Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1413 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

You’re missing my point.

You steepen significantly from that position. You almost have to.

If you attempt to get shallow too early, you’re going to steepen. If you’re steepening as you are in the downswing A6 might look okay but it’s functionally poor.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Practiced 3 hours on Tuesday indoors, also had access to Trackman and testing a g425 lst with an xstiff shaft. Managed to hit 117.5 clubhead speed. 
 

Today I probably played one of the last rounds this season, played a longish course and shot 88. My putting was horrible and I had 1 water hazard penalty and one ball OB, plan for next season is to break 80, as this year I finally broke 90 for the first time and did it regularly. 
 

I will be working on my full swing and putting over the winter and then I will be drilling my short game and yardages as soon as spring season starts. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 months later...
Posted

So spring has come. I did like I said I would and worked a lot on my swing and my putting. The lag putting has been great the last few rounds but I still need to drill the 5-12’ more. I did a lot of practicing on a 12” mat but without a proper hole it’s just that more difficult but I’ll work on that outside in the coming month. 
 

I have only done 1 outside pitching session maping out my grid and it already showed some effects on the course. Will now have to focus on chipping and pitching for the next month or two if I want a real shot at breaking 80 this year. I have ordered a mevo from ebay but I’m still waiting on it. The main use of it will be exactly this - pitching from 100 meters in. 
 

I did however still work a lot on my swing outside and finally I figured out the proper tempo. And it was somewhere around what I thought my slowest possible tempo is, and then half of that 😁I do not yet know where to add speed with such a tempo though but since I have no trouble hitting it far that’s a problem I’ll solve over the next winter.

 

Finally had a fitting for a driver today. I’m going with the Ping G425 max with the Ping tour x-stiff shaft and a ping gold grip (one size larger than regular). 
 

These were all my on course swings, didn’t jump out of my shoes (max speed I got in the winter was 118.5mph), but with the new tempo. The fitter did keep me changing a lot so that’s why I was spraying it a bit but in the end the neutral setting looked best. Will play around with it myself once I get the driver. The good thing is that our club is the Ping dealer so I can easily try other shafts if I want. But with this setup I was consistently carrying the ball over 270 and I hope I can carry this over to the course where my old driver was much less consistent in the length category, or better said it punished me much more in distance on mishits.

 

51F216B5-E127-4EF7-9147-CC9855C94422.jpeg

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

The new driver is in the bag and I have not been recording my swing for the past few months. The game is definitely good enough to smash 80 but I just need a couple of things to fall into place. Working on the tempo and smoothness of my full swing (think Couples) with the principles of dr. Kwon I have now moved to a draw being my primary shot shape. If I shallow out too much I get too much of a hook so I’m not actively shallowing anymore. The main problem is that I still have a two way miss, but the miss to the right is a straight push so I can account for that. Been working on my short game a bit, greenside shots, longer putts. I was on summer vacation for 2 weeks so no golfing was done, but now the plan is to get my wedges dialed in with my Mevo. That’s the only reason I bought it, now I just need to put the work in. 
 

The new driver is working, have broken some distance records on the course, all in all it was a good purchase. Went out yesterday by myself, it was way too hot to play but I decided to do the back 9 after I shot 42 on the front. Shot 41 on the back 9 and the golf that I was playing was really far from good. Only got 1 birdie and I had 3 or 4 that barely missed. Also my only 3 putt (was a 4 putt) came on a sloping green where I rushed the putts as the players behind were waiting. 
 

The worst thing about the round was that this course has 6 par 5s and 4 of them are really reachable(and 2 are really tough both curving two ways, being true 3 shot par 5s most of the time), and my scores were double, birdie, triple, triple, bogey and par. So instead of shooting under par or at least even I managed to go +8 on the par 5s which is disgusting and that’s no way to break 80. 
 

Driving the ball 300-320yards does do a lot to lowering the scores.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1413 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.