Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3995 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not long after I started playing golf in the late 1980s, my sister got me a coffee table book called "The Fifty Greatest Golfers." It was published in 1985 and the selections were made by Peter Alliss, Arnold Palmer, Mark McCormack and the writer Peter Dobereiner. It was limited to post-World War II players.

In alphabetical order, here are the guys who made the grade back then:

Isao Aoki, Sevi Ballesteros, Tommy Bolt, Michael Bonallack, Julius Boros, Jack Burke, Billy Casper, Bob Charles, Neil Coles, Henry Cotton, Ben Crenshaw, Jimmy Demaret, Nick Faldo, Dow Finsterwald, Raymond Floyd, Doug Ford, David Graham, Harold Henning, Ben Hogan, Hale Irwin, Tony Jacklin, Don January, Tony Lema, Gene Littler, Bobby Locke, Lloyd Mangrum, Graham Marsh, Cary Middlecoff, Johnny Miller, Kel Nagle, Byron Nelson, Larry Nelson, Jack Nicklaus, Greg Norman, Christy O'Connor, Arnold Palmer, Jerry Pate, Gary Player, Dai Rees, Doug Sanders, Sam Snead, Peter Thomson, Lee Trevino, Roberto De Vicenzo, Lanny Wadkins, Art Wall, Harvie Ward, Tom Watson, Tom Weiskopf and Fuzzy Zoeller.

Thirty years have passed since the book's publication. Which players who arrived on the scene since that time would make the list today? Who would they supplant?

Woods, Mickelson and McIlroy would definitely be added, but who else? Ernie Els? Nick Price? Payne Stewart? Bubba Watson?

For my money, Aoki, Charles, Graham, January, Pate, Sanders and Zoeller would be the prime candidates for ouster. I'm not sure about a lot of the guys whose primes preceded my birth (1964).

What do you all think?

John


Posted

I would take it even further than that. There are fewer golfers on that roster that I would lock into an updated list than golfers I would need to make a closer look at.

Pre-1990s players still locked into top-50 list

Ballesteros

Casper

Demaret

Faldo

Floyd

Hogan

Jacklin

Lema

Locke

Middlecoff

Byron Nelson

Nicklaus

Norman

Palmer

Player

Snead

Thomson

Trevino

de Vicenzo

Tom Watson

Post-1990s golfers who would be top-50 locks

Els

McIlroy

MIckelson

Singh

Woods

Post-1990s players in top-50 consideration

Couples

Daly

Furyk

Garcia

Goosen

Harrington

Kaymer

Kite

Langer

Love

Montgomerie

Olazabal

O'Meara

Jumbo Ozaki

Price

Scott

Stewart

Westwood

Woosnam

At the end of the day, there are a lot of judgment calls on there.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

Depends on how big you take majors into account. Guys like Colin Montgomerie, Lee Westwood and Sergio Garcia have great resumes, but lack majors. I think you have to take a look at some multiple major winners that have also had success outside of majors, such as Ernie Els, Retief Goosen, Vijay Singh, Mark O'Meara, Nick Price and Payne Stewart. Of course, Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy and Phil Mickelson are slam dunks to be on that list.

If you could add 15 guys since 1990, I'd add Woods, McIlroy, Mickelson, Singh, Els, Goosen, Price, Stewart, Langer, Couples, Kite, Olazabal, Furyk, Harrington, and O'Meara. In 10 years, though, I think you'll be adding Scott, Rose, Kaymer, and possibly Zach Johnson and Graeme McDowell on that list if they can crack another major or two.


Posted

Golf Digest did a top 50 list in 2000 that is not too far off from what has been posted so far, except they mingled male and female which is not the fairest way to go about it. Of course, there would be some shuffling of the order since 2000, but the names wouldn't change much except a couple of additions like McIlroy. Changing to male and female only would open up a few spots.

I believe that Bobby Jones, Walter Hagen, and Harry Vardon still belong on any such list.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3995 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.