Advertisement
Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
AchilliesNDS7

Taylormade R9 VS Callaway FT-5

5 posts in this topic

Hi i am a 14 hcp and have the option to buy a R9 for £50 or a Callaway FT-5 for £35. I am not sure which i should buy they both go pretty well and I carry the ball around 260-70 yards with each club when I tested them. I do like the look of the R9 and the adjustability idea but does it work and is it worth it? What would the main pros and cons that they may have over each other be?

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Which version of the R9 is it?  I'm not that familiar with them, but I remember there were at least 3 versions of the R9.

The FT-5 came in 2 versions, Tour and Standard.   Each version was offered in 3 options, fade, draw and neutral.  I'm not sure if that matters.  They also were the first drivers that Callaway released as I-MIX which means you can swap out the shaft on your own and use other I-MIX shafts with it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Standard R9 the 420cc version not 460, this one is fully adjustable. The Callaway FT-5 is the tour version in neutral and not the imix version. Thanks for the reply

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd probably go with the R9, especially if you like the smaller driver head.  The FT-5 is known to have a hot face, but not very forgiving.  Do you have a preference on the shafts that either one comes with?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would go with the r9. I really wish I would ha e never ditched that driver. But I had to have the Cleveland classic and the 10 yards I picked up well they do t show as much as I played in the shortgrass with the r9. Just remember it's not the distance off the tee it's the height of the grass you land in. Good luck and think of what one you like to look at more
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Considering I was 4 years old. 200?  Is that legal?
    • Is that one of your pics?  If it is...outstanding sir!  Love the way the grass and dirt from the divot exploded around him.  Very cool.
    • Yep. The picture you posted of the top of the grips to show the difference in length caught my eye...the blue grip on the Mizzy looks like it might not be on all the way or something like that. Are all the Mizuno irons that much longer than all the Hogan irons, or is each club a little different?  Or do you just have the 5 irons for the Radials and not the whole set?  You could also measure them like this to find out: Should be 37 3/4". I'm curious on which one is not the stock length.
    • 24/2/17 - more mirror work with P2 and P3 the focus. This is definitely starting to feel more natural. Well done for taking the plunge and posting videos. Lots of good things in the swing and I'm sure when you post the my swing thread, someone will give you the right tips to move forward. Well worth doing though; I've gained a lot from mine. Keep it up!
    • I watched this video...watched the whole thing. I'm familiar with Mark's videos and I think he generally does a really good job. I see the result of his test, and it was interesting.  I happen to have extensive first-hand experience with launch data and have literally tested thousands of players over the course of 18 years, 10 of those when I was with a major golf ball manufacturer, and although I like Mark, I don't know another way to say this other than just about everything he said is wrong. Think about it logically...how can a low compression, 2-piece, Surlyn covered ball perform virtually the same as a high compression, 3 or 4-piece, urethane covered ball with different dimple patterns?  They claim the difference is in the feel and performance with wedges?  That would mean if my spin rate was too high with my driver, moving to a different model ball will have no effect in reducing it.  This is flat-out incorrect. The fact is distance balls do go further than high spin "tour" balls for most players, and playing a lower spinning ball will help reduce your hook or slice.  I'm not just spouting off something I read somewhere or giving you my opinion...I have worked with players of all abilities, watched them hit several shots with a certain ball, analyzed their launch numbers for areas that need improving and asked them to hit a different ball and compared the data.  There is a difference.  For some players it might be more dramatic than others, but it's nonsense to think all balls are within a few yards of each other or all balls curve the same amount.  Here is an example: For this player, there is 15 yards difference between these two models, and the longer ball curves less too (although it's not a lot).  And these two models are closer in design than the Pro V1 and DT Solo.  I'm not sure why the results in the video example didn't show any difference, but working with 20-25 players per day, 5 days a week for many years I have seen the difference with my own eyes.  Will everyone gain 20-25 yards or reduce their slice by 35%?  No...but I've seen it happen.  Average is closer to 9 yards and 30%.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. alienator
      alienator
      (43 years old)
    2. b101
      b101
      (29 years old)
    3. hawkcrew2000
      hawkcrew2000
      (37 years old)
    4. TheRookie
      TheRookie
      (31 years old)
    View all
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon