Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Competitiveness Seen as a Virtue, at Least for Men [NYT]


Note: This thread is 3668 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

NYT talks about double standards for women w/respect to competitiveness. Recaps the Suzann Petterson Solheim cup incident and compares her competitiveness to Phil Mickelson's during the Ryder Cup when he made that gave away two holes statement. 

Quote

To be a female athlete is to be ever mindful that appearances matter. Prettiness is next to godliness, which is why many of the players wear makeup during tournaments and treat their competitiveness as an imperfection that needs to be covered up with hugs and smiles. The same icy stare that identifies Tiger Woods as a fierce competitor is off-putting when it freezes Pettersen’s opponents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/20/sports/golf/suzann-pettersens-competitiveness-is-not-seen-as-the-virtue-it-is-for-men.html?smid=tw-nytsports&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Here's a trailer for the documentary mentioned:

 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Petterson Solheim to Mickelson Pres. Cup (not Ryder Cup ;)) is a silly comparison.  She made a poor judgment during competition that would have been viewed equally as bad if done by a man.  She was not roasted for that decision for being female, she was roasted for getting too caught up in the moment and basically being a jerk.

Mickelson was just running his mouth during a press conference.  It's not the gender that might make the reaction to that different for different people, its personality.  Mickelson or Petterson says it, and it's not unexpected ... InBee Park or Chris Kirk says it, and its a little shocking.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Golfingdad said:

Petterson Solheim to Mickelson Pres. Cup (not Ryder Cup ;)) is a silly comparison.  She made a poor judgment during competition that would have been viewed equally as bad if done by a man.  She was not roasted for that decision for being female, she was roasted for getting too caught up in the moment and basically being a jerk.

I agree.

I also agree that women are slighted for being "competitive" and cannot stand the hugging and all that. The guys will root on their friends, but half the time they'll just say it to a reporter a week later, a "Yeah I was happy to see (player) get one there. He's been working hard on his game. Now I'm gonna go try to beat him."

I get that hugs are like handshakes, but not really…

My daughter is more competitive than most. I like that about her.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, Golfingdad said:

Petterson Solheim to Mickelson Pres. Cup (not Ryder Cup ;)) is a silly comparison.

Yeah that's a crappy comparison.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3668 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.