Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What is 'right' number of members for private course


Note: This thread is 4261 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I'm looking at re-joining a private club in my area after a several year hiatus from the club scene and am looking at a few different options. One concern I have is that as clubs have had to cut their initiation and monthly dues to keep and attract members over the past several years, they may have offset that financial hit by letting in more members than they would have before. Part of the reason I want to join a private club again is so I don't have to fight for tee times on the weekends, so I want a club that doesn't have too many members fighting for too few tee times.

So with that said, from your experience with clubs, what have you all found to be the 'right' or optimal number of members to have for an 18 hole course. I know there are several factors that are tough to determine with answering that question, but I'm just trying to get a sense here. Thanks in advance


Posted

So I'm looking at re-joining a private club in my area after a several year hiatus from the club scene and am looking at a few different options. One concern I have is that as clubs have had to cut their initiation and monthly dues to keep and attract members over the past several years, they may have offset that financial hit by letting in more members than they would have before. Part of the reason I want to join a private club again is so I don't have to fight for tee times on the weekends, so I want a club that doesn't have too many members fighting for too few tee times.

So with that said, from your experience with clubs, what have you all found to be the 'right' or optimal number of members to have for an 18 hole course. I know there are several factors that are tough to determine with answering that question, but I'm just trying to get a sense here. Thanks in advance

There is no right answer, it depends on when people play.

At my club, we have a ton of members that play Monday through Friday, but will not be caught dead with the *slow* 3:45-4 hour round on the weekends.

More members is good for keeping dues affordable. If you want the place empty on the weekends, be prepared to pay more.

At my club, Saturday tee times are 7:30 - 9:22am off front and back, meaning 128 people can tee off before 9:30 on Saturdays - if demand becomes more, they will change it to a shotgun start every week to accommodate more golfers.

I wouldnt worry about there being *too many* members anywhere - many private clubs are struggling to stay afloat.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

So with that said, from your experience with clubs, what have you all found to be the 'right' or optimal number of members to have for an 18 hole course. I know there are several factors that are tough to determine with answering that question, but I'm just trying to get a sense here. Thanks in advance

Kinda depends on the club. From my experience it's about 400-450, you're "safe" up to 550. Enough members that the club is financially secure but not crowded. That's just counting "regular" members, not "out of town" members or junior members.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Kinda depends on the club. From my experience it's about 400-450, you're "safe" up to 550. Enough members that the club is financially secure but not crowded. That's just counting "regular" members, not "out of town" members or junior members.

Yep....

I'd tend to agree with 400-500 range.  If it's a club with more facilities and amenities than just golf......an active tennis association, pool, racquetball/squash, etc... then a higher number will be reasonable and necessary because all members won't necessarily be competing for space on the golf course and more revenues are needed to maintain the facilities.  A younger membership will tend to play more on the weekends, while an older membership will play throughout the week a bit more.

While a smaller membership may mean less crowding on the course, a lot of private clubs have had to transition to accepting public play around here in the past several years.  Good for those of us who can now play them, but a tough nut for the membership to swallow.  With lower membership numbers, comes increased exposure to economic downturns.  It's a fine line.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yep,  I agree guys. Thanks for the input. Definitely a fine line to walk between overcrowding and being financially stable/keeping dues reasonable.

I was also thinking the same range in the 400-500 ballpark but just wanted to make sure I wasn't way off.


Posted

I worked at my first course for 20 years. they always had 285 members (9 hole course) which was the cap max. the first 10 years or so the course was not busy in fact the place would be empty after noon time on the weekends. as new members came in there was a steady increase in play where now the run tee times in a split tier system till almost 3 in the afternoon. so I think its not just how many members but also how active of a membership too.


Note: This thread is 4261 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The term I hear most often is "double teeing" which means the course/club has starting times from both the #1 and #10 tee.  I have encountered this many times and we know if we are the first group off #10, we may well get to #1 and have to wait because there are groups still with tee times yet to tee of #1.  In most instances, where the course/club has a starter, he normally explains this situation.  In this case, the pro advised what you would could/would encounter making the turn to #1.  And, that is exactly what happened.  Probably would have been wise to talk to the pro after playing back 9 and ask when you could go off #1 since apparently that club does not double tee.   Regardless, the outburst towards the other group was uncalled for.  And, I don't blame the member for being upset.  As a member of a private club, you are responsible for the actions of your guest.  I have played many times as a guest in the UK and I am pretty damn sure my host was responsible for my actions while at the club.  I know at the clubs I have belonged to here in the US, that is the way it is.  As a matter of fact, the member may find himself being brought before management and facing possible suspension.  So, I don't blame him for being upset.  However, as the host, he really should have stepped up and put a stop to the OP's actions.  OP makes this statement "I now understand that standards are different on the "private course." But I'll take those lessons to the muni, too."  No, the standards are not different.  You, sir, seem to be just a bit hard headed and belligerent, even if you are college professor...which possibly explains a lot.   JMHO
    • Day 32: worked for about 10 minutes on my drill. Filmed it as well for a check in. I think it’s slightly better but still seeing some issues. 
    • Day 44 (26 Dec 25)  -  played in the Friday men’s shootout with a twist - used the Toney Penna persimmons and MacGregor blades - had a blast playing these clubs.  They really help in zoning in on making solid ball contact.  Scoring was solid - had several looks at birdie and had a few par saves.  Overall a day of focused course management. 
    • Day 2: 2025.12.27 Eighteen holes at Kauri Cliffs. Focusing on trying to keep flex in right leg during backswing.
    • Day 136 12-26 Had a different practice planned today but life happened. Worked on "wide to wide" and still working on remaining flowy. Starting the club head in front of the ball as a drill, is helping with the flow of the swing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.