Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is the average tour pro golfer a better putter than generations before?


Note: This thread is 4339 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Don't forget about hitting the line you want. You can read every putt right, but if you constantly push or pull putts off that line, you'll be missing a lot of putts.

Good point. I forgot about technique since mine is so flawless. :-$

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
http://blog.ted.com/2014/03/20/whats-making-athletes-faster-better-stronger-david-epstein-at-ted2014/ I think this applies to putting as well.

Posted
http://blog.ted.com/2014/03/20/whats-making-athletes-faster-better-stronger-david-epstein-at-ted2014/ I think this applies to putting as well.

Posted

I have to disagree that the argument Epstein is making in the TED talk applies to putting.  He is addressing the incremental performance improvements that result from pushing the efficient frontier of athletic performance.  In golf, that efficient frontier (where equipment, practice, physique, etc. are the limits on performance) is, in a nutshell, the full swing.  Things like driving distance, clubhead speed, etc.  Neither putting nor the short game in any sense lie on the efficient frontier of athleticism in golf.


Posted
That is just one of several points he makes. There are others. 1. There are more golfers in the world. This means there are more people trying to get on the PGA, which means the PGA will be more selective and the average will be better over time. 2. People have tried many different putting strokes, types of putters, etc. Over the last few decades. New golfers have a lot more knowledge to draw from when learning how to putt. 3. People have a better understanding of how to practice, how much you need to practice, how young to get kids started, etc. So people are spending a higher number of total hours with quality practice.

Posted

That is just one of several points he makes. There are others.

1. There are more golfers in the world. This means there are more people trying to get on the PGA, which means the PGA will be more selective and the average will be better over time.

2. People have tried many different putting strokes, types of putters, etc. Over the last few decades. New golfers have a lot more knowledge to draw from when learning how to putt.

3. People have a better understanding of how to practice, how much you need to practice, how young to get kids started, etc. So people are spending a higher number of total hours with quality practice.

The thing is, a lot of your points don't make a difference.

1) The PGA tour is dominated by superb ballstrikers. Putting needs to be decent, but it doesn't have to come close to great for someone to make a good living on the tour. One example of this is Matt Every. He is ranked #1 currently in Strokes Gained Putting (at .911) while being only ranked 24th in the FedEx Cup standings (and slipping). However, Jim Furyk and Bubba Watson (the best at Proximity to the Hole and Driving Distance) are ranked 2nd and 6th respectively.

2) You can only change a putting stroke so much before you're just doing the same thing with minor tweaks that don't make a difference. The only reason pros now have difference putting strokes than those of old is because their greens roll true and are significantly faster than what Nicklaus and Palmer putted on. The only "different" putting strokes created in the last 50 years (that have been used with some level of success) are the sidesaddle stroke and the idea of using a belly putter. One of them was used (by Sam Snead) because a similar stroke was ruled illegal and the other has since been ruled illegal.

3) You can get a kid to putt every bit as well as a PGA Tour pro because it doesn't take as much practice. Case in point: On a vacation to the Bahamas (with slower greens) Tiger Woods' 5-year old son almost beat him in a putting contest. The faster greens can be harder for young kids to handle (because it's hard for them to make the needed small adjustments until they get older) but they can still putt every bit as well. I played in a scramble with my teaching pro, his 10 year old son, and another high school golfer and the son whipped us all when it came to putting.

Putting has a low separation value. You will never see someone become a professional solely due to their putting while they miss 10 greens a round. You have to be decent (but not great) at putting to get on the PGA tour, but the important part is to have phenomenal ballstriking day in and day out.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4339 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,831 X/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.