Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3779 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duff McGee

False dichotomy fallacy.

Why not try to offer some assistance to whoever you were replying to, instead of showing off the new words you learned today while saying nothing intelligible?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac62

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Lee

So, everyone these days in on the custom-club-fitting bandwagon. However, I don't see much benefit.

I play golf with around 10 guys on a regular basis. All 10 have been fitted for clubs over the last 3 years. A few of these guys also spent roughly $600 for Edel putters, too.

And they have something else in common (other than custom fitted clubs)-

THEY ALL STILL SUCK AT GOLF.

It's damn funny when someone arrives at the course for the first time with their custom clubs and/or putter, only to watch them slice their drive OB, blade their mid irons, chunk wedges, and 3-putt with their $600 putters.

And they all say, "I love my new clubs/putter." But their scores suck.

Perhaps time and money would be better spent on lessons and time at the range, or practice green?

I'm 6'6" with a 35"/36" sleeve length.  I'll bet custom fitting makes a lot more difference to a guy like me than it does to a guy who's 5'9" and fits comfortably into standard length/lie clubs.  When I play off-the-rack clubs, I look like a baseball catcher squatting down to pick a ball up off the ground.

A lot more depends on how your body is proportioned than your height vs. arm length.  I am 6'2" with a 33" arm, but I also only have a 30" inseam, so I've been able to get away with a more or less standard length and lie.  I'm now awaiting delivery of my first set of fitted irons, but even after fitting, they are only 1/2" longer than standard, with only a 1 degree upright lie.  It's entirely possible that you may only need a lie adjustment, or only a minimal length increase - impossible to say just from a conversation.  A proper fitting may make quite a difference, or it may not - the clubfitter measures you just standing to see where your arms hang from the ground, and then makes makes some swing measurements as well.  During my fitting at Golfsmith, I probably hit 150 balls on the launch monitor along with the lie and impact tape measurements.

I have a 36" inseam.  I was fitted for my current irons at 5 degrees upright and +1 1/2" (using static measurements, a lie board and a launch monitor).  That's a pretty significant difference from off the rack clubs.

My point was simply that it's ridiculous to issue a blanket condemnation of custom fitting.  It's not a magic pill to fix a bad swing, but there are certainly many people who benefit from it.

No argument there - I've been basically saying the same thing.  When it doesn't add anything to the cost of the clubs, then why not take advantage of it?  Even if I had to play a bit more, I still would have had a fitting this time.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3779 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.