• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
pappy01

Need some advice

Recommended Posts

I am torn between what shaft flex I should be playing. I went through a Bridgestone ball fitting on 6/15/2011 and had the following results.

Swing Speed 98.0 MPH

Ball Speed 133.8

Launch Angle 1.2

Back Spin 3,197 RPM

These were with the use of a Callaway 9.0 degree driver with a stiff shaft.

Since then I have purchased a 10.5 degree Cobra AMP with a stiff shaft. I hit this club with a slight draw. My misses seem to be a pull hook.

I will tun 66 at the end of this month and I feel I am not swinging at the speed needed for a stiff shaft. However, I am hitting this decent.

I would like to know the advantage of going to a regular flex shaft and how it might benefit me. Would I get more distance and control?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

On a side note, your smash factor is 1.365

Launch angle of 1.2? that is like absurdly low.

Post a video of your driver swing in the "My Swing" section. I have a feeling you hit way to down on the ball. That almost looks like a mishit. That could have been a strike on the low part of the clubface. Though the spin is low for that type of strike. Probably topped it a bi, hitting up on the ball, very low on the clubface. Just strange numbers.

Note, shaft weight means more than shaft flex. Well bend profile means more as well. So here's the thing. Don't get caught up on S and X. Unless the bend profile changes greatly between flex, its hard to tell the difference. What I do find common though is lets say you are hitting an S and switch to an X, it could make you swing faster because it does feel stiffer. So that can be an issue for some that it will cause them to swing faster then they need to be.

As for you, you probably want something like bellow,

I checked out the UST Mamiya online shaft fitting, for you, lets say you want distance (lighter club)

VST 65 Silver, (3.5-4 torque, medium kick point, 60-70 gram shaft), something like that.

That would be a medium launch club, softer tip. If you find the spin to high for that, go with a bit stiffer profile, maybe less torque.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Saeve125, I do have an over the top move that comes form in my opinion of trying to swing to fast.

Could you give me what a better launch angle would be, and smash factor. From what I read from you you are not suggesting I go to a R Flex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saeve125, I do have an over the top move that comes form in my opinion of trying to swing to fast.

Could you give me what a better launch angle would be, and smash factor. From what I read from you you are not suggesting I go to a R Flex.

Let me ask one thing first, is that 1.2 degrees as in less than 2

or is that 12 degrees and you accidentally put in a period?

Cause, 12 degrees would be pretty good, but usually 11 to 14 degrees is common.

Smash factor for a driver, I would like to see 1.45 and above, you are doing really good. You are loosing out on 9 mph of ball speed. That is pretty big. That is about 25 yards of distance.

For you, I'd look for 13-14 degrees of launch, around 2700 rpm, and about a 140-145 ball speed. That would probably be your max drive. You'd be looking at around 230 carry for the driver and anywhere from 5 to 20 yards of roll out depending on ground conditions.

Now getting there will take you fixing your swing, but just give you some idea with the numbers.

As for fixing your swing, got to get rid of coming over the top. Also got to learn how to hit up on the ball with the driver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I voted "no". Reason being there is/are sanctioned events and tours (e.g. Michigan Hickory Tour) and some are even shown on Sky Sports. They even have the Trilby Tour. This is a real amateur tour where the main stipulation is that you have to wear a trilby hat (i kid you not). Like many have said, the tech is soooooo different that it is more likely to be detrimental to their regular game that anything other than 9 holes or so for charity or exhibition wouldnt be worth it for them. That being said, some older pro's have switched largely to hickory golf with a lot of success. Sandy Lyle for instance won the hickory World Golf Open in 2014 and 2016. Still plays modern gear but in interviews says he enjoys the old stuff more. Difference is that Sandy isn't competing at the very top of the sport these days.
    • @Jack Watson, I think you know as well as I that the USA Today article is garbage in terms of saying pros want to play full tournaments with hickory. In fact, one of the first quotes in the video was, "Wouldn't want to play them from the tees we play nowadays". The the most praise they got was that the person "enjoyed the hit" or that it felt soft, but the soft wasn't necessarily good considering one of the pros likened it to "a bar of soap". In other words, the old equipment is garbage (crap) by comparison. It's the same as if you compared a Ford Pinto to a modern Ford Focus: the Pinto is crap by comparison (though there are a few who have a nostalgic infatuation with the older one).   My point is that what you think, "They should have enough pride to actually want to do this," has absolutely no bearing on reality. The pros have nothing to gain from playing this event, besides maybe to blow off some steam as a joke. It certainly wouldn't count towards the FedEx cup and they'd have to devote extra time to practice with equipment that, quite frankly, no longer is relevant or matters anywhere outside of a history museum.  I'd be willing to bet $100 that a survey of all pros on tour would show more against such an event than in favor of it. I understand that you very much want to see the event happen, but you should also be able to understand the reasons why such an event would never happen and why a majority of the golfers would be against it.  
    • I posted this for people who are intered in testing their core and balance, with these three progressive moves.  then leaving a comment on how they did.  If you are not interested in doing that please go somewhere else
    • @Vinsk  You have not shown a shred of evidence to support your view as I did.  Snedeker agrees with me and he shot 80 with vintage gear.  Where is your evidence?  I offered mine. Platitudes do not qualify as arguments.
    • It’s just more of the, “I just won’t admit this game is incredibly hard” nonsense to me. “Oh yeah? Well let’s see these pros who think they’re so good hit ‘real gear’.” It’s all nonsense. They’re that good. Period. @Jack Watson, you’re not. Whether it be hickory or space age titanium. Let it go. You’ll never ‘figure golf out.” Ok sorry. I’m done.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Get Great Gear with Amazon