Jump to content
IGNORED

Driver woes - SOLVED!


RichF
Note: This thread is 6037 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I think....

Okay, latest update on my driver quandary. I went to my local golf-club tonight and had a custom-fitting/driver session to see what's up with me and my driver-woes:

So, out comes my own TaylorMade Burner , standard 46" shaft, Fujikura Re*Ax 50, 10.5° loft, 1.5° closed-face. Had 7 or 8 drives with it - maxed-out at 238 yards, slight fade off-centre, swing-speed at 85-88mph. (these results aren't surprising cos I've actually measured out my longest drive on the course with this and it was 247 yards.)

Then I tested a Titleist 907-D2 with Aldila VS-Proto 65 shaft - stiff, 9.5° loft. (so I'm moving up from Regular to Stiff with a shaft weighing 15g more).
Results: 10 drives, maxed-out at 262 yards, most of which had either a slight draw or fade to them (that's okay cos I know this is a 'workable' driver). Max swing-speed 94mph.

Next up, Callway FT-i Tour - Fujikura 686 shaft, again stiff, 9.5° loft with the 0.5 open face (so again, this is a 15g heavier shaft with stiff flex) - this baby blew everything away: 15 drives, longest being 268yards, ALL STRAIGHT, shortest at 229 yards (pulled left off the heel). Swing-speed: 98mph?!?

What's happening here???? Two months ago I was told that my club-head speed would be best suited to Regular-flex shats and furthermore, I wasn't good enough to use the 907-D2!!
Even weirder: isn't the FT-i meant to sacrifice distance???

TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Any chance you just got loosened up as the test went on? Should have re-hit the Burner at the end.

Nothing in the swing is done at the expense of balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Any chance you just got loosened up as the test went on? Should have re-hit the Burner at the end.

I've had the Burner for 2 months and the results have been pretty identical on the driving-range/course: distance and trajectory have been pretty consistent.

Still doesn't explain why I swing faster and get more distance with a stiffer/heavier shaft -that's what's confusing.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's not all about weight. Sometimes a heavier shaft just feels more comfortable and works better with your individual swing. The FT-i and FT-i tour have a 45.75" shaft by the way. That's one of the things the Callaway rep mentioned when he was telling us about the driver. By expanding out the back of the club, the stability is increased, but at the expense usually some distance is lost and accuracy gained. To offset that, they extended the shaft in an effort to gain some of the lost distance back and figured that 3/4" was the optimal balance between distance gain before accuracy was sacrificed too much. As for why the swing speed went up, no idea, that's probably more of a mental thing than anything else. It could also be just that the heavier shaft and different balance just felt more comfortable and enabled your swing to proceed naturally instead of fighting itself for whatever reason the Burner has been relatively unsuccessful. I'm currently playing a 55g shaft in my driver, but after hitting some other shafts, I found that the results I got were more consistent with a heavier shaft. Whatever it is about the setup just works better for the way my swing is. I have a 75g shaft sitting around waiting to be put into the driver but I haven't had a chance to do it yet.

New Driver Ordered
New 3 Wood Ordered
Two New Hybrids Ordered
I-701 Irons 5-PW w/ Rifle 5.0
Callaway X-Forged Vintage Wedges 50/12, 54/14, 58/10 (C-Grind Sole) w/ Rifle 5.5Yes! Marilyn 33" Z-URS ||| SkyCaddie SG 2.5 ||| Clicgear Model 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites


First, sounds like you had a good experience on the range. That is always fun. Also, the D2 is very good driver and easy to keep in the center so I don't know who gave you the impression you weren't ready for it. The FT-i is a high MOI driver and it isn't designed to be shorter or be a compromise driver at all. It is perhaps not as workable as the FT-5 or the D2 but it is just as long or close to it and it gives better distance on off center hits than those other drivers. All are great drivers including your TM Burner.

Some pro's will only hit a new driver maybe 4 times before deciding whether to pursue it or forget it. The right combo can make a huge difference without any swing change. It sounds like you found a head and shaft combination that really works for you and that is a great event for anyone. It doesn't mean the FT-i is a better driver, just that you may have found a combo that optimizes your swing. Keep experimenting and enjoy.

By the way, with those distance variables I would hazard that making consistent center contact with the driver is a bit of a problem for you right now. We all sometimes have that particular problem, especially when trying to hit the ball farther. On some drivers, a 1/2 inch miss can result in a 40 yard drop off. Again, the FT-i is specifically designed to minimize distance loss on off center hits. It may be a great club for your current swing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's not all about weight. Sometimes a heavier shaft just feels more comfortable and works better with your individual swing. The FT-i and FT-i tour have a 45.75" shaft by the way. That's one of the things the Callaway rep mentioned when he was telling us about the driver. By expanding out the back of the club, the stability is increased, but at the expense usually some distance is lost and accuracy gained. To offset that, they extended the shaft in an effort to gain some of the lost distance back and figured that 3/4" was the optimal balance between distance gain before accuracy was sacrificed too much. As for why the swing speed went up, no idea, that's probably more of a mental thing than anything else. It could also be just that the heavier shaft and different balance just felt more comfortable and enabled your swing to proceed naturally instead of fighting itself for whatever reason the Burner has been relatively unsuccessful. I'm currently playing a 55g shaft in my driver, but after hitting some other shafts, I found that the results I got were more consistent with a heavier shaft. Whatever it is about the setup just works better for the way my swing is. I have a 75g shaft sitting around waiting to be put into the driver but I haven't had a chance to do it yet.

Thing is, I was sold on the Titleist 907-D2 with the stiff-flex shaft....my drives were straighter and around 10 yards further than the Burner.

However, when I then tested the FT-i Tour, I really wasn't expecting this to perform any better (in fact, I'd demo'd it a few weeks back and wasn't that impressed with the distance-loss, mind you, this was a standard, off-the-shelf FT-i weith regular Speeder shaft). I'm really surprised at my results with the FT-i tour, but as has been pointed out, the shaft more than anything accounts for the drastic changes.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


First, sounds like you had a good experience on the range. That is always fun. Also, the D2 is very good driver and easy to keep in the center so I don't know who gave you the impression you weren't ready for it. The FT-i is a high MOI driver and it isn't designed to be shorter or be a compromise driver at all. It is perhaps not as workable as the FT-5 or the D2 but it is just as long or close to it and it gives better distance on off center hits than those other drivers. All are great drivers including your TM Burner.

The driving-range session after the custom-fit was good - to be honest, apart from the price, the results from the 907-D2 and FT-i Tour are also minimal....contact felt better with the Titleist and I could see with the flight-direction why people would use this to 'work' the ball.

The FT-i did was it syas on the tin: very straight....and the more I relaxed and hit through the ball, the more distance I got with this. I'm taking them both out onto the 9-hole course today for further testing.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6037 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Its simple, YOU are responsible for reporting YOUR score correctly, at every level of golf.  Do you imagine a top pro would really trust anyone else with his score? Without getting too far from the original post, the Rules have been revised every 4 years for decades.  They're continually evaluated, and most changes are in response to changes within the game.  BTW, if wind blows your ball off the green before you've lifted and replaced it, you play from wherever it ends up.  The TV call ins weren't a rule of golf issue, they were a PGA Tour issue, all in an effort to get the call right.  
    • Someone asked what I propose. I think if the bunker is full of rainwater, you get to drop it with no penalty directly in back of the bunker, so you still have a tricky shot of chipping over the bunker. People are talking about local committees and such which we just don’t have at our level. My league and playing partners gave the free drop with no issue. My original purpose of this post was just to understand what the “real” rule is, and I now know. But now I also want to encourage people to see that many long time golf rules are outdated and illogical, and hopefully encourage people to push for change. They made some changes in the last few years, so I’m hopeful the game I love will improve if enough people speak out. A lot to hope for posting in a little forum I know, but you have to start somewhere.
    • You get a penalty stroke because your local committee didn't do their job, they didn't address the specific conditions using the tools available to them within the Rules.  The rulemakers contemplated just this situation, bunkers being so filled with Temporary Water that they're unplayable.  The only way to address it "fairly" is to allow free relief outside the bunker, and they do NOT want to allow that on an everyday basis.  So they write the rules as it is, and allow the Committee to override the normal rule in the rare instance where the bunker really is full.  That's what your "local league" does, they invoke Model Local Rule F-16, which treats flooded bunkers as both GUR and as General Area.  Relief from GUR in the General Area allows relief in the General Area (i.e. outside the re-defined bunker).  Its quite a logical way to approach a relatively rare situation. Separately, consider your concern about temporary Water in the fairway.  I've seen situations in relatively level fairways where the Nearest Point of Complete Relief  from Temporary Water is 30 or 40 yards away, further from the green, even in the rough.   
    • There you go, @yungbuck6. Your hips aren’t really shifted forward and your head tips back. The camera angle isn’t good so what looks like hip slide could actually just be extension towards the ball.
    • But there's more to weight shift than just where you finish. How your weight transfers throughout the swing matters too.  But you're saying you can see it better than a device that can measure it? Got it.  Yeah I'm good here, good luck to whoever tries to coach you. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...