Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3320 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, Lagavulin62 said:

You guys and your wedges. Could it be if we worked more on our 200 to 150 approach ranges we wouldn't need a bag nearly half full of wedges? 

You are right that I am not at the point where I need to get specialized wedges, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this.

Also, thinking about the various equipment setups is fun for me


Posted

A used lob wedge is not going to kill you. I love mine, one of the most useful clubs I have. I never hit it full swing either.

Of course, if I could reliably hit all my approach shots I could lose a wedge and bag something more interesting. For now I need those "scalpels" to get out of, over, and around all the mounds, bunkers, and long grass the architects so lovingly placed all around the greens.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
17 hours ago, Lagavulin62 said:

You guys and your wedges. Could it be if we worked more on our 200 to 150 approach ranges we wouldn't need a bag nearly half full of wedges? 

The problem as I see it is the manufacturers.  In order to be able to advertise that their 5 iron goes further than your current 5-iron, they strengthen the loft so it plays like a 4 iron.  After 30 years or more of this trend, a 5-iron is more like a really old 3-iron, the pitching wedge is like an old 8, and there's nothing in the standard set for shorter shots.  so we take the 2 and 3 and even 4 irons out of the bag, and replace them with wedges, and end up right where we started, the same set of lofted clubs, just with different labels.

Besides, even the best players in the world miss a lot of greens from 150 yards and out, the rest of us mortals certainly aren't going to eliminate the need for short-game tools any time soon.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

The problem as I see it is the manufacturers.  In order to be able to advertise that their 5 iron goes further than your current 5-iron, they strengthen the loft so it plays like a 4 iron.  After 30 years or more of this trend, a 5-iron is more like a really old 3-iron, the pitching wedge is like an old 8, and there's nothing in the standard set for shorter shots.  so we take the 2 and 3 and even 4 irons out of the bag, and replace them with wedges, and end up right where we started, the same set of lofted clubs, just with different labels.

Besides, even the best players in the world miss a lot of greens from 150 yards and out, the rest of us mortals certainly aren't going to eliminate the need for short-game tools any time soon.

haha, this makes a lot of sense. Better to focus on the distance itself rather than the 'name' of the club. As the trend inevitably continues, I wouldn't be surprised to see a 5th wedge eventually. I wonder what their marketing genius will decide to name it


  • Moderator
Posted
5 minutes ago, VeryShagadelic said:

haha, this makes a lot of sense. Better to focus on the distance itself rather than the 'name' of the club. As the trend inevitably continues, I wouldn't be surprised to see a 5th wedge eventually. I wonder what their marketing genius will decide to name it

The 2 iron

After all, nobody will be carrying one any more, so the name will be available

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, VeryShagadelic said:

haha, this makes a lot of sense. Better to focus on the distance itself rather than the 'name' of the club. As the trend inevitably continues, I wouldn't be surprised to see a 5th wedge eventually. I wonder what their marketing genius will decide to name it

True, and by my calculations I have the equivalent of 3 wedges. (9, wedge, and sw). If we have the clubs through 50 loft and a sand wedge we should be covered, unless we just want specialization. I agree with you that the manufacturers are just attempting to sell us less of a set for the same price. 

OP, sorry if you thought I was advising you personally and indirectly making some  judgement of your needs. I don't support that and my thing is only you know whats best for you.

No I was addressing all of us in that regards. Meaning all of us have a range we are comfortable in, regardless of our handicap or experience.  Some its 150, others 100, etc. Practically all of us can develop some form of competence with 8-wedge. So I just meant if we feel a problem is occurring consistently within that range, maybe the issue is not club related? If I hit a 5 iron 170 yards out and muff the shot, making my next shot a half wedge into the green, my problem is not needing a higher lofted wedge. I just need to work on my 5 iron. That's what I meant by working on 200-150 range shots. 

But it could be a club management issue? Meaning if I continually find myself needing a half wedge into a short par 4, I may need to tee off with a 3 wood instead of driver. (A problem I only wish I had often) 

Now I realize many times its just a matter of advancing every shot as far as possible and when we finally get within confidence club range there is no judging what the distance will be. But still my position is that no matter how many wedges we carry, we still won't have the correct loft when we need it. So we are back to creating the right shot. And thats ok because it's nice to hit a shot you at least know is within range. 

And after all of that I completely understand the experimenting and wanting everything out there? It's always fun to add a new tool. 

 

 

 

 

Dave my first paragraph was addressed to you. The rest to the OP.  I thought I selected the right quote.  Lol


Posted
20 hours ago, Lagavulin62 said:

True, and by my calculations I have the equivalent of 3 wedges. (9, wedge, and sw). If we have the clubs through 50 loft and a sand wedge we should be covered, unless we just want specialization. I agree with you that the manufacturers are just attempting to sell us less of a set for the same price. 

OP, sorry if you thought I was advising you personally and indirectly making some  judgement of your needs. I don't support that and my thing is only you know whats best for you.

No I was addressing all of us in that regards. Meaning all of us have a range we are comfortable in, regardless of our handicap or experience.  Some its 150, others 100, etc. Practically all of us can develop some form of competence with 8-wedge. So I just meant if we feel a problem is occurring consistently within that range, maybe the issue is not club related? If I hit a 5 iron 170 yards out and muff the shot, making my next shot a half wedge into the green, my problem is not needing a higher lofted wedge. I just need to work on my 5 iron. That's what I meant by working on 200-150 range shots. 

But it could be a club management issue? Meaning if I continually find myself needing a half wedge into a short par 4, I may need to tee off with a 3 wood instead of driver. (A problem I only wish I had often) 

Now I realize many times its just a matter of advancing every shot as far as possible and when we finally get within confidence club range there is no judging what the distance will be. But still my position is that no matter how many wedges we carry, we still won't have the correct loft when we need it. So we are back to creating the right shot. And thats ok because it's nice to hit a shot you at least know is within range. 

And after all of that I completely understand the experimenting and wanting everything out there? It's always fun to add a new tool. 

 

 

 

 

Dave my first paragraph was addressed to you. The rest to the OP.  I thought I selected the right quote.  Lol

Great points. I think for now I am going to sit tight on my current setup and work on figuring out my average distance with my clubs. Once I have a solid base of ranges, I will revisit adding some new tools to play with

  • Upvote 1

Note: This thread is 3320 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.