Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2819 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know I'm a slight arc stroke putter.  I use a Newport Tei3.  I also have the same putter in Longneck and putt the same with both.  The thing is, the long neck is face balanced for straight back straight through strokes while the other has slight toe hang for slight arc.

Today at Golf Galaxy i grabbed both the Ping Tyne face balanced and the new plumbers neck slight arc version.  I putted better with the face balanced.  I grabbed the Odyessey #7 which is face balanced and made everything.  Taylormade Spider tour which is slight arc...made everything.

So, is there more of a blurred line if u are slight arc where a face balanced putter will work.  Only way a face balanced putter would not work is if you were a big arc.  And if u were straight back straight through would a slight arc putter be fine but not a big arc like a heel shafted mallet?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

It doesn't really matter.

As in the Directed Force topic, the forces here are negligible.

Putters should, in order of importance, help you:

  • Aim properly. This is a function of the lines, the hosel, the head shape, the loft… shaft length, basically how everything looks.
  • Control distance properly. This is a function of weight and where it's located (head weight, shaft weight, counter-weight…).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For me, I think distance control is far more important on longer putts. I've seen a ton of guys who could read the line, but not the distance. They would rap it looking good, but wind up a mile short or blast it a mile long! I'm in that crew!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  On 10/29/2017 at 11:59 PM, Buckeyebowman said:

For me, I think distance control is far more important on longer putts. I've seen a ton of guys who could read the line, but not the distance. They would rap it looking good, but wind up a mile short or blast it a mile long! I'm in that crew!

Expand  

That's got almost nothing to do with this topic.

Please read the topic - not just the last post or two - before responding. The topic is about whether different putter styles better fit different putting stroke styles.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Both my golfing buddy and I have straight back and through putting styles. I had a toe hang putter, and struggled with short putts. I switched to a face balanced putter and my short (<6') putting improved dramatically. I probably shaved 2-3 strokes off my putting per 18. My golfing buddy also was using a toe hang putter, and he too switched to face balanced. I don;t think he saw quite the improvement I did, but he definitely improved. 

I'd say there is definitely good reason to get a putter that matches your stroke.

EDIT:

This got me thinking, so I checked my stats. I began using the new putter on 6/13 of this year. 

From 3/1-6/12

1.85 putts per hole, 2.13 putts per GIR

From 6/13-pres

1.79 putts per hole, 2.03 putts per GIR

Not as big of a difference as I thought. That said, I played my home course almost exclusively in the beginning of the year, and other, much harder courses more recently. I still feel the switch made a significant improvement.

 

Edited by hilmar2k
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
  On 11/1/2017 at 3:11 PM, hilmar2k said:

Both my golfing buddy and I have straight back and through putting styles.

Expand  

I'd wager that you don't. Not on putts outside of about 6-10". Not unless your shoulders are basically horizontal when you putt. (Maybe they are? And I'm not saying I'm right… just that I'd likely win the wager more often than I'd lose it. :-D)

  On 11/1/2017 at 3:11 PM, hilmar2k said:

I had a toe hang putter, and struggled with short putts. I switched to a face balanced putter and my short (<6') putting improved dramatically.

Expand  

It may have not been the "toe hang" or "face balanced." It may have simply been that you couldn't align one putter, and you align the other one much better.

As I've said in the Directed Force topic, the forces are negligible. If you can aim a putter, the weight can be pretty much anywhere (within reason, i.e. anything resembling a "normal putter") and you can make the same stroke and get the same results.

The heel/toe weighting thing is overblown in importance. Alignment - the ability to aim the putter where you think - is 

  On 11/1/2017 at 3:11 PM, hilmar2k said:

From 3/1-6/12

1.85 putts per hole, 2.13 putts per GIR

From 6/13-pres

1.79 putts per hole, 2.03 putts per GIR

Not as big of a difference as I thought. That said, I played my home course almost exclusively in the beginning of the year, and other, much harder courses more recently. I still feel the switch made a significant improvement.

Expand  

I don't know your game, of course, and I'm not saying this next bit applies at all, but obviously someone could see those changes to their stats while they actually putt worse in the second half. How? By hitting the ball closer to the hole.

Putts per hole and putts per GIR aren't great stats. A guy who averages 1.8 from 10' is likely a much worse putter than a guy who averages 1.9 from 50'.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Iacas said it right ...if the weight isn't extreme, it's negligible. Same stroke and set up...same results.

I think I said it earlier, a putter with a lot of toe hang, I'm no good with.  It's too much.  The difference between the slight arc putters like my Newport and a face balanced putter like my Futura are so slight I can putt the same with either one.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As well as putting stroke I think that when you look down over the ball a center shafted putter is more suited or at least that's what I found after several putters later and advice from a pro having looked at my putting... now using a Nike Method Mod90 and I'd never switch back.

  On 11/1/2017 at 4:50 PM, iacas said:

The heel/toe weighting thing is overblown in importance. Alignment - the ability to aim the putter where you think - is 

Expand  

 

Jones Carry Bag *** Titleist 975D 10.5  *** Wilson Staff FG Tour  4 - pw *** Callaway Mac Daddy 52 deg & 58 deg *** Nike Method Mod 90

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
  On 11/1/2017 at 4:50 PM, iacas said:

I'd wager that you don't. Not on putts outside of about 6-10". Not unless your shoulders are basically horizontal when you putt. (Maybe they are? And I'm not saying I'm right… just that I'd likely win the wager more often than I'd lose it. :-D)

It may have not been the "toe hang" or "face balanced." It may have simply been that you couldn't align one putter, and you align the other one much better.

As I've said in the Directed Force topic, the forces are negligible. If you can aim a putter, the weight can be pretty much anywhere (within reason, i.e. anything resembling a "normal putter") and you can make the same stroke and get the same results.

The heel/toe weighting thing is overblown in importance. Alignment - the ability to aim the putter where you think - is 

I don't know your game, of course, and I'm not saying this next bit applies at all, but obviously someone could see those changes to their stats while they actually putt worse in the second half. How? By hitting the ball closer to the hole.

Putts per hole and putts per GIR aren't great stats. A guy who averages 1.8 from 10' is likely a much worse putter than a guy who averages 1.9 from 50'.

Expand  

What I will say is that my 3 putts have almost vanished, and that is almost entirely due to my short putting improving dramatically with the newer putter. Also, I don't think it was (is) and alignment issue. With my old putter, I fought to keep it on the path of my stroke. The new putter fights me to stay on the intended path. It's amazing. It's much harder for me to make a truly bad putting stroke. I still miss putts, but much more of that is due to a misread than a bad putt.

I will add, that half the improvement is due to a better stroke made with the new putter, and the other half is the confidence that inspires. I stand over 3-4' putts and just know they're going in.

Edited by hilmar2k
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 11/1/2017 at 10:13 PM, PaddyMac said:

As well as putting stroke I think that when you look down over the ball a center shafted putter is more suited or at least that's what I found after several putters later and advice from a pro having looked at my putting... now using a Nike Method Mod90 and I'd never switch back.

Expand  

Thats me to --  I am on top of the ball.  The look of a center shaft fits to a tee

  • Thumbs Up 1

Note: This thread is 2819 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Sounds about right. I forgot this place existed until now.
    • Day 5: Mirror work focusing on the start of the backswing
    • Day 82 (22 Jul 25) - played our church men’s group captains choice nine hole this evening.  Had a blast working green side shots with the wedges.  Love the format as I play a nine club bag which brings on shot creativity in a fun way. 
    • Finished Bandon Trail today. Man what a course. Big upgrade over Sheep Ranch. I am giving Sheep Ranch a  7/10. Mostly views, course was good, and fun.  I am giving Bandon Trails 8.25/10. It's up there with Sand Valley in my opinion. Much more demanding of the course. With the wind it just gets brutal.  The first two holes are fully exposed to the wind, since they sit on the western edge of the course, open to the pacific. Even though it is tree lined, the wind has a big impact as it rolls over the hills and dunes. You can be surrounded by trees and feel the 20 mph wind at the tee box or fairway. I recommend using the yardage book, as it contains the course layout with a compass rose showing the prevailing wind (almost always from the north in the summer). It's easier to judge which direction the wind is going.  I played halfway decent. I hate when the shank gets loaded into the gun. Short game is on point, putting is good. I just need to make better swigs. My shot is definitely not built for wind. 😭 Here are some photos...    
    • Would he not be entitled to unplayable relief and a one stroke penalty? And wouldn't the drop for unplayable plausibly be the same as the one he took?  That he cited the wrong rule and no penalty makes this a two stroke penalty instead of one? I'm assuming I'm wrong and there is a rule that prevents the player from reinterpreting his actions afterwards?  Regarding rule 14.7 - wrong place - and the general penalty. In this case, he gained a significant advantage by having an unimpeded swing? Shouldn't the penalty be for a "serious breach"? DQ?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...