• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
amac

Shopping for a new 3W and have a few questions.

11 posts in this topic

Last weekend I swung an Adams SpeedLine 3W and then compared it to my i15 3w. I consistenly swung the Adams 5mph faster. The launch monitor showed between 10-15 yards more carry. I didn't feel 100% comfortable with the shaft flex and or setup of the club. But, fast swing speed and further launch can't be overlooked. I need all the xtra yards I can get! I didn't purchase that club, but it has me looking. I don't trade out clubs frequently, but I am assuming technology over the last 2-3 years has improved club head speed and increased distance of drivers and fairway woods. So, is an upgrade imminent? I am considering Calaway and Taylormade 3W's and am wondering what others would recommend? Is the Taylormade Rblz Stage2 Tour the same thing as the Adams? Anyone have experience with the XHot? Open to suggestions. Thanks amac
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Originally Posted by amac

Last weekend I swung an Adams SpeedLine 3W and then compared it to my i15 3w. I consistenly swung the Adams 5mph faster. The launch monitor showed between 10-15 yards more carry. I didn't feel 100% comfortable with the shaft flex and or setup of the club. But, fast swing speed and further launch can't be overlooked. I need all the xtra yards I can get! I didn't purchase that club, but it has me looking. I don't trade out clubs frequently, but I am assuming technology over the last 2-3 years has improved club head speed and increased distance of drivers and fairway woods. So, is an upgrade imminent? I am considering Calaway and Taylormade 3W's and am wondering what others would recommend? Is the Taylormade Rblz Stage2 Tour the same thing as the Adams? Anyone have experience with the XHot? Open to suggestions. Thanks amac


How far do you hit your current i15 3W?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On the course, I'd say it rolls out about 225-230ish. The launch monitor clocked chs at 85 with my 3w and 90 with the Speedline. The monitor was set up for a driver, so I'm not sure how that would affect accuracy. I'd like to see 240 with my 3w. : )
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by amac

On the course, I'd say it rolls out about 225-230ish. The launch monitor clocked chs at 85 with my 3w and 90 with the Speedline. The monitor was set up for a driver, so I'm not sure how that would affect accuracy. I'd like to see 240 with my 3w. : )


I guess at your handicap, you are trying for those birdies and eagles on par 5?

When I tested the RBZ 3W, I did get "17 yards" more distance on the monitor as compared to my old Diablo. Both have Stiff shaft the RBZ was the "Tour" model. However, I don't use a 3W, because I hit hybrids more reliably (though shorter).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thinking more about position off the tee and it's what I hit on shorter P4's. Ten more yards = one LESS club! 17 more yards would be a club and a half. I am looking at the Stage 2 Tour. Is that what you hit?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three FWs to consider:

  • Callaway X.Hot family: Really hot face; solid feel with various PX graphite shafts. Gets ball up w/o ballooning, usually longer than RBZ-2
  • Tour Edge Exotics family: XCG (lower profile) and CB (penetrating ball light); get last year's models to save $100 (I bought Exotics game-improvement model XRail in 4W and 7W; have hit some wonderful shots!)
  • TM RBZ Stage 2 family: Have lower profile heads than original RBZ, get ball up better. Has heavier shaft in basic Stage 2; original RBZ had too-light shaft

Many people hit the Adams FWs well at recent demo day; just didn't excite me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by amac

Thinking more about position off the tee and it's what I hit on shorter P4's. Ten more yards = one LESS club! 17 more yards would be a club and a half. I am looking at the Stage 2 Tour. Is that what you hit?


Possibly, I was not shopping for a 3W, but thought it would be fun to see if the claims were true or not. They were, but I like what I have for my "learning phase". My son might consider it. He also tested it with similar results.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Callaway X.Hot family: Really hot face; solid feel with various PX graphite shafts. Gets ball up w/o ballooning, usually longer than RBZ-2

Tour Edge Exotics family: XCG (lower profile) and CB (penetrating ball light); get last year's models to save $100 (I bought Exotics game-improvement model XRail in 4W and 7W; have hit some wonderful shots!)

TM RBZ Stage 2 family: Have lower profile heads than original RBZ, get ball up better. Has heavier shaft in basic Stage 2; original RBZ had too-light shaft

Many people hit the Adams FWs well at recent demo day; just didn't excite me.

Good info. I saw you post similar clubs in another thread. My local shop is suggesting the X Hot's. In your assessment, are all X Hot's generally longer than Stage 2 Tour, or is there a specific model you're referencing? The Tour Edge Exotic's seem pricey. I like last year's model for the price break. Soo many blowout sales right now, makes me think new clubs are on the way.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hit a friend's new 3w RBZ (with that compression slot,...like the Adams woods).  It felt GREAT to hit.  Much like my Nike VR Pro's (has a compression channel in the same location as the slots on the other clubs).  Even sounded the same.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Bought my 3 wood today!  I went in to my local Edwin Watts and hit the Callaway X hot, X Hot Pro, TM Rblz Stage 2 and Stage 2 Tour.  I compared all these to my existing i15 3 wood.  First, I concluded that not all monitors are the same.  This monitor clocked my swing speed 5 mph faster than another local golf store.  According to the EW store monitor, I was swinging my Ping 90 mph.  I swung the TM 95-97 mph!  That's quite a difference from the 85mph recorded at the other store.

Anyway, for those looking, I strongly suggest testing as many different clubs as possible.  I didn't like the feel of the Callaway X Hot.  The X Hot Pro felt a little better and I produced decent results.  The TM Stage 2 Tour was too flat - 13* - but is adjustable.  I didn't ask the guy to adjust the loft because I was smashing the TM Stage 2 15*.  The sound difference between these two clubs is easily noticeable.  Depending on what you like, the Callaway is a low thud, while the TM produces a higher pitched ping/crack noise.  Personally, I liked the feel of the flex in the TM shaft better than the Project X Stiff in the Callaway.  Both Pro models had 10 gram heavier shafts and that did slow my swing speed by 2-4 mph.

In the end, I was most consistent with the TM Rocketballz Stage 2 with Stiff shaft.  I don't know anything about the "Rocketfuel" Matrix shaft, but it works with my swing.  The club sets up very square for me and the white head isn't as awkward as I feared.  I consistently hit it 220 + and clocked 95mph + swing speeds.  I am playing in a golf tournament this weekend and can't wait to bring this club to the course.  I post some reports after this club has hit the course a few times.  Thanks for the feedback.

amac

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The X.Hots went about 10 yards longer than the RBZ.Stage 2, in comparing Pro vs. Tour, and standard vs. standard. This was off grass in the outdoors. Also, the X.Hots had more consistent launch. (Pro vs. Tour was mostly stiff shafts, heavier than what I would hit. I would probably order a standard R.flex if I selected a Pro or Tour head.)

Tour Edge has a Pre-Owned section on their web site. Some of the FWs a couple of years old are below $200, and still in great shape. Go online and find a shop that carries TE, and then go test-hit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • From this, it actually looks like he gets the club back on plane through impact. This is wild.
    • That's an exaggeration. He's obviously shown that he has the potential to compete but he struggles with consistency month to month. I think everyone who watches golf underestimates just how rare it is to have back to back seasons as the likes of Tiger, Jack, or Arnold- especially in a field as talented as it is in 2016. I'm a huge believer that these past few seasons have been some of the best tour golf ever played in the history of the game, especially when it's looked at in terms of depth. Week to week, it's really anyone's tournament to take, and it hasn't always been like that.
    • Trump paying out the $1M to a wealthy individual is a non-story.  The entire story is a non-story, I haven't seen it mentioned on any of the news channels and beyond a cut and paste no one else is covering it.  If this was something the democrats or liberal media really thought could hurt Trump we'd be hearing about it constantly.  No one cares when rich guys get into a dispute, there's no damage control to be done here. The real reason it's even in the news is because Trump's charity (not his golf course) paid out money to Greenberg's charity and it was a potential inappropriate use of the charity funds.  
      I'm guessing those that voted Trump should pay are basing this off their general dislike for Trump or his platform as a POTUS candidate.  Anyone who read the facts and didn't have a bias against Trump would conclude paying off Greenberg was not Trump's responsibility.  
    • Genetics definitely play a role, but not as much as people think. If you have a 6 foot frame to work with from the get-go, you will obviously be able to make a bigger swing with less effort than someone who stands 5 feet tall with shorter arms. A bigger swing path = more time to gain momentum through impact. This is where technique and flexibility come into play, though. Having a large frame/swing only correlates to distance if you can do two things, 1) swing at a high rate of speed through the slot, 2) maintain a square club face on impact. I am not a tall or big person by any means, but I gain a lot of my strokes by being able to hit a wedge or low iron into the majority of holes I play. The biggest adjustment to my game that I made in order to hit the long ball has been working on my shoulder flexibility as well as timing my hip turn. If you are a smaller person and want to improve distance, you should first make sure you are able to hit the ball squarely, but after, elongate the path of your lead arm without compromising your spine alignment and swing plane. It definitely isn't something that happens in one range session as it oftentimes takes multiple seasons in order to find 15-25 yards from the tee. But genetics definitely are not the only thing that factor into hitting big drives, I would say it is much more contingent on technique and timing than anything else.  
    • Actually it is not. It's taking something that people will perceive is bad associated with you, your brands and your business as Trump and making sure it doesn't affect you negatively. People saying it's not his fault and would be bad business are failing to see the big picture. He generates so much money off of his name and reputation and brand that if something is associated with him negatively, wrong or right, it could have already cost him far more than a million dollars of revenue or EBITDA.  And this was another executive  not sure I want the word on street to be that I didn't make good for another CEO. It's the same reason why when Chik Fil A made a statement about gay marriage they also were outside handing out free bottles of water to protesters. And their sales went even higher!  They controlled the message and paid for it and what happened?  They came out winners. There are multiple examples of this in business. That's why I disagree with @iacasand with @newtogolf  And apparently over 70 percent of the voters on this poll agree.  Ultimately we can have our own opinions on it and that's mine. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (51 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (24 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (38 years old)
  • Blog Entries