Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Wedge yardage correlation to Driver yardage?


Note: This thread is 3533 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

We have a kid at our club who is a good player and competes in amateur events and he is long. Driver consistently over 300 yards . On one of our really short par 3 ...140 yards downhill he will swing soft lt looks like he's baby pitches his wedge . He will swing a lot slower but smoother under 140 yards as I believe his full wedge goes 150.

Edited by dchoye

Posted
1 hour ago, Golfingdad said:

Sorry, I used the wrong word ... should have said swing dynamics, not mechanics.  Was just saying that @mchepp had the best answer.

Ah, makes sense. Yeah, I agree 100% with that! Interesting that some people can expect to hit a wedge a certain distance, because it seems like other than on the range it's mostly just a feel thing for me inside 120 yards.

OTOH, I still have a long way to go on improving my swing mechanics. Maybe I'll be better at getting exact distances through pure mechanics by the time I'm 55 and ready to play the seniors in SCGA. :-D

 

1 hour ago, No Mulligans said:

Not sure you should use GG average for a full wedge distance.  If you are like me, you have a range of swings you use with your wedge, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, full... As such my full SW shots represent less than 25% of my SW swings.  This all messes up the GG stats.

I typically just ignore my wedge distances since they are not critical in the sense that they would be hit X yards or something like that. If I am inside 120 yards it has to be by feel most of the time. Every time I try to take a full swing with a 60 or anything else that is high lofted the results is typically a thin bladed shot except those perfect shots on a range mat or fluffy grass.

 

8 minutes ago, dchoye said:

We have a kid at our club who is a good player and competes in amateur events and he is long. Driver consistently over 300 yards . On one of our really short par 3 ...140 yards downhill he will swing soft lt looks like he's baby pitches his wedge . He will swing a lot slower but smoother under 140 yards as I believe his full wedge goes 150.

Yeah, I know all about the young kids at clubs who hit 150 yard PW. We have many more than one. :-D

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3533 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 5/6* ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Now we’re getting all science-y.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.