Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Danfix99

19 deg or 22 deg hybrid to replace my 20 deg 3-iron?

13 posts in this topic

Hello everyone,

I decided on Taylormade Burner hybrid, but I am not sure which loft to get, 19 or 22 deg. I currently play a 18 deg 5-wood, which I really like from the tee and fairway, but not from the rough. I have heard that distance-wise, a 4-hybrid typically replaces a 3-iron. My 3-iron is 20 deg, 4-iron is 23 deg, and I don't hit either one very well. I am getting a hybrid mostly for shots out of the rough. Opinions? Thanks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

JMHO...I think the 22 would be exactly the club you are looking for, as it would fit all the criteria listed above. I wouldn't worry about a gap between it and the 5 wood unless it is over 20-25 yards.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

go with the 22* hybrid. it will effectively replace a 3iron and maybe even your 4iron as well. there wont be much of a gap between that and the 5wood. if you replace the 3 and 4irons with the hybrid you can also look into adding another wedge or something to help out with your short game. that's just my take.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use my 19* hybrid to replace my 5w and fill the gap between my 4i (not sure of it's loft) and my 3w. I don't hit the hybrid as far as I hit the 5w but there really wasn't much of a distinction between my 3W and 5w, so it made sense for me to drop the 5w and pick up a LW.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 23 degree 4H Nickent 4DX that I'm looking to unload if you're intersted. In overall good shape with the stock stiff SR3 shaft.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i would go with the 19 degree because with a hybrid you get a higher ball flight. Which would mean it could could come up shortof the green from 3 iron range
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a 16 and 19 hybrid last year. I have found there to be a gap between my 21 degree 3 iron and the 19 hybrid. The 19 degree was described as a 3 iron replacement, but it goes further with a more piercing flight. I am thinking of adding a 22 degree G5 to take the place of my 3 iron even though I like the 3 iron for low shots out of trouble. Good luck in finding the club that works best with your set! I would imagine it to be the 22 degree.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 20* heavenwood and it goes farther than my 3 iron... but thats probably because I can hit better with the hybrid...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about you guys but I have a "3 hybrid" that I hit about 10-15 yards farther than my 3 iron
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've experimented with hybrids but have no real need for them.

I've only got, practically speaking, two fairway shots left in my bag after my 180 yard carry 5-iron shot

--a long fairway metal good for about 210 or so yards of carry

and either a high lofted metal or a hybrid to fill the gap between the long fairway metal and the 5-iron.

If I didn't already have all the short clubs that I'd need, I'd go with a hybrid and let it double as my scary-driving-hole driving iron.

Since I don't need another short club, I can go with the hi-loft metal, my preference, and the real driving iron both.

Overall, however, I find that if three types of clubs have the same loft, the fairway metal carries longest, the iron shortest, and the hybrid somewhere in the middle. Thus for me, a 20º iron is equivalent to a 22º hybrid or a 24º metal--roughly and thereabouts.

That's me. You'd have to try it for yourself.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Scientific Studies
      Oh, good Lord! I can't believe that you entered such a completely off the mark reply! I thought you had some smarts. Valuable eyeballs? There are no such things! There are only eyeballs. Advertising rates are established on "number of impressions", in other words the number of people who see your ad. The only "value" established for those "eyeballs" is what age they are, what demographic they belong to. If you're seeking to market to a particular demographic, you might pay more to place an ad on "this" show rather than "that" show. And who said anything about "left and right"? You did! You used the phrase "industry supported research", which is a code phrase of the left to indicate research that is suspect! When have you ever heard "Entertainment Industry supported research", or "Actor supported research" in reply! And please don't try to tell me that government sponsored research is as pure as the wind driven snow. I've just realized that you may be confining your remarks to the field of physics. In that realm, they might be valid. Besides you, me, and a couple of guys behind the tree, who the hell cares? I'm referring more to "agendized" science, like climatology, nutrition, and prescription drugs. As for blind funding, that doesn't mean throwing money at any bunch of yahoos who cook up some hare brained scheme. All it means is that the people who are doing the research don't know where the money is.coming from. So they don't know who is buttering their bread! Let's face it, scientists are people, and they need to make a living. There was a line from "The Big Bang Theory" that, while fictional, makes real world sense. In one episode another physicist, Barry Kripke, is asked why he's still studying string theory. He says, "Hey, I study a theory that can't be proven, I apply for grants, and I spend the money on booze and broads!"
    • "Swing Machine Golf" by Paul Wilson
      I will apologize in advance if this post winds up being long. I went out for my first round of golf in 2015, shot a 110, went home, put my clubs on Craigslist, sold them within a day and decided to quit the game. I had been playing for 25 years but only felt I was getting worse. Then, while planning a summer trip to Las Vegas I stumbled upon Paul Wilson's golf videos. I watched a few and couldn't believe how simple he made the golf swing look. I picked up an extra driver from my garage, started trying to swing free and easy and went to the range 2-3 times a week to see if this method would really work. My first time out I shot 97. The second was a 92. The next was an 85. Then, I booked a pair of lessons with Wilson during my vacation. Long story short, Paul Wilson's teaching methods kept me from quitting the game. My handicap is down to an 11, and I am scheduled for two more lessons with him in July so I can confirm somebody who reads this forum is a Wilson disciple. While he can get pretty technical when describing his approach for me it's pretty simple - turn to the top, start the downswing with the lower body and let my arms swing loosely. I expect to break 80 for the first time in my life by the end of the year.               One more thing, which has been noted previously in this thread - if I get off track I immediately go to YouTube, que up a couple of Paul's videos and know exactly what I'm doing wrong. His web site is an incredible resource for me, and I assume it's the same for many others.
    • Muirfield Out of Open Rota, Denies Women Membership
      I was under the impression that Cypress Point had been removed from the "Crosby Clambake" simply because the membership at that course didn't like the idea of the general public trampling on their hallowed turf.  Part of that reasoning might be based simply upon the notion of exclusivity and status; on the other hand, the environment around the course is somewhat fragile and having thousands of golf fans moving around that delicate seaside plant life and sand dunes would not be good for it. You can't tell me that most of the pros who play in the AT&T ProAm don't try and pull whatever strings they have at their disposal to play a round at Cypress during the weekend or weekdays before the AT&T event given the spectacular design and the chance to play a relatively well-preserved MacKenzie design. So even now that Cypress Point has female members I don't believe we can expect that we will ever see it on the AT&T course rota again.
    • Carry-on one Driver golf club in airplane? US and to Eurpoe?
      Thanks, Iacas. I will carry on one Driver with me without  any packaging.  I will have to pass through security check and X-ray scanning. By the way, my flight will be from Toronto Pearson airport to EU, so I hope Canada will have the same regulation as US since they are part of NA (North America). I will let you know if I will get into any trouble.  (I will not do practice swing inside the plane, but I may try while I wait around boarding area. ) Thanks!      
    • 2016 Mets World Championship Thread
      This kind of makes me laugh. I heard the Cleveland Indians GM interviewed on radio before a series with KC. Turns out he's a big friend of the Royals GM. He said the Royals Gm told him that his players were joking with him about how full of themselves the NY media was. They would ask the Royals players "Have you ever seen a pitching staff like the Mets?" The Royals players would answer, "Yes! Every time we play the Indians, Tigers, White Sox, or Twins! We're used to seeing good pitching!"
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries