Jump to content
IGNORED

Question about hybrid offset


Note: This thread is 3760 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I play an adams 23* hybrid which has pretty much 0 offset. I built my wife an adams clone from diamond tour golf, which has a face offset much like a fairway wood, with the top line at 0, and the bottom of the face in front of the shaft.

My course has 2 holes which are ideal for a 17 - 19* hybrid, and I can get that same clone in 19*, but that offset or lack there of is concerning me. It's winter here so I can't go and hit it...

Can someone please explain to me the whole offset thing as it relates to this hybrid design?

Thank you,

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites


As a follow up to my question....

I play a blade with 0 offset and thin top line, however I am considering going back to my set of X20's which are a compact cavity back with blade profile and 0 offset.

My hybrids will be going on the same shafts as my irons for consistency sake as they will replace my 2 and 3 irons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Offset helps you to hit the ball higher and gives you more time to close the face.  IMO, most people would benefit from offset, unless you hit the ball too high and your miss is a pull or hook.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm surprised that you have X20s with 0 offset. I thought even the X20 Tour had a millimeter or two.

I agree with Gaijin Golfer that offset is most golfer's friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks... but let me re-phrase this a bit.

My X20's are pretty much 0.... you are right...

QUESTION: I have an Adams hybrid with the top line that is even with the shaft, and the bottom of the face is AHEAD of the shaft. I also have an Adams with the top line just behind the shaft, and the bottom of the face is flush with the shaft. - Why is there a difference in the face design, and what is the effect?

Is one hybrid designed like an iron and the other like a fairway wood?

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks... but let me re-phrase this a bit.

My X20's are pretty much 0.... you are right...

QUESTION: I have an Adams hybrid with the top line that is even with the shaft, and the bottom of the face is AHEAD of the shaft. I also have an Adams with the top line just behind the shaft, and the bottom of the face is flush with the shaft. - Why is there a difference in the face design, and what is the effect?

Is one hybrid designed like an iron and the other like a fairway wood?

Tony


I'm no expert on the offset on hybrids or fairway woods. I have two cheap hybrids that I bought a while back just to see if I liked them and both fall just about in between the description of yours. Shaft just ahead of the top edge and just behind the bottom edge.

I figure you just have one club with a lot of offset and another one without any. But that's just a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks... but let me re-phrase this a bit.

My X20's are pretty much 0.... you are right...

I'm not surprised you're unsure of the offset - Callaway usually omits offset from specs sheet. I had to e-mail Calla for the full engineer specs to find out. Here's a comparison of offset from irons circa 2009:

Offset (inches)

3i

PW

X20

0.270

0.200

X20 Tour

0.145

0.075

Miz MP57

0.161

0.114

Miz MX200

0.211

0.142

Here's a more detailed discussion of offset from club designer Ralph Maltby's site: http://www.ralphmaltby.com/forum/topic/33?page=1#number2

One thing offset does is promote better hand position for middle-HDCP golfers, which helps them launch the ball higher.

As for hybrids, I tested quite a few. The standard hybrids tend to have a fair amount of offset - and, although I have just average clubhead speed, I tended to hook them. The Tour or Pro heads have much less offset, and I hit them much straighter. The only problem: it's hard to find the Pro or Tour models with R-flex shafts.

As for hybrid design: Like wood or iron...

Hybrids have been around long enough to get complicated. The "traditional" hybrids (yes, we're there already!) were designed to fall between long irons and fairway woods in shaft length and loft. More recently, the club makers have come up with "iron replacement" hybrids. Case in point are the Mizuno JPX FLI-HI hybrids, which have the same shaft length and head loft as the numbered irons they are designed to replace. The 4H and the JPX family 4-irons both have 38.25" shafts and 22* loft.*

*Note: JPX-825 Pro 4i actually has 23* loft.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Offset helps you to hit the ball higher and gives you more time to close the face.  IMO, most people would benefit from offset, unless you hit the ball too high and your miss is a pull or hook.

Offset gives you almost no extra time to close the face. I've done the math on this elsewhere. It's negligible. Old wive's tale, basically, that it gives you more "time."

Offset makes the face look open to many people, so they simply set up with it more closed.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3760 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
    • I would think that 3 in a row with the same players might get some behind the scenes examination from the SCGA if they were suspect.  Are there any clubs questioning the results?
    • What simple fact? A golf match is not a coin flip — there is a fact for you. I'm trying to help you, and you're throwing out what could easily be called sour grapes. Come with FACTS, not weak analogies. Then you've got nothing. Hopefully they've done a better job of making their case. 😛 
    • It's pretty close. The odds of a 50/50 shot going your way 21 times are greater than 1 in a million!  I guess your point is, that simple fact is not enough to declare these guys dirty rotten sandbaggers. I disagree, but fair enough. I posted it here on the message board to get different perspectives, after all.  I probably won't be digging further into specific scores. I have no dog in this fight beyond a generalized contempt for sandbagging. With that said, it would not surprise if a lot of clubs shared my concern and were grousing about it to the SCGA.
    • I had an article on Cam Smith pop up along with this..... Current major eligibility list for all LIV Golf players Here's a look at which majors, if any, all LIV Golf players are eligible.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...