Jump to content
IGNORED

Beginner advice needed on selecting a full set of new clubs


Note: This thread is 3975 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Thanks SolarBear.

Yes, I'm definitely learning a lot in this process and enjoying it all too! My wife often tells me that I tend to enjoy the 'hunt' more than the goal or the endpoint, and I think she's probably right on that score. I do enjoy the pre-purchase research that goes into such an adventure, and there's no doubt that it can yield some dividends. When I was a younger man, I didn't bother to put much research into things before I bought them, and as a result, I stepped in a few puddles along the way, so I consciously approach things a little bit differently these days.

Anyway, this week ended-up being busier than expected, so I still haven't gotten a proper fitting, but I'm looking forward to getting it done this weekend or early next week, and I believe I'm getting closer and closer to the right choice of irons. None of the local dealers have the actual clubs (or heads) in-stock, and they're probably still considered by most to be a tad too far in the GI/Player direction for a beginner like me, but I'm leaning towards the Mizuno MP-53s. A young neighbor friend of mine (16-18 handicapper) has a full set, and although they seemed a bit short for me, I hit 100+ balls with them yesterday at the driving range and they felt pretty sweet - good-looking club too! I didn't care for the PW much, but I've already got a set of three (46/08, 52/08, 58/12) Vokeys, so if I go with the MP-53s, I'll probably just get 4-9 or maybe even 5-9.

Anyway, my neighbor has graciously agreed to let me take a couple of them with me to the golf shop when I go in for the fitting, just in case they want me to use them there in the fitting process somehow. They're apparently still being made by Mizuno and available via custom order, but they're a 'cavity-back' (which is good), and the young man who owns this set doesn't seem to think they're overkill for me, so who knows? I guess I'll see what the guys at the golf shop all say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And frankly, that raises yet another key question that I forgot to ask earlier . . .

If a guy's irons are all supposed to be custom fitted with respect to length, shouldn't his wedges also be custom fitted for added length? I'm being told 'no' by virtually everyone I've asked. In fact, I've been told repeatedly that regardless of their skill level or their personal dimensions/measurements, most players simply buy standard length wedges right off the shelf, but something about this just doesn't seem logical to me. For example, if a proper fitting leads to the conclusion that you need irons customized to +1" added length, I would have thought that you would need +1" on your wedges as well. Can someone address this topic for me?

Many thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Watermark

And frankly, that raises yet another key question that I forgot to ask earlier . . .

If a guy's irons are all supposed to be custom fitted with respect to length, shouldn't his wedges also be custom fitted for added length? I'm being told 'no' by virtually everyone I've asked. In fact, I've been told repeatedly that regardless of their skill level or their personal dimensions/measurements, most players simply buy standard length wedges right off the shelf, but something about this just doesn't seem logical to me. For example, if a proper fitting leads to the conclusion that you need irons customized to +1" added length, I would have thought that you would need +1" on your wedges as well. Can someone address this topic for me?

Many thanks

Mine are all longer than standard, however, they don't have the exact same added length.  My longest iron is a 4 iron and it is 1 1/4" longer than standard and 3 degrees upright from standard.  My shortest club is my lob wedge which is only 1" long and 1.5* upright.

So if you needed 1" extra on your long irons, you may only need 3/4" or 1/2" on your shorter irons, but I'd say it's likely you'd need something extra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

So if you needed 1" extra on your long irons, you may only need 3/4" or 1/2" on your shorter irons, but I'd say it's likely you'd need something extra.

Ah-ha! That makes more sense to me, but I wonder why I've been told otherwise by so many sales people? Very weird. I knew in my heart the second I heard it that it didn't sound quite right, and it seemed to be confirmed when I tried out a couple of display putters - I felt way more comfortable with a couple of Odyssey putters as long as 38"-39" than I did with any of the standard length (32"-33") putters made by others.

Oh well! Sounds like I'll need to take my three new Vokey wedges with me when I go in for the fitting, so that I can have them fitted with the proper length shafts too. Boy, this little proposition is startin' to get pretty deep! ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3975 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...