Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4522 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Which do you go by more??

I ask this because a while ago i was looking at a article that had the top 50 toughest courses in america...

So i started looking at some of the Championship courses that the PGA guys play on..  And compared it to my home course..

My home course

Slope  141

Rating 73.7  / par 71

Yardage 6900 ( from the tips )

Oak Hills

Slope -  147

Rating - 76.7 / par 70

yardage - 7145

Muirfield

Slope - 145

Rating- 73 / par 71

yardage- 7245

Bethpage Black

Slope - 152

Rating - 78.1 / par 71

yardage -  7468

Torrey Pines South

Slope - 143

Rating - 78.1

yardage - 7607

It is what it is

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ehh,

You go by both. Course Rating is difficulty compared to a scratch-player. A scratch player gets 2 strokes on a par 72 when CR = 74.

High slope = you get more shots extra compared to your handicap. So when slope is high, a 10 capper gets (as an example) 11 strokes, but a 20 capper gets 24 strokes. The higher the slope the more extra shots compared to your handicap.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

The better the player the more they rely on rating. The worse the player the more the slope starts to matter (still in conjunction with rating: a 69.8/141 course is probably still "easier" than a 72.1/137 course).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Are you asking how to determine which course is toughest overall?

If so, while there's no single number that will tell us that one course is harder than another, MacDutch is right, you really have to look at a combination of the course rating and slope to evaluate overall difficulty.  The easiest way to do that is to compare the handicap differential you would achieve for any given score for the two courses.

As an example......

If you were to shoot a 90 at your home course, it would result in a handicap differential of 13.0 ( (90-73.7) x 113) / 141.  If you were to shoot the same 90 at Oak Hill, the handicap differential would be 10.2.  Since the same score results in a lower differential, Oak Hill is the harder course overall .....

It's worth noting though that since your course handicap is based only on the slope of the course, it's possible that a player will actually have a higher course handicap at a course that's somewhat less difficult overall than another because the slope at the less difficult course is higher, as in Erik's example.

BTW....in terms of difficulty.  If you were to play bogey golf from the tips at Bethpage Black, averaging 89, you would end up with a handicap index of 8.1.  Beware the guy that tells you he's a bogey golfer but doesn't tell you where it is that he plays bogey golf.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

The better the player the more they rely on rating. The worse the player the more the slope starts to matter (still in conjunction with rating: a 69.8/141 course is probably still "easier" than a 72.1/137 course).

Here is a chance for me to learn something maybe.  For some reason I have always thought that the course rating was mostly influenced by the length of the course from the various tees, whereas the slope is a function of the difficulty additions like narrowness of fairways, sand trap placement & design, tricky greens, type of rough, elevation changes, likely hood of a level lie in the fairway and etc.  The slope, at least in my mind would be a more subjective measure of difficulty than the rating.  Am I correct or way off base on how these two measurements are developed?

Butch


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by ghalfaire

Here is a chance for me to learn something maybe.  For some reason I have always thought that the course rating was mostly influenced by the length of the course from the various tees, whereas the slope is a function of the difficulty additions like narrowness of fairways, sand trap placement & design, tricky greens, type of rough, elevation changes, likely hood of a level lie in the fairway and etc.  The slope, at least in my mind would be a more subjective measure of difficulty than the rating.  Am I correct or way off base on how these two measurements are developed?

As I said, slope is a better measure of the difficulty of a course for a bogey golfer (with some allowance for rating).

Length is one of the influences, but a scratch golfer is still going to have more difficulty on a tight, narrow, tree-lined, course with undulating, fast greens and plenty of OB and water hazards than they are from the same length course that's flat and wide open with large, flat greens.

Course ratings take all of those things into account. Length might be one of the biggest factors, but it's nowhere near the only factor.

Consider the blue tees at Downing (7100 yards, 73.1/129) with the black tees at Whispering Woods (6750 yards, 74.0, 144). Full "shot" difference, 15 point difference in rating, 350 yards shorter.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4522 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.