Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

If I am pulling and hooking would it be easier to turn that into a fade, draw or try to get it straight? My club I did get fitted and it is set 2 degrees open


Posted
9 minutes ago, adi2008 said:

If I am pulling and hooking would it be easier to turn that into a fade, draw or try to get it straight? My club I did get fitted and it is set 2 degrees open

I think going to the range and getting a consistent setup ( feet, shoulder, club address, distance to the ball) and hitting a few buckets will give you the right answer. the perfect scenario is hitting a straight ball however for me , I have a slight draw and I learned to just play it , it isn't much so with shorter irons its almost straight but with longer irons I aim a few yards right of my target. for me alignment dictates what I'm going to hit but my shoulders play a big role, sometimes it feels like I'm parallel when in reality my shoulders are open resulting in a hook or pull draw. hope this helps


Posted
2 hours ago, ncates00 said:

Depends on the amount of curve.  It's subjective, but I'd call a draw that curves more than 20 yards a hook (or fades more than 20 yards a slice).  

You had it right at the start of your reply.  Start line just refers to the push/pull description as you'd see on a gc2 for example.  That by itself doesn't classify it as a hook or a slice.  Say you started the ball -1* left but only curved the ball 5 yards- that's not a hook.  That's a pull draw. 

If you started the ball 20 yards left and curved the ball 5 yards left, most people would call that a hook, when in reality its a pull draw. Obviously someone like yourself who is more knowledgeable and owns a launch monitor would be more likely to call it a pull draw, but most people would call that a hook. If you started the ball 20 yards right and curved it 25 yards left and it ended up in the left half of the fairway, most people are going to call that a draw, when in reality its a hook (based on your definition of a hook) that just had a different start line.

That's all I'm trying to say, is that start line influences what shot shape people think they hit.

 

11 minutes ago, adi2008 said:

If I am pulling and hooking would it be easier to turn that into a fade, draw or try to get it straight? My club I did get fitted and it is set 2 degrees open

It's difficult to say without club path and face numbers, but assuming your swing path for both the pulls and the hooks is out to in, if your face was more open at impact with that same out to in path, you'd start hitting pull fades which should start left of target and fade back towards target. Again, without seeing any numbers about your path, I would think it would require more of a drastic change on your part to start hitting pushes/push-draws than it would to start hitting pull-fades.

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, klineka said:

If you started the ball 20 yards left and curved the ball 5 yards left, most people would call that a hook, when in reality its a pull draw. Obviously someone like yourself who is more knowledgeable and owns a launch monitor would be more likely to call it a pull draw, but most people would call that a hook. If you started the ball 20 yards right and curved it 25 yards left and it ended up in the left half of the fairway, most people are going to call that a draw, when in reality its a hook (based on your definition of a hook) that just had a different start line.

 That's all I'm trying to say, is that start line influences what shot shape people think they 

Agreed!

 

Start line is very important as you’re alluding to. I think that’s one of the things the pros do so well- they control the start line of their ball very very often. That’s one reason they’re so good out of the trees lol. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So I played tonight and my misses were pull hooks and pushes with driver. The guy I was playing with said I was standing up at impact???


Note: This thread is 2818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.