Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3981 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Which GPS to Use?

    • Sky Caddie
      5
    • Golf Shot
      2
    • Golf Logix
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted

I've used a Sky Caddie the past few years.  I like it a lot, but I don't like the annual cost.  I'm thinking of switching over to Golf Shot or Golf Logix.  Anybody out there with any strong opinions on any of the three?


Posted

Golf Logix is pretty good.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I stop using Sky Caddie, and went with Golf Logix several years ago. Quite pleased with this change. They both did the same things, but I found Logix some what easier/quicker to use. I also use Logix for measuring shot distances way out here in the sticks. I like to keep up with my "carry" yardages with specific clubs.

The irony is I use the Logix device more for practice, than I do when actually playing. I use my lazer more when playing than the Logix device as it much quicker. Then again, over the years, I have learned to be quite accurate when eyeballing distances. Accurate enough with the clubs I use anyways.

I don't know anything about Golf Shot.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I stop using Sky Caddie, and went with Golf Logix several years ago. Quite pleased with this change. They both did the same things, but I found Logix some what easier/quicker to use. I also use Logix for measuring shot distances way out here in the sticks. I like to keep up with my "carry" yardages with specific clubs.

The irony is I use the Logix device more for practice, than I do when actually playing. I use my lazer more when playing than the Logix device as it much quicker. Then again, over the years, I have learned to be quite accurate when eyeballing distances. Accurate enough with the clubs I use anyways.

I don't know anything about Golf Shot.


Thanks, Patch.  It seems like the website for GolfShot is a bit better.  What did you do with your old Sky Caddie?


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patch

I stop using Sky Caddie, and went with Golf Logix several years ago. Quite pleased with this change. They both did the same things, but I found Logix some what easier/quicker to use. I also use Logix for measuring shot distances way out here in the sticks. I like to keep up with my "carry" yardages with specific clubs.

The irony is I use the Logix device more for practice, than I do when actually playing. I use my lazer more when playing than the Logix device as it much quicker. Then again, over the years, I have learned to be quite accurate when eyeballing distances. Accurate enough with the clubs I use anyways.

I don't know anything about Golf Shot.

Thanks, Patch.  It seems like the website for GolfShot is a bit better.  What did you do with your old Sky Caddie?

IDK about better, but it does have some nice features. The one thing I don't like about it is the requirement to manually enter the club distance data.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Skycaddie for me, even though they have dropped the ball a bit with the touch release.

I am assuming the other 2 are phone apps - the way I look at it, I paid around $250 for the skycaddie touch and paid over $900 for my phone.

That and my phone will not fit in any cart drink holders and is more likely to break than the skycaddie if I drop it.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I started with a SkyCaddie and then it sat for 4 years after my accident. I started back up with a Golf Logix or Swing by Swing but they are both battery killers on my phone. You would be pushing it to get a round in. I would also get random lockups using the phone apps. I also have a hard time seeing what is on the screen in the bright sun. The SG5 is quick and easy for me. Someday I might have a small laser and do away with the SkyCaddie.

Driver:  :nike:  Vapor Pro 9.5°  Wood & Hybrids : :nike:Covert Tour 13°, 18° & 21°
Irons & Wedges:
  :nike:  Covert 2.0  5i - AW,  :titleist:   56-14F,  60-07S
Putter:     :titleist:Newport Select
Balls:  :bridgestone: B330-RX


Posted

I have a Samsung Galaxy S3.   I've used both Golflogix and Golfshot.  I currently have a yearly paid subscription to both.  The jury is still out which one works best.    The UI for each is different and I guess it boils down to a personal preference.   One thing I do not like about Golfshot, if you have a round you want to enter manually, you have to do it in your phone, not online.   It would be much easier to enter the round via their website instead of the phone.   I started with Golflogix and in a bright sunlight the graphics are easier to see than the gps image that Golfshot uses.  Each keep track of data and give a relatively accurate distance to any location on the course.   Both have had any golf course in their database that I've played.

Per the battery issue.   My older S3 has a smaller battery than most of the newer android phones.   I never use all of the battery during a round.   Each app has suggestions to save your battery during a round and their suggestions make a big difference.   If battery issues are a problem with either app, there is an easy fix.

When I first starting using the apps, I went to Amazon and bought a battery extender.   I have a Duracell that will charge my phone if I decide to play 36.   It works great.

The thing I like about both apps, it lets me relive the round and look for areas of improvement.   Could I do that with a pencil and a score card?  Sure but it's easier with the apps.

If you have any questions about either app, I'll try to help.

Denny Jones

Davison, MI

  • Upvote 1

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Skycaddie for me, even though they have dropped the ball a bit with the touch release.

I am assuming the other 2 are phone apps - the way I look at it, I paid around $250 for the skycaddie touch and paid over $900 for my phone.

That and my phone will not fit in any cart drink holders and is more likely to break than the skycaddie if I drop it.

Kind of the same for me, I'm not into one device for all uses just yet.  I like having a specific device for golf.  It stays in my bag and has but one purpose.  It is also more suited to that one purpose than my phone, sometimes I play in the rain or other adverse conditions and my Skycaddie is more suited to those conditions than my phone.  I'm not a huge fan of the yearly subscription, but on the other hand, I did a 3 year membership, paid something like $100, which is like 2 greens fees.  So I figure I'll just skip playing 2 rounds of golf over the next 3 years to make up the difference.....yea.....right!

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Note: This thread is 3981 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.