the finish - the entire swing.

Or you may have discovered your own simple swing thought for little chips and pitches. I think good players will get a feel for the grass, visualize the shot shape/height/landing/roll-out/etc., and then could close their eyes and still hit that shot because they're attuned to what they're doing.

It helped you because you generally aren't as aware of the clubhead, your body, your tempo/rhythm/sequencing, etc.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Look at Annika Sorenstam, her head is looking out infront, tracing the trajectory of the ball before she impacts the ball. Very few people can actually see impact with the ball.

Your hold technique is good, i've done a similar thing. Were i get the club were i want in the backswing, then focus on other parts of the swing, like bumping my left hip towards the target. As for the mind napping, i think its the fact that the downswing is only 0.2 to 0.5 seconds long. That is basically close to or just slower than an average reaction time. Meaning, once you start down, your done before your body can realize whats its doing.

Though my new favorite drill is make a golf swing like a pendulum, were i start the clubhead forward than back, really get a feel for the weight of the clubhead, slowing increasing the arc. I find this a better way for me to hone in my take away. I tend to rotation my shoulders shallow, drawing me off the ball in the backswing, and i get my hands very deep, but i also rotate the wrists open as well. This momentum drill really helps quiet the swing down and feel the club, and it gets me set on a steeper shoulder turn.

As for chipping, i like to just visualize Erik's video he did on pitching. I find i chip better when i use more of a feel/tempo swing than really focus on mechanics.

My first round of golf, i got up and down over 50% of the time, and that is a stark improvement over my 30/30/30 duff/skull/good chip ratio i had last year :p

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

F22,

I think your practice routine falls directly into what is described in this thread.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/54840/simple-specific-slow-short-and-success-the-five-s-s-of-great-practice

It works because you are slowing down the motion and allowing the sequence to happen correctly. I have done this as well.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would really like to get to the point where my entire swing was a "micro nap".  Sometimes the brain is vastly overrated as any kind of benefit in striking the ball......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Agreed David.  I need to quiet my mind more when I play.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...

I'm glad I found this thread.  I believe that I need to increase my concentration when hitting the ball.  I find myself not focused on the back of the ball when I am swinging and this hurts.  Instead I am looking down but not focused at all and kind of in a "fog" when I hit the ball.  I find that when I force myself to lock into the back of the ball that I make better contact with the ball.  For some reason though I struggle a lot with this.  I always say going into a round that I am going to focus really hard on the back of the ball but after the round is underway I forget about this.  Maybe it's because I am talking with my playing partners or maybe because I play too fast (I think I play way too fast but I cannot help it).

I also noticed that my practice swings are useless basically.  Your practice swing is supposed to be what you want to execute on the actual shot but I have found myself not thinking about this and just making an "empty" practice swing instead.  Maybe I have ADD or something but I have a very hard time making my practice swings count and focusing on the back of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 37: Played 18. Didn’t execute my piece every swing, but when I did the results were solid (8 GIR + 5 nGIR, 79). 
    • Iacas- Can you please post all the data behind field strengths? Thank you very much!
    • New 3W is pretty good  I hit a good drive actually but straight into a headwind so it left me far enough back from the trees to attempt something stupid. So naturally, with a new 3W in the bag, I wanted to see what it could do. Hit a high draw directly over the trees and couldn't see where it ended up from the fairway, but I knew I hit it well. I doubt that's the optimal play for scoring well in the long run but it felt good to do.
    • I'm sure you've read this, but I just have to post it, here, again, for everyone who hasn't. It changed my thinking forever and irrevocably on this exact topic:  "We don't say "the golfers are more talented" today. We say "there are more talented golfers today." "More" meaning they are far more numerous, not more talented. Talent is random. Only a small percentage of people win the talent lottery --- for world class golf, way less than 1%. And there's no telling whether the most talented player of any period, including this one, was more talented than Jack, or Jones, or Vardon. It's absolutely unknowable. What IS knowable, though, is that the base population is larger, so whatever percentage of people are born with golf talent, there are a lot more of them today than there were 50 years ago. What is knowable is that training and coaching is vastly improved. Hogan had to, in his words, "dig his swing out of the dirt" by hitting millions of golf balls. Today, they have radar and laser and the Minolta super duper high speed swing cam, and they know exactly how every little swing tweak affects their spin rate and launch angle and apex height -- stuff nobody had any clue about in Jack's day. So 50 years ago, if you had 100 guys born with golf talent take up golf, maybe 30 of them would find their optimal swing. Today, it's probably over 90. What is knowable is that the huge purses, and the fact that Tiger was the world's richest and most famous athlete, and not just the world #1 golfer, is making golf the first choice of more young athletes, rather than just the guys who couldn't make the "real" sports teams in school. So if you had 100 guys born with multi-sport talent 50 years ago, most of them played golf for fun, if at all. Today, a lot more of them concentrate on golf as their main sport. And what is knowable is that travel is much faster and cheaper now, so almost every world class player shows up for almost every major and WGC, and for many of the regular PGA events. 50 years ago, the second or third best player in, say, Australia, often didn't even play in the British Open, let alone a PGA event. So all the PGA events, and three of the four majors, had only a handful of international players, and the fourth major had only a handful of Americans. None of that is speculation. It is a verifiable fact that there are over twice as many people in the world today than there were 50 years ago. It's a verifiable fact that the purses today are hundreds of times as high as they were 50 years ago --- Tony Lema got about $4200 for winning the 1964 Open; today, it's about $3.5 million. It's a verifiable fact that virtually all the world top 100 play every major they are eligible for, instead of only a handful playing any events that require overseas travel. It's not knowable exactly how all of that combines, but a good indication is the number of entries in the US Open. To enter the US Open requires both top 1% talent for the game, and a serious commitment to it. There were about 2400 entrants per year 50 years ago. This century, it's consistently over 9000, well over three times as many. It's true that, mostly because of the time and expense, the number of duffers recreational players has declined, but they never had any influence on field strength, anyway. High school kids on the golf team still play all they want, for free. What do you have to counter that? Nothing but your belief that there were half a dozen golf phenoms all at the same time in the 60's, and none today, now that Tiger's past his prime. You're entitled to that opinion, but what facts do you have to back it up? Only the number of majors they won. But how many majors would Phil have won if the fields were like they were 50 years ago? Mickelson finished second in the US Open to Goosen in 2004, to Ogilvy in 2006, and to Rose last year. 50 years ago, odds are that none of those guys would have even tried to qualify for the US Open, since it required shutting down their schedule for a minimum of three weeks to travel to the US for sectional qualifying, with no guarantee that they would make it into the actual tournament. Michael Campbell, who beat Tiger with some amazing putting down the stretch in 2005, said that he would not have entered that year if the USGA hadn't established overseas qualifying sites, so he didn't have to travel to enter. How would Phil look next to Arnie with those three US Opens? Eight majors, and a career Grand Slam. And how would Tiger look if Michael Campbell, Trevor Immelman, Angel Cabrera, and YE Yang had stayed home, like most international players did in the Jack era? I'll make it even simpler for you, since you follow women's golf. How much better would the US women look today, if there were no Asians on tour? Or even just no Koreans? Well, it looks like you're going to crow about the lack of current talent every time a guy backs into a win for the foreseeable future, but come on. The Valero was a 40-point tournament, which makes it one of the weakest regular PGA events, barely above the John Deere Classic. And the tournament committee knows that most top players don't like to play right before a major, so they try to attract the few who do by making it as close to major conditions as possible, to help them fine tune their games. A weak field facing a tough setup is not a recipe for low scores, but you still insist on taking one bad week and comparing it to the majors of your hazy memory, even though you seem to have forgotten epic collapses by the likes of Arnie, who managed to lose a seven shot lead over the last 9 holes of the 1966 US Open. And who knows how often something like that happened in a low-rent event? I don't know if Tiger was more talented than Jack, or even Trevino. All I know is that there are many solid reasons to believe that in order to win a tournament, he had to beat around three times as many talented golfers, even in most of the regular tour events he's won, as Jack did in a major --- especially the Open, where Jack only had to beat as few as 8 other Americans, at a time when probably 60-70 of the world top 100 were Americans.  I don't say it's true by definition, as you claimed, but I say it's the way to bet, based on facts and logic."  
    • Shot 50/41 today. I didn't hit the ball particularly well but not as poorly as the score would indicate. I just happened to hit it in some really punishing places that wound up taking one or two strokes just to hit back into play. The undergrowth and the fescue are really growing in at the course. Lipped out and burned a few edges on putts, too. I always say when I miss putts by that small a margin that they're eventually going to drop as long as I don't deviate from the process and that's exactly what started happening on the back 9. I ended up making a couple of mid-length putts. Five over on the back included a triple bogey on 17.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...