Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3504 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, natureboy said:

For his club speed the Flightscope and Trackman optimizers I saw indicated his spin is a little low.

Not really. Using Flighscope Trajectory Optimizer
 

140 mph ball speed, 15 launch angle, 2100 rpm spin = 237 carry
140 mph ball speed, 15 launch angle, 2600 rpm spin = 237 carry 
140 mph ball speed, 17 launch angle, 2100 rpm spin = 240 carry
140 mph ball speed, 17 launch angle, 2600 rpm spin = 239 carry

He's basically in the realm of not getting much else out of his driver. We are talking about 1.2% here. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Not really. Using Flighscope Trajectory Optimizer

140 mph ball speed, 15 launch angle, 2100 rpm spin = 237 carry
140 mph ball speed, 15 launch angle, 2600 rpm spin = 237 carry 
140 mph ball speed, 17 launch angle, 2100 rpm spin = 240 carry
140 mph ball speed, 17 launch angle, 2600 rpm spin = 239 carry

He's basically in the realm of not getting much else out of his driver. We are talking about 1.2% here. 

I guess you are looking at more of his speed 'potential'. He said his average was more around 137 ball speed and once got it to 144. Even so his reported average carry is longer than the Flightscope model carries in your post. Maybe he had some altitude? Fair point that he's pretty close to optimal in both models

If you use the averages / medians he stated:

137 mph, 16.5 launch, 2325 spin = 231 carry, 240 total.

If you go by Trackman and his average swing speed of ~ 93 mph that model indicates his spin range (not his max) may be a hair on the low side of optimal with a very positive AoA, but yes still quite close on the launch and spin.

Trackman carry optimizer.PNG

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
8 hours ago, natureboy said:

If you go by Trackman and his average swing speed of ~ 93 mph that model indicates his spin range (not his max) may be a hair on the low side of optimal with a very positive AoA, but yes still quite close on the launch and spin.

Trackman carry optimizer.PNG

I plugged in some numbers into flightscope,

107 ball speed, 15 degrees launch angle, 3100 spin = 154 Carry
107 ball speed, 19 degrees launch angle, 2500 spin = 161 Carry
107 ball speed, 21 degrees launch angle, 1900 spin = 165 Carry

I think once you get a high enough launch angle the spin rates do not matter as much for low swing speeds (see below)

19 degree launch angle at 3100 spin = 159 carry
19 degree launch angle at 2100 spin = 163 carry

1000 rpm only means 4 yards of difference for a 107 ball speed.

If you do that for a guy with a 165 ball speed then you will see a drop of 8 yards. Even then that is not as substantial if you turn the difference into high launch / low spin versus low launch / high spin.

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

These numbers came from a pretty beat up CG2. I wouldn't put a lot of stock in the precise accuracy, but just general overall.

It told me what I was thinking but didn't want to believe.  My club head speed had fallen. 62 years of age and haven't really played in a couple of years.  Just getting back into it.

Also I was averaging just the best shots in my head, the numbers might be(probably) are off a bit.

 

 


Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, saevel25 said:

I plugged in some numbers into flightscope,

107 ball speed, 15 degrees launch angle, 3100 spin = 154 Carry
107 ball speed, 19 degrees launch angle, 2500 spin = 161 Carry
107 ball speed, 21 degrees launch angle, 1900 spin = 165 Carry

I think once you get a high enough launch angle the spin rates do not matter as much for low swing speeds (see below)

19 degree launch angle at 3100 spin = 159 carry
19 degree launch angle at 2100 spin = 163 carry

1000 rpm only means 4 yards of difference for a 107 ball speed.

If you do that for a guy with a 165 ball speed then you will see a drop of 8 yards. Even then that is not as substantial if you turn the difference into high launch / low spin versus low launch / high spin.

 

How comfortable is it to get up to a 19 or 21 degree launch angle with a relatively low loft driver? It would seem you'd need to tee high and really come up from underneath the ball? Asking only because I've never had a launch monitor to play with in this way and I would think at a certain amount of upward AoA it might become harder to apply a solid hit or generate / maintain SS.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted

I use 3 1/4" tees and tee is as high as I can.  You HAVE to make a correct swing.  If you release early, it drop kick city.

I had trouble, at least for the first 8-10 balls on the monitor because they had a rubber tee in the matt. I was hitting thin.  I brought some tees, but this wasn't the tee holding kind of rubber.  I finally broke off a couple of tees and stuffed them down the rubber tee and it would grab the full tee then.

Other than that, it's comfortable to me.

I tee it up so the ball is almost all the way over the driver head, about a 1/4 of it below top of head. Also, tee it off the front big toe.

However, with my time running out, I moved the ball back to my right arm/shoulder(lefty) and seemed to gain a few mph on the swing, so there might be something to losing speed way out there on the toe.  Maybe because my club head is about even with my hands then and the release has expended itself instead of still releasing at the closer point. Didn't get to play with that, that much. Something I've got to explore a little more.


Note: This thread is 3504 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.