Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

"A True Swing" by Erika Larkin


Note: This thread is 1346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Discuss "A True Swing" by Erika Larkin here.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just read the first several pages from Amazon, so it's hard for me to know exactly what the book has the student working on.

She claims to have "dissected Jones' teachings and put my own twist on them considering everything else I have learned in the modern era, applying today's technology and a 21st century understanding of physics."

Most instructors I've encountered believe through their methods, there is an ease with which improvement will come, along with a certainty that their method is different and better than the rest. (Only one I know of constantly reminds potential students that "golf is hard".) 

Look at the YouTube instruction out there. Many of the videos end with something like "if you use this drill (or thought), I guarantee you'll start seeing those scores drop". Really, you guarantee it?

The trouble I have with "swing the clubhead", and "a true swing cannot fail to produce perfect timing", and at the same time "automatically produce a great hit... if you let it", is that we must first develop the necessary mechanics. In addition, we can't simply learn a decent swing, we have to become "unconsciously competent" with it.

For me, that's uncharted territory, so this is just a guess... Perhaps only after the good mechanics have been accomplished and embedded, can a simple thought such as "swing the clubhead" mean anything beyond taking a crappy swing that we simply do not think about.

Going by the sample of the first few pages, the book seems to be well-written. If the author's methods of instruction are sound - meaning she can phrase things in such a way or present drills that will help improve my mechanics - this might be a decent book. But if it's similar to so much of the instruction I see, my "true swing" will continue to be what it currently is. 

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
43 minutes ago, birdie seeker said:

To get a better idea of her style, if you will, she has videos on YouTube. View them, let me know what you think.

I watched about a half dozen of them. Honestly, hers are similar to a lot of instructors who post drills and thoughts. That's not to say they are without value. She is very easy listen to.

When I first tried to learn this game, I put a lot of effort into working on some of these drills but I haven't done much of that in the last few years. Perhaps I should give them a try again.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I bought a copy and will share my thoughts when I've read it.

I know Erika a little. She's smart. So that's a good start…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, birdie seeker said:

To get a better idea of her style, if you will, she has videos on YouTube. View them, let me know what you think.

I watch her You Tube videos quite often. Especially the short game stuff. She seems to use both older, and newer information quite well together. 

My favorite one is her ideas on using a wedge with bounce from a tight lie. She explains that shot quite well. 

Another thing I like about her videos is that she is easy to listen to. Her video sound tracks are loud, and clear enough for my older, suspect ears to hear her quite well. 

 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was just watching another one of her videos and thought about something she does. 

I read all the time about golfers who say their practice swing is their best swing. The swing we make where our tempo, and timing is pretty much right where we want it. The swing where everything feels just right. The swing we make when there is no ball in the way to hit. 

I might be wrong, but I am of the opinion that these great practice swings we all make, is pretty similar to what she is teaching. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 months later...
  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, birdie seeker said:

iacas, Have you had a chance to read Erica's book?

No. It's not that long, so I will at some point.

I've heard in a few places that it's kinda an Ernest Jones thing, and I tend not to be a fan of those, because… some people can't just "swing the clubhead" or whatever variant of that there is.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I have been working on club focused instruction for a few years now.  The basic premise of club focused instruction says that your body is smart enough to make the club move the way you want it to, once you know what that is.

I love the concept of thinking about just swinging the club, and your body will respond to the movement.  I largely believe in that, but not completely.  After years of trying, that still wasn’t quite getting it.  In my experience, my transition needed help.  Things really need to work from the ground up, just as they do when we throw a ball or swing a racket.

That’s where Erika’s teaching philosophy comes in.  She too is a massive proponent of Ernest Jones (and others) ideas.  But while our brain is really well adapted to producing the motions we want, apparently the golf motion still needs a little guidance.  Erica takes the basic ideas of a swing as Ernest Jones describes (I highly recommend his “Swing The Clubhead”) and plugs in modern instruction and science to help better understand how we can create our own swing reality.  Her drills are mostly motion type drills, and are easy to implement. If you buy her book, please do the drills, video yourself or get a video golf lesson with a pro before criticizing the book.  I have had lessons with world renowned instructors (body as well as club focused) and read many golf instruction books and this was the first material I have read where I didn’t question anything I was reading.  Her instruction is not a method.  Her ideas apply to everyone.  I think she nailed it!  Oh, I have that transition business figured out now.

Marcus

 

 

 

  • Like 1

  • 3 years later...
Posted

I read Erika Larkin’s book, A True Swing’. I’ve applied her principles which are not new based on her book. Basically using your body to dominate your swing instead of manipulating your swing path with your arms & hands.  I was able to use an indoor facility with a face & back view camera. I immediately noticed my swing path was perfect and didn’t feel any effort in performing the golf swing. I had great ball contact which reflected longer distances (15-20 yards) with every club along with a nice draw. Hope this helps. 


Note: This thread is 1346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.