Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What happens to these people?


Note: This thread is 4477 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yani Tseng, a huge winner 2 years ago,  starts the final round yesterday  ahead by 3. She shoots 78 and ties for 12th.  Last week Kuchar starts the final round ahead by 3 and shoots 77. Rory can't find the hole this year and quickly slides away from top spot. Duval on top of the world and collapses, never to contend again. I mean i could find many examples but seems to me either something happens in either the body or the brain of these folks. Now we know the body gets old and stiff so no one expects Vijay to win again but young folks who have great skills 'should' be more consistent. What happens?


Posted

Maybe they just become content with making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year playing high level events and don't really care about winning majors.


Posted

I don't follow LPGA so I can't comment on that.

Kuch just had a bad round I think - although he also had an awful final rnd at the PGA.  But for the last couple years the dude has been Mr Consistent.

Duval it was an injury problem.  He has had back issues since his game started to go away and vertigo.  I don't think  it's a case that his game went anywhere - his health is not allowing that game to come out and will never let it out again.  He simply doesn't have the body anymore.

Rory needs to put more effort and focus into his golf and he'll be right back to where he was.  I hate the way all these top 10 players take practically EVERY week off except for WGC and Majors.  It's why I like guys like Zach Johnson - well known, very good player who plays practically every week, even the smaller tournaments that the majority of the field is no name players.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86


Posted
Originally Posted by joekelly

but young folks who have great skills 'should' be more consistent. What happens?

Why should they be more consistent?

When a player loses a bit of confidence it makes a difference. It doesn't matter how old or young they are.

In fact, the young ones will have a lapse because you build up a memory bank of missed putts and bad shots over months and years.

At first there's nothing to lose and everyting to gain. McIlroy had to deal with the expectations of others, as well as his own.

And.....a couple of shots a round is the diffeence between making cuts and being in the top few on Sunday evening.

Look at Henrik Stenson lately - a perfect example.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

The LPGA has plenty of cases of players who are the next big thing for 3-9 months and then fall away from prominence. Very few can contend for years at a time.

I am constantly amazed that players in both the mens and womens tours can be so consistent week in week out and then follow a 65 with a 75 the next day. Is it a bad nights sleep, sickness or just bad luck?

I guess this is what make golf great, just when you start to think it is getting easier you have a shocker and have to work hard again.

:powerblt: Air force one complete set

:powerblt: TPS Putter

:oakley: Shirts

:footjoy: shoes


  • Moderator
Posted

Yani had an injury and changed her swing to compensate.  Now she has trouble being as accurate as before.  Similar things happen to many other players, Woods for example.  Rory changed clubs.  I think that makes a big difference.  He has also lost a bit in the putting game.  Not sure why.  That makes a huge difference.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Shorty

Why should they be more consistent?

When a player loses a bit of confidence it makes a difference. It doesn't matter how old or young they are.

Exactly. There's a fine line between contending and packing up on Friday night and going home.

In golf there's no place to run and no place to hide and no teammates to pick up the slack.

I wonder how tough it would be to get out of a slump if a baseball player had to go home without a check on Friday if he went 0 for 4 on Thursday.


Posted

Maybe it is the same thing that happens to me  One day I go out and everything is great and I shoot an 84.  The very next day I go out and can't hit the ball solidly to save myself and I shoot 94.

Maybe the thing to marvel at is not the inconsistency of the folks mentioned in this thread, but to reflect on what that struggle says about guys like Jack and Tiger who play at an impossibly high level for an impossible length of time.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I believe these sudden collapses have to be mental other than those that clearly come from injury.  There just doesn't seem to be any other conclusion when someone so dominate as Yani Tseng goes from #1 to a "not in the discussion" almost overnight.  Her most recent (Labor day weekend) performance of a third round 63 followed by a final round 78 is just unexplained by anything other than the mental side of the game (reaction to pressure/unrealistic expectations, etc.).  So there it is and it is the same as when I go out an fire a 82 one day and on the next struggle to stay under 95.  "Who know what lurks in the minds of men?".

Butch


Posted
Originally Posted by turtleback

Maybe it is the same thing that happens to me  One day I go out and everything is great and I shoot an 84.  The very next day I go out and can't hit the ball solidly to save myself and I shoot 94.

Maybe the thing to marvel at is not the inconsistency of the folks mentioned in this thread, but to reflect on what that struggle says about guys like Jack and Tiger who play at an impossibly high level for an impossible length of time.

I think this is what anyone who knows this game well will take away from it.

Nike Covert 2.0 10.5* with Fujikura Motore F3 Stiff Flex
Nike Covert 2.0 3 Wood 15* Kuro Kage X-stiff 71g
Nike Covert 2.0 21* 3 hybrid Kuro Kage X-stiff 85g
Nike VR Pro Combo CB 4--PW
Nike VR Pro forged 50, 56, 58
Scotty Cameron Newport 2.5


Note: This thread is 4477 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.