Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6486 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Should range finders be made legal? Explain your choice below.

    • Yes
      30
    • No
      10
    • I remain undecided
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted
I am in total favor of them being allowed.

Up here in North Podunk, we are fortunate to have a 150 yard marker in the middle of the fairway, sometimes a 100 marker, and it really slows down play when everything has to be walked off to those distances.

It would speed up already slow rounds and increase enjoyment on those courses that you may only play a few times and not know where to search for the sprinkler heads.

WITB
Driver: Ping G425 - Aldila Rogue White
3 Wood: Nike SQ Dymo 
Hybrid: TaylorMade SLDR
Irons: Ping i525 Retro Spec
Wedges: Cleveland 588 (52,56,60)
Putter: Never Compromise Gamble Limited Custom

Balls: Titleist ProV1


Posted
Definitely should be legal. Yes, I can use sprinkler heads in the fairway. But what about :

- Inside 100 yards. All the courses I play on have no markers inside 100 yards but this is where a precise yardage is most important. If I don't have my GPS and I start pacing off yardages to the green, it's going to take forever.

- Outside of the fairway. There aren't markers in the rough and approaching from a different angle makes it harder to get a correct yardage. This is especially true on dog legs. I'm sure all of us have played a hole from the wrong fairway a few times and knowing yardages when you're out of position is a huge advantage when trying to salvage a hole.

- Other yardages besides the green. Knowing precise layup yardages when there are hazards in front of the green, distances to bunkers of the tee, etc are very important to playing an intelligent round. Some courses have decent yardage books but most move the tees around enough (and don't mark the measuring points well) that I find they aren't very accurate. Many courses these days don't even sell yardage books (some because they want you to pay $$ for a GPS cart).

Big clubs: :titleist: 915D3 @ 9.5°, :callaway: X-Hot Pro 3W
Med clubs: :callaway: X-Hot Pro 5W, :titleist: 910H 4H,
Small clubs: :callaway: X-Hot Pro 5-AW, :titleist: Vokey 55.10, 60.10


Posted
I voted no. I like the challenge of trying to figure out what shot to play and how far i need to carry. When Erik said something about being off center in a fairway 10 yards ahead of a sprinkler I think thats golf. I like the part of the game that makes me think about what I am doing and how to play each shot. I feel like I play better when I have to think about a shot more, maybe my focus transitions into my swing, maybe not. I just think golf is a difficult game and with all the improvements in technology its taking certain aspects out of the game.

In the bag:

Burner 10.5
Rescue mid 16, 19, 22, 25
X-16 irons Forged+ Vintage 48, 54, 60 Circa 62 #3 A009125


Posted
Not sure what the debate is about... I'm almost certain that they are, and have been, legal for both handicapping and tournament play for over two years now. Am I missing something?

If yardage books and caddies who know a course as well as if they were a human gps are legal, it makes no sense to me why an electronic device that does the same thing shouldn't be as well.

Just got my igolf neo and it has shaved 8 strokes off my game already!!!

Just kidding, I still suck...

What's in my bag:
Cleveland Hibore XLS Monster Driver
TourEdge Exotics 2,3,4 hybrid irons
Tommy Armour 845cs Silverbacks 5-PW
Assorted wedges, Ping Scottsdale Anser


Posted
Not sure what the debate is about... I'm almost certain that they are, and have been, legal for both handicapping and tournament play for over two years now. Am I missing something?

The thread was started August 1st, 2005, back when they had yet to have specific legal status. It - the thread - just seems to get popped back to the surface every now and then.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6486 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.