Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6528 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yes, it will take off

What's in my orange Callaway Warbird Hot:

Maltby CT250 11.5° - SK Fiber Pure Energy s-flex
Maltby CT250 18° - SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 s-flex
Taylor Made RAC OS2 3-PW - True Temper r-flexTitleist Vokey Satin 252.08 (bent to 49°) & Satin SM54.10Yes! Tiffany (center shafted)Top Flite D2 Feel...


  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The plane DOES take off.
In the bag:


Driver: Tour Burner 9.5* w/ Aldila VS Proto stiff shaft
Woods: Burner 15* 3 Wood w/ Fujikura, stiffHybrid: 503H w/ Aldila NV, stiffIrons: 755 3-9 w/ Project X 5.5 shaftsPitching Wedge: MP-T 47*Gap Wedge: MP-T 51*Sand Wedge: MP-T 56*Putter: Rossa SienaBall: Laddie/Laddie...

Posted
no. If it could take off we don't need miles of runways for taking off, all planes could take off that way?

R7 9.5 S Shaft
560 R7 quad R shaft
RAC LT irons
Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum


Posted
Nope...last time I checked, planes weren't dependent on wheels to takeoff.

Driver: R5 Dual 9.5
Hybrids: 08 Rescue Tour 20 & 23
Irons: 735C.M 3-PW
Putter: White Hot 2-Ball
Da Ball: Pro V1


  • Administrator
Posted
Here is the Answer: The plane flies.

To an observer standing on the ground, the takeoff appears perfectly normal except that the wheels will be spinning twice as fast.

A plane with locked brakes could take off from a sheet of pure ice, too.

The reason? Unlike a car, planes don't push against the ground - they pull themselves through the air. Since the air isn't moving (only the conveyor belt is), the plane pulls itself through the air, reaches takeoff speed, and takes off.

In my experience, those who said "no" either:
a) forgot that planes don't push against the ground like cars do
b) misread the question and/or assume things that don't make sense at all or which aren't in the question, like "the plane is stationary."

The plane isn't stationary, and in fact the very question says the plane moves (or else the conveyor belt would just sit there and not move either).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That makes no sense. Planes make lift by air moving over the wings. Whether the wind is blowing, or the engines pushing the plane forward, air is moving over the wings to provide lift.

If you are stationary on a conveyor belt, there is absolutely no wind moving over the wings, and hence no lift. You're going to spin the wheels a lot, but unless you've got vectored thrust or a rocket engine you're not going anywhere.

In effect, the plane is running on a giant treadmill.

Edit: Now I get it - the wheels aren't connected in the same way a car is, a la gears and such.
"Shouldn't you be going faster? I mean, you're doing 40 in a 65..."

Driver: Burner TP 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 15*
2I: Eye 23I-PW: 3100 I/HWedges: Vokey Spin-Milled 56*06, MP-R 52*07/60*05Putter: Victoria IIBall: Pro V1xCheck out my new blog: Thousand Yard DriveHome Course: Kenton County...

  • Administrator
Posted
Edit: Now I get it - the wheels aren't connected in the same way a car is, a la gears and such.

Right, they're free-spinning wheels. So do you see now why all of what you wrote at first is wrong?

As I said, the plane moves forward and takes off normally. It isn't stationary relative to anything - not an observer on the ground and obviously not the conveyor belt, nor the air.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
In my experience, those who said "no" either:

Guilty! Except for the "forgot" portion, since I'm not sure I knew it in the first place. In any case, good brainteaser.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
For those of you who said "No", don't feel too bad. I'm a pilot and frequent a professional pilot forum where this same question was asked last year. A lot of pilots, many of them airline pilots, also answered "No".
In my bag:

Driver: FT-5, 9° stiff
Wood: Big Bertha 3W/5W
Irons: X-20 TourWedges: X Tour 52°/56°Hybrids: Idea Pro 2/3/4Putter: Black Series #2Ball: NXT Extreme/NXT Tour
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
OK, I have been waiting a while to do this, if this is based on mythbusters I do not believe that it is true, because for a plane to take off the airflow under the wing has to be slower than that of the air going above the wing, hence the curve on top of the wing that is more significant than the air flow under the wing. When a plane is standing still how is air moving under the wing? This gets me to the mythbusters question: When you watch the mythbusters the plane is NOT standing still on the conveyor belt, the plane is still moving forward even though not as fast as normal. So until the plane is actually standing still on the conveyor belt, as in i mean wheels are moving, but plane isn't, then I will believe it, but for now I still say no.
What's In The Bag?

Driver - Rapture 10.5 Epic 68g X-Pure - Balance Certified
Fairway Metal - Titleist PT 18°
Irons - Mizuno MP-67 3-PW Project X 6.0 Wedges - Mizunos R Series Chrome 52°, 56°, 58° Project X 6.0 Putter - Yes! C-Groove Callie-f - Balance Certified Bag - Ping Freestyle...

Posted
When a plane is standing still how is air moving under the wing?

That's the problem in your thinking. The plane

IS moving. Reread this part of the question: A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of large conveyer belt). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. Many people get this question wrong because they assume that the plane does not move due to the conveyer belt. The plane is definitely moving. Think of it this way, for the conveyer belt to move, the plane must move. Remember, the conveyer belt moves as fast as the aircraft in the opposite direction. If the plane were to remain stationary then the conveyer belt would not be moving. The only difference between a takeoff on a runway and a takeoff on a conveyer belt is the speed of the tires spinning.
In my bag:

Driver: FT-5, 9° stiff
Wood: Big Bertha 3W/5W
Irons: X-20 TourWedges: X Tour 52°/56°Hybrids: Idea Pro 2/3/4Putter: Black Series #2Ball: NXT Extreme/NXT Tour
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If the plane is standing still while moving on the conveyor belt, meaning it is stationary, how is the wind going under the wing....the conveyor belt is moving, the wheels are moving on the plane, but the air is not moving and the plane is not being pushed through the air, I just don't agree with what mythbusters did b/c the plane actually moved forward if you watched the background. I would have to talk to someone who is a genius at physics and aeronautics because I still don't think it's possible.
What's In The Bag?

Driver - Rapture 10.5 Epic 68g X-Pure - Balance Certified
Fairway Metal - Titleist PT 18°
Irons - Mizuno MP-67 3-PW Project X 6.0 Wedges - Mizunos R Series Chrome 52°, 56°, 58° Project X 6.0 Putter - Yes! C-Groove Callie-f - Balance Certified Bag - Ping Freestyle...

Posted
k, now I understand, thank you for the logical explanation vancortlandtgc
What's In The Bag?

Driver - Rapture 10.5 Epic 68g X-Pure - Balance Certified
Fairway Metal - Titleist PT 18°
Irons - Mizuno MP-67 3-PW Project X 6.0 Wedges - Mizunos R Series Chrome 52°, 56°, 58° Project X 6.0 Putter - Yes! C-Groove Callie-f - Balance Certified Bag - Ping Freestyle...

  • Administrator
Posted

I see you've had your question answered in the time it took me to write my response, so I'll leave my post up in case anyone else falls into the same trap as you.

If the plane is standing still while moving on the conveyor belt, meaning it is stationary,

How can something be "standing still while moving"?

As the question says, the plane is standing on the conveyor belt... then starts moving. Most planes are sitting there prior to takeoff - this one's no different. Other ways of saying it would be that "you set a plane on a conveyor belt" or "a plane moves onto a conveyor belt, stops, and then tries to take off as planes do." As I said above, the plane takes off 100% normally... except the wheels are spinning twice as fast as normal.
the conveyor belt is moving

Right

the wheels are moving on the plane

Right

but the air is not moving

Right

and the plane is not being pushed through the air

Wrong. The plane is moving through the air (and relative to the ground, and also relative to the conveyor belt).

I just don't agree with what mythbusters did b/c the plane actually moved forward if you watched the background.

You need to read what I said above. You have fallen prey to one of the two flaws most people seem to succumb to. The conveyor belt can do nothing to stop the plane's prop (or jet engines) from pulling the plane forward through the air.

Nowhere is it stated that the plane REMAINS stationary. In fact, the very question says the plane moves - and that the conveyor matches its speed. Objects just sitting there have no speed.
I would have to talk to someone who is a genius at physics and aeronautics because I still don't think it's possible.

I assure you it doesn't take a genius to figure this one out.

Here's another way I've seen it explained: the conveyor belt's only real force is applied upwards. It holds up the plane. A teeny, teeny, teeny bit of friction (force) in the wheels themselves resist their turning, but the source is the wheel's bearings, which are pretty close (99.99%) to frictionless. This force is negligible and obviously exists on normal takeoffs too. The weight of the plane pushes down, canceling the force of the conveyor belt (or ground normally) pushing up. The engine of the plane applies a force that moves the plane forward. This force is thousands (or more) times greater than the force of friction in the wheels. Where there are misbalanced forces, you see acceleration. Nothing abnormal here. The plane takes off normally. You're putting "stationary" into the question when it isn't there except to state where the plane is positioned. You have to say the plane is "sitting" on the conveyor belt because the only other options are that it's "hovering above," "beside," etc. The very question goes on to state that the plane then moves, as does the conveyor belt.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
A plane only takes off because of the air over the top of the wings takes longer than the air underneath the wings. This causes lift. As the plane will not be moving this lift will not occur - the plane will never take off.

  • Administrator
Posted
A plane only takes off because of the air over the top of the wings takes longer than the air underneath the wings. This causes lift. As the plane will not be moving this lift will not occur - the plane will never take off.

Please see the above. You're wrong about the plane not moving and thus about the plane not taking off.

The answer's already been given.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No!

Why would the plane take off?

In order for a plane to take off there must be lift from the flow of air past the wings. The plane isn't going any where, so there is no lift! No lift.... no takeoff!

(Must be Northwest Airlines!)

Note: This thread is 6528 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.