Jump to content
Note: This thread is 3627 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Not long after I started playing golf in the late 1980s, my sister got me a coffee table book called "The Fifty Greatest Golfers." It was published in 1985 and the selections were made by Peter Alliss, Arnold Palmer, Mark McCormack and the writer Peter Dobereiner. It was limited to post-World War II players.

In alphabetical order, here are the guys who made the grade back then:

Isao Aoki, Sevi Ballesteros, Tommy Bolt, Michael Bonallack, Julius Boros, Jack Burke, Billy Casper, Bob Charles, Neil Coles, Henry Cotton, Ben Crenshaw, Jimmy Demaret, Nick Faldo, Dow Finsterwald, Raymond Floyd, Doug Ford, David Graham, Harold Henning, Ben Hogan, Hale Irwin, Tony Jacklin, Don January, Tony Lema, Gene Littler, Bobby Locke, Lloyd Mangrum, Graham Marsh, Cary Middlecoff, Johnny Miller, Kel Nagle, Byron Nelson, Larry Nelson, Jack Nicklaus, Greg Norman, Christy O'Connor, Arnold Palmer, Jerry Pate, Gary Player, Dai Rees, Doug Sanders, Sam Snead, Peter Thomson, Lee Trevino, Roberto De Vicenzo, Lanny Wadkins, Art Wall, Harvie Ward, Tom Watson, Tom Weiskopf and Fuzzy Zoeller.

Thirty years have passed since the book's publication. Which players who arrived on the scene since that time would make the list today? Who would they supplant?

Woods, Mickelson and McIlroy would definitely be added, but who else? Ernie Els? Nick Price? Payne Stewart? Bubba Watson?

For my money, Aoki, Charles, Graham, January, Pate, Sanders and Zoeller would be the prime candidates for ouster. I'm not sure about a lot of the guys whose primes preceded my birth (1964).

What do you all think?

John


I would take it even further than that. There are fewer golfers on that roster that I would lock into an updated list than golfers I would need to make a closer look at.

Pre-1990s players still locked into top-50 list

Ballesteros

Casper

Demaret

Faldo

Floyd

Hogan

Jacklin

Lema

Locke

Middlecoff

Byron Nelson

Nicklaus

Norman

Palmer

Player

Snead

Thomson

Trevino

de Vicenzo

Tom Watson

Post-1990s golfers who would be top-50 locks

Els

McIlroy

MIckelson

Singh

Woods

Post-1990s players in top-50 consideration

Couples

Daly

Furyk

Garcia

Goosen

Harrington

Kaymer

Kite

Langer

Love

Montgomerie

Olazabal

O'Meara

Jumbo Ozaki

Price

Scott

Stewart

Westwood

Woosnam

At the end of the day, there are a lot of judgment calls on there.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Depends on how big you take majors into account. Guys like Colin Montgomerie, Lee Westwood and Sergio Garcia have great resumes, but lack majors. I think you have to take a look at some multiple major winners that have also had success outside of majors, such as Ernie Els, Retief Goosen, Vijay Singh, Mark O'Meara, Nick Price and Payne Stewart. Of course, Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy and Phil Mickelson are slam dunks to be on that list.

If you could add 15 guys since 1990, I'd add Woods, McIlroy, Mickelson, Singh, Els, Goosen, Price, Stewart, Langer, Couples, Kite, Olazabal, Furyk, Harrington, and O'Meara. In 10 years, though, I think you'll be adding Scott, Rose, Kaymer, and possibly Zach Johnson and Graeme McDowell on that list if they can crack another major or two.


Golf Digest did a top 50 list in 2000 that is not too far off from what has been posted so far, except they mingled male and female which is not the fairest way to go about it. Of course, there would be some shuffling of the order since 2000, but the names wouldn't change much except a couple of additions like McIlroy. Changing to male and female only would open up a few spots.

I believe that Bobby Jones, Walter Hagen, and Harry Vardon still belong on any such list.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3627 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yes. I believe in using the same ball all of the time, including chipping and putting practice. I use the orange Callaway Supersoft.  Only $25 per dozen, and sometimes on sale for $20.
    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...