Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4039 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just played a round with a new driver yesterday. More accurate than my older driver, but a loss of distance of about 20 yards. But the weather conditions were quite different.

Old driver: September, 90 degrees with just a little humidity. New driver: November, 72 degrees with damp, muggy air.

How much of this is because of the different driver and how much can I blame on the weather? Maybe 10 yards because of the weather and 10 yards because of the club?

I know what you're thinking -- why don't I just take my old driver to the course and hit it under similar conditions? First, because of my odd working schedule and the end of daylight savings time, I might not play again until March. And even if I did, I'm not sure I would play under the exact same conditions.

Your thoughts?

What's in the bag:
Driver: TaylorMade R9-460, 10.5 degrees, graphite shaft R flex
Hybrids: Kasco, 17 and 25 degrees, stock graphite shafts
Irons: MacGregor 1025 V-Foil forged irons, 4-PW, graphite shafts R, 2 degrees upright
Wedges: TaylorMade Black Oxide, 52, 56, and 60 degrees, graphite shafts
Putter: Rife Barbados mallet, 35 inches with SuperStroke 2.0 grip                                                                                                      Ball: Titleist AVX yellow 

 

 


Posted
Just played a round with a new driver yesterday. More accurate than my older driver, but a loss of distance of about 20 yards. But the weather conditions were quite different.

Old driver: September, 90 degrees with just a little humidity. New driver: November, 72 degrees with damp, muggy air.

How much of this is because of the different driver and how much can I blame on the weather? Maybe 10 yards because of the weather and 10 yards because of the club?

I know what you're thinking -- why don't I just take my old driver to the course and hit it under similar conditions? First, because of my odd working schedule and the end of daylight savings time, I might not play again until March. And even if I did, I'm not sure I would play under the exact same conditions.

Your thoughts?

My calculator has 90* at +4% and 72* at -2% so about a net 6% carry difference due to air temp with constant air pressure and humidity (which is really negligible).

So the answer to your question depends on distance of your average drive and maybe the fairway characteristics. Cool and humid makes me think of moist / soggy fairways versus 90* and dry.

You could have carried the ball the same amount and gotten much better roll-out on the dry day, especially if the new driver (used on the cool moist day) was higher launching / more loft.

Kevin


  • Moderator
Posted

Humid air is less dense than dry air, so you will have some effect from high humidity increasing distance a bit.  It is less dense because a water vapor molecule has less mass than O2 and N2 molecules.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
High humidity is different from damp air. In damp air the moisture has condensed forming water droplets which has MORE friction than water molecules in gas phase. So the ball will travel less in damp air but will travel more in high humid air.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
High humidity is different from damp air. In damp air the moisture has condensed forming water droplets which has MORE friction than water molecules in gas phase. So the ball will travel less in damp air but will travel more in high humid air.

Disagree.  In order to have damp air, the humidity will have to be 100%, so the air is less dense.   The OP did not say it was foggy or misting.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Humid air is less dense than dry air, so you will have some effect from high humidity increasing distance a bit.  It is less dense because a water vapor molecule has less mass than O2 and N2 molecules.

While I don't dispute that fact, the info I've looked at indicate that humidity is almost negligible in it's effects on carry distance. Air temp it the dominant factor, ball temp is significant but far less.

With equal air temps, humidity / dampness as a factor in fairway conditions would be more significant in total distance due to a softer landing and less run-out.

Kevin


  • Administrator
Posted
With equal air temps, humidity / dampness as a factor in fairway conditions would be more significant in total distance due to a softer landing and less run-out.


Humidity and "dampness" are very different things. I've played some rock-hard golf courses in very high humidity.

Most people don't seem to be able to separate "humidity" from "dampness" - water vapor from water droplets .

It isn't a large contributor, though - a few yards.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by natureboy

With equal air temps, humidity / dampness as a factor in fairway conditions would be more significant in total distance due to a softer landing and less run-out.

Humidity and "dampness" are very different things. I've played some rock-hard golf courses in very high humidity.

Most people don't seem to be able to separate "humidity" from "dampness" - water vapor from water droplets.

It isn't a large contributor, though - a few yards.

Agree.  As I stated in my first post, it would contribute a bit (as in a small amount).

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Humidity and "dampness" are very different things. I've played some rock-hard golf courses in very high humidity.

Most people don't seem to be able to separate "humidity" from "dampness" - water vapor from water droplets.

It isn't a large contributor, though - a few yards.

I wasn't referring to water droplets. It was more of a 'morning conditions' vs. 'afternoon conditions' comparison.

More precisely my post should have read "cool, humid, & therefore damp (due to ground condensation)" as affecting fairway softness.

Agreed a hot humid day with well-baked fairways would be a good day for total distance.

Kevin


Posted

Just played a round with a new driver yesterday. More accurate than my older driver, but a loss of distance of about 20 yards. But the weather conditions were quite different.

Old driver: September, 90 degrees with just a little humidity. New driver: November, 72 degrees with damp, muggy air.

How much of this is because of the different driver and how much can I blame on the weather? Maybe 10 yards because of the weather and 10 yards because of the club?

I know what you're thinking -- why don't I just take my old driver to the course and hit it under similar conditions? First, because of my odd working schedule and the end of daylight savings time, I might not play again until March. And even if I did, I'm not sure I would play under the exact same conditions.

Your thoughts?

My calculator has 90* at +4% and 72* at -2% so about a net 6% carry difference due to air temp with constant air pressure and humidity (which is really negligible).

So the answer to your question depends on distance of your average drive and maybe the fairway characteristics. Cool and humid makes me think of moist / soggy fairways versus 90* and dry.

You could have carried the ball the same amount and gotten much better roll-out on the dry day, especially if the new driver (used on the cool moist day) was higher launching / more loft.

Updated my distance calculator to be a bit more conservative in the estimates.

To some extent it depends how far you hit your drives too. Higher swing speeds compress colder golf balls better and lose less there.

90* is now +2% and 72* is -.8% for a net ~ 2.8% difference in carry distance. As said in other posts, differing fairway conditions on the two days could be a significant factor in the total distance.

Personally, I would expect differences in roll-out and launch angle / landing angle from conditions and (different?) driver lofts to outweigh the temperature effects. What about getting on a simulator / launch monitor for an additional comparison on just carry and total distance holding the other factors constant?

Kevin


Note: This thread is 4039 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.