Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3254 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

"After I sawed down the hosels on my irons and  added some lead tape here and there, they were like magic! I got on the hottest streak of my career." (Johnny Miller)

One of my cherished projects for the new year is recovering a set of MacGregor Tourney Custom irons. As they have extra long hosels and feel too heavy, the first thing it occurred me was also sawing down the hosels, maybe drilling the bores a little deeper...

Speaking in general terms, in which ways would this affect flex, COG and sweetspot location, swingweight, kick/bend point, clubhead feel etc? 

I thought of replacing the original shafts with TT DG Lites R-400 that are 18 grams lighter. Extracting 20 to 30 grams (10 to 15 dime coins) from the hosels would be too much? I guess Miller did it all by pure feeling...

Thx for any suggestions. 

 

 

Mac_TC7 copy.jpg


Posted

perhaps you have the wrong clubs

In my bag (Motocaddy Light)

Taylormade Burner driver, Taylormade 4 wood, 3 x Ping Karsten Hybrids, 6-SW Ping Karsten irons with reg flex graphite shafts. Odyssey putter, 20 Bridgestone e6 balls, 2 water balls for the 5th hole, loads of tees, 2 golf gloves, a couple of hand warmers, cleaning towel, 5 ball markers, 2 pitch mark repairers, some aspirin, 3 hats, set of waterproofs, an umbrella, a pair of gaiters, 2 pairs of glasses. Christ, it's amazing I can pick the bloody thing up !!


Posted

Unless you are a professional clubmaker, or a professional golfer, it sounds to me like you are about to ruin a vintage set of MacGregor Tourney Custom irons!

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Unless you are a professional clubmaker, or a professional golfer, it sounds to me like you are about to ruin a vintage set of MacGregor Tourney Custom irons!

Even then.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
54 minutes ago, Secretariat said:

Maybe I should have put the question in other terms: what happens when you shorten the hosel of a golf club? 

Ha!  Yeah, you probably would have gotten better initial answers!  :-)

Not to worry, I'm sure there are a few club makers out here who can help.  Calling @WUTiger....

  • Upvote 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, David in FL said:

Ha!  Yeah, you probably would have gotten better initial answers!  :-)

Not to worry, I'm sure there are a few club makers out here who can help.  Calling @WUTiger....

Thx DAVID IN FL, suggestions or even references (I have searched the site in vain, but then I'm a newbie), wd be greatly appreciated! 

I can feel the golf club, and I'm sure these irons will play even better [for me] with a bit less weight. "How much?" is the question.


Posted

The answer to your question "What happens when you shorten the hosel?" is as follows.  The weight of the head is reduced.  Swing weight is reduced.  The COG moves away from wherever the removed weight was and the shaft, assuming it is the same one, will flex less.  In addition, the hosel bore may require modification; which can be a serious problem if the bores are tapered rather than parallel.                              Miller had to apply lead tape (a LOT of lead tape) to make the clubs playable.  In essence: he removed weight from one area and put it back on elsewhere.  If your goal is to make the clubs lighter; Miller's procedure is unlikely to accomplish that goal.  

  • Upvote 1

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 minutes ago, Piz said:

The answer to your question "What happens when you shorten the hosel?" is as follows.  The weight of the head is reduced.  Swing weight is reduced.  The COG moves away from wherever the removed weight was and the shaft, assuming it is the same one, will flex less.  In addition, the hosel bore may require modification; which can be a serious problem if the bores are tapered rather than parallel.                              Miller had to apply lead tape (a LOT of lead tape) to make the clubs playable.  In essence: he removed weight from one area and put it back on elsewhere.  If your goal is to make the clubs lighter; Miller's procedure is unlikely to accomplish that goal.  

Thx for clarifying, Piz.

In an interesting article published in 

http://www.golf.com/equipment/johnny-miller-1973-us-open-golf-equipment-macgregor-wilson

Miller says, "I cut the irons [' hosels] and reground the bottoms [soles] and the top. You didn't have much club left, so they had to have a lot of lead tape to bring them up [to proper swingweight numbers]."

A more cautious approach, I guess, wd be simply installing lighter shafts? 

 

 

 


Posted

Yes, and the next question would be...How much lighter can the shaft be?  To answer that you will first have to determine the weight of the shafts that are in there now, and compare those numbers to what is available.  Old as those clubs are; I'd bet they have tapered bores.  Let's assume that is true, for the moment, and see where that leads us.  An R-flex, Dynamic Gold, taper-tipped, iron shaft, weighs 127 grams.  An R-flex, Dynamic Gold SL, weighs 104 grams.  That is certainly enough to make some difference.  Whether it is enough to justify the expenditure, for you, is a question I cannot answer.  PS.  The numbers will be different for parallel bores as the shafts come in raw rather than pre-cut lengths and get progressively lighter (approx. 1.5 grams) for each 1/2 inch reduction in length.  

  • Upvote 2

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Those are some sweet sticks; good luck working on them.

  • Upvote 1

Carry on my wayward drive

There'll be pars when you are done

Lay your weary wedge to rest

Don't you shank no more 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

They are forged irons tapered bore, equipped with DG R-300 weighing 127 gr. 

PW weighs 475 gr with grip installed, clubhead only 260 gr. 

Set swingweight averages D 1.0. PW = C 9.7 approximately. 

PW hosel lenght = 3.40". Bottom of bore to ground = 2.0". Hosel depth = 1.40". 

I wonder, how does the math work?

Supposing that R-300, DG SL shafts weighing 104 grams are installed, will the weight subtracted (23gr) correspond to minus 11 points in SW, effectively reducing the SW from D 1.0 to B 9.0 ?!?

Thx for any clues.  

 


Posted

I agree those are sweet-looking irons. Might be a shame to spoil the clean lines.

As far as what Miller did, my speculation would be that by cutting down the hosel and re-weighting with tape he moved the CoG out away from the heel toward the toe a bit and likely lower vertically toward the sole (higher launch). Kind of what modern club design shoots for (at least in longer irons). If he did it through the bag it might not have been an edge with shorter clubs where the goal is often to flight them lower, but may have worked with his goals and individual swing.

  • Upvote 1

Kevin


Posted

I played MacGregor MT irons from 1974 to 1994 - with MacGregor-2 stiff shafts. The clubfitter for my follow-on set suggested I just keep the MTs - and the matching driver and woods - for historical purposes. I'm glad I did.

That said, please don't cut up the MacGregor Tourney Custom irons!  This would be like taking a 1975 Corvette Stingray, and swapping in a 230 cu. in. straight six engine from a Chevy Nova so you can get better gas mileage.

Keep those MTCs as is, and compare them to modern clubs in side-by-side tests on the launch monitor.

If you must cut, look for a single club or two (maybe 5i and 7i) from the Tourney Custom line - check Clubfinders - and experiment with them.

  • Upvote 1

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 1/5/2017 at 10:17 PM, WUTiger said:

I played MacGregor MT irons from 1974 to 1994 - with MacGregor-2 stiff shafts. The clubfitter for my follow-on set suggested I just keep the MTs - and the matching driver and woods - for historical purposes. I'm glad I did.

That said, please don't cut up the MacGregor Tourney Custom irons!  This would be like taking a 1975 Corvette Stingray, and swapping in a 230 cu. in. straight six engine from a Chevy Nova so you can get better gas mileage.

Keep those MTCs as is, and compare them to modern clubs in side-by-side tests on the launch monitor.

If you must cut, look for a single club or two (maybe 5i and 7i) from the Tourney Custom line - check Clubfinders - and experiment with them.

Thank you, WUTiger! I thought I was right!

There can't be too many of those sets of clubs around any more. They're probably more valuable as golf memorabilia than as current playing clubs, but God knows I'd love to swing them!

There's a course a little way from me that has a set of MacGregor clubs in a walnut and glass presentation case hanging on the wall. The brass placard reads "Presented to Jack Nicklaus on the occasion of his 3rd Masters win."

How this came to be there I have no idea. I asked the guy behind the counter, but he didn't know. He told me the course owner hung them on the wall.

Yes, they're old style clubs. Forged muscle backs with big hosels, stainles steel shafts, leather wrap grips. Persimmon woods with brass inserts. And the whole set just shone like a box full of jewels!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 06/01/2017 at 1:17 AM, WUTiger said:

don't cut up the MacGregor Tourney Custom irons!  

 

10 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Thank you, WUTiger! I thought I was right!

Thx for the advice.

You make me feel like I'm changing Mona Lisa's hair dress, or turning a Cadillac into a drag racer!


Posted

That's kind of the thing, Secretariat. If you had other sets of the same kind of clubs to "experiment" on, it wouldn't be such a big deal. But these sound like collector's items!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3254 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.