Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Help me out on buying new clubs? (left Handed)

3 posts in this topic

I am looking to buy a new set of Irons, I used to play a good amount and have taken a break until now, I am selling my old clubs and want to get some that are quality clubs. looking to spend around $300-$400 on irons probably, what would yall suggest? I am definitely going to get used clubs.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Welcome to the site.

1. Go to shop and try out everything.

2. Get fitted (lie and length) to see if you need adjustments. If so, then your used window closes a bit more. Some shops will not bend cast clubs.

3. If you can play "standard length and lie" clubs,( search around here for threads on fitting) then look at , , you can find top level clubs of 2012-2013 for around 3-400 bucks all day.

4. You have to play your clubs, not what anyone else uses, or what Joe Tour player uses, find what is best for your game.

5. Good luck in your quest, I love it when its time for new clubs, part of the fun of the game.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No doubt any computer in the last 20 years at least has the processing power, it's more the logistics of it. We'd need all new voting machines, or secure online voting (which I might be in favor of). All of the votes would need to get entered into a huge database with much more chance for error on different levels, plus you could have bugs, etc.  Right now, because our vote-counting is so granular, any technical issues are generally localized to particular precincts. Any glitches in a nationwide count would have much larger implications.  So, while possible, I still think it would be a pretty big challenge to make sure it goes off without a major hitch. We all know how well the government does with websites and technology 
    • I think the hole size is fair and does not need to be changed.  Also, how many millions of rounds have been played with the current size hole?    To me it is like the narrow definition of "hazard" - I don't like it but it has been the rule since the R&A created them.. it would be like allowing 4 strikes for an out in baseball.
    • Agree, and we have strayed pretty far from the original system of stronger state governments. They control their own fates in congress, so it makes sense to me that popular vote should control the presidency. I would even support that for party nominations. 
    • Thankfully they didn't play that song. 
    • I didn't vote (yet). I suspect that if the hole had always been some other specific size (e.g., 2x, 3x, 4x ball diameter; or 4 inches, 6 inches, etc.) I probably would have considered that to be correct and wouldn't give it a second thought, unless someone else had a different standard--like the standardizing of golf ball size a few decades ago.   I also suspect that if there were no standard hole size, I would have considered that to be correct. After all, greens are all different sizes, configurations, and we consider that part of the game. Probably would be reflected in the slope/rating.   Imagine: "What do you think of Rory's putt coming up here, Roger?" "I don't know, Jim: He's got a short putt here for birdie, but on this green they used a 3 inch hole today. Not like the fourth hole where they gave them a 6 inch target--that was easier despite the way the green tilts toward the creek.   And not like Oakmont last week, where they went with 5 inch holes on all 18 greens on Sunday to give the guys a lot more birdie opportunities." So I suppose my answer is "No, because if it were larger or smaller, we would adjust--our scores (everyone's) would be lower or higher-- it would just be a "new normal."
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 17hoffmanc
      (18 years old)
    2. jamo
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries