Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4596 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've been playing the TP3 balls since last season but I know they've taken them out of the line and have a bunch of new options. Which ball in their line is the closest to a direct replacement. Before the TP3 I was playing hex chrome's and e6. I loved the chromes but I hate the price... The TP3 played the closest feel wise to me at a significantly lower cost. Are there other options I should look at in the $20-25/dozen price point?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Pretty sure the replacement ball is RocketBallz urethane 3 piece. You might want to try Bridgestone e5, a 2 piece ball with urethane cover. June edition of Golf Digest has a comparison of balls across all price points. e5 spin rates are similar to many higher priced tour balls. Maybe worth taking a look, lots of other suggestions as well in your price point, give or take a couple bucks.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted

TM is kind of driving me crazy with their golf balls.  Yes, the rocketnutz ball is the new replacement for the TP3.  But also every year they change their golf balls.  On the top end they had the black and red balls, the Penta, then the Penta TP5, and now Lethal .  It just gets a bit old after a while.  I still play the Penta but it gets hard to keep up with all the changes.  I will probably switch at some point to a ball that stays around for a while.  If you want a good replacement for theTP3 that will stick around the e5 is a good option.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by cipher

TM is kind of driving me crazy with their golf balls.  Yes, the rocketnutz ball is the new replacement for the TP3.  But also every year they change their golf balls.  On the top end they had the black and red balls, the Penta, then the Penta TP5, and now Lethal .  It just gets a bit old after a while.  I still play the Penta but it gets hard to keep up with all the changes.  I will probably switch at some point to a ball that stays around for a while.  If you want a good replacement for theTP3 that will stick around the e5 is a good option.

They are a marketing company that makes golf equipment.  I'd expect the RocketBalls and Lethal names to stick around for a while as those are in line with their new branding efforts.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

They are a marketing company that makes golf equipment.  I'd expect the RocketBalls and Lethal names to stick around for a while as those are in line with their new branding efforts.

But wasn't Taylormade and Gary Adams the company and owner who first manufactured a metal club?

I'd say TM is a golf company that markets well. They don't do everything well (i.e., wedges, irons), or push the envelope to the edge, but they are right behind it in terms of technology. Occasionally, they get bold - white clubs, tatooed, and moveable weighted clubs - but they have real science behind it. They make a splash. Now just because some people don't buy into the science does not mean it doesn't exist. Some people refuse to see it or don't like its looks ... but the science, even if exaggerated, still exists.

I prefer Callaway and what they do with their technology - I believe they take it from the Japanese and expand on it, ie., cup face technology in woods, springier (thinner) iron faces - it's proven technology. I hope they expand cup face to the driver line.

And the replacement for the TP3 - the RBZ Urethane - supposedly, a bit less spin, more launch than TP3. Some mentioned the e5 - I've tried the original, and the latest - it's just okay - a little firmish, some say it is short. For a few dollars more, on sale, I like the HEX Chrome if you want launch and more spin, and spin around the greens (urethane). Haven't tried the TP3, although it was selling for peanuts recently on tgw.com.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't play them regularly but I do like the Bridgestone e6 in that price range. For me, they have a decent feel around the green and are fairly long off the tee without being too pricey.

 


Note: This thread is 4596 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.