• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dereckbc

PING EYE 2 IRONS

25 posts in this topic

First let me say I own two full sets of PING EYE 2 irons and one is the Beryllium Copper I use today. Best irons ever made even today. But today I was at a driving range which I occasionally go to in Calera OK just north of the Red River. The man who owns and runs the pace is an official Ping Dealer. His wife was in the shop today instead of him, but while in there I got the SHOCK of my life. Right next to the counter was a rack with 3 Brand Spanking New PING EYE 2 Sand Wedges. A Black, White, and Green dot. I pulled one to look because I could not believe my eyes. They look legit with PING Sticker matching with the serial number and PING grips. I quizzed his wife about it and she said he just got them in from PING. Now for the real Shocker; she said he can now get full sets of BRAND NEW PING EYE 2 irons. She said no Beryllium Copper, but standard steel. Can this be true? Is PING re-releasing the line? The one I looked at has the classic square grooves. I know folks who would pay a $1000 for a set of 3-SW of original Ping Eye 2. Heck with that I know people who would pay several thousand for a brand new set of originals.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

A golf shop clubfitter told me that Ping has the molds for most of its past iron models, and will make you a set of a vintage model for a premium price.

I would contact Ping and ask for details.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ping recently rereleased the old Eye 2 wedges with the newer groove style. I looked at them when I was purchasing new wedges, but settled on the Tour S Rustique ones I currently own. I can't vouch for the fact that they are willing to make entire iron sets, but I know the wedges were on the market a year or two ago.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ping recently rereleased the old Eye 2 wedges with the newer groove style

That is possible. I did look closely at the club face. I did not have one of my originals to look side by side, but it sure looked like the same spacing, depth, and square groves. Now with that said I have sent on eof my original sets in to be re shafted and when the came back it was obvious they regroved/refaced the clubface ss they looked brand new and spun the ball like a brand new set. Is it possible they are re-releasing the Eye 2 with new conforming groves? Not sure how well that would go over since it was the groves that made the things so deadly and easy to hit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I contacted PING about buying older clubs and they told me if it's on their site listed as "available" it can be ordered from a PING retailer. They told me I could order new G2's and that's an older model. I talked to a guy at Golfsmith and he confirmed it could be ordered. I was surprised considering it was about the same as what I'd seen on-line for a used club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I contacted PING about buying older clubs and they told me if it's on their site listed as "available" it can be ordered from a PING retailer.

Interesting I looked at PING's website and all the Eye 2's are on there. It is the AVAIALBLE part I cannot determine. The G2 along with the EYE 2 are in the Classic Line up. If they can still be ordered I would do it in a heartbeat.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by dereckbc

Is it possible they are re-releasing the Eye 2 with new conforming groves? Not sure how well that would go over since it was the groves that made the things so deadly and easy to hit.

That's part of what disappointed me when I tried them. I bought my Eye 2's lightly used, but the spin was still pretty nice on the sand wedge I got. I'm still hanging on to the irons with my non-conforming grooves for a while longer, at least until I buy a new set of irons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought my Eye 2's lightly used, but the spin was still pretty nice on the sand wedge I got. I'm still hanging on to the irons with my non-conforming grooves for a while longer, at least until I buy a new set of irons.

Take this advice from experience, send your irons into PING to be restored. I sent mine in for shafts and grips. They came back with with factory spec lie angle and club face. I promise they will be just like new again, even with new paint. Other than the deep scratches on the sole and leading edge, they will be like new again. If memory serves me correctly if a head is too far gone they will replace it with a new one. I know they still have the club heads for replacements, I just do not know if you can still order a set.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just came across a set on Craigslist for $275. Can't believe someone would be selling them for that cheap. They clearly don't know what they have.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by dereckbc

Interesting I looked at PING's website and all the Eye 2's are on there. It is the AVAIALBLE part I cannot determine. The G2 along with the EYE 2 are in the Classic Line up. If they can still be ordered I would do it in a heartbeat.

Shoot them an email. When I asked about the G2 I had an answer in a few hours.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Shoot them an email. When I asked about the G2 I had an answer in a few hours.

Just shot them an email. Let's see what happens.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just came across a set on Craigslist for $275. Can't believe someone would be selling them for that cheap. They clearly don't know what they have.

I can only assume they are in horrible shape or they are ignorant.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the beryllium ones the only ones worth a lot? I see a ton of non beryllium eye 2 sets on craigslist for about 100-300 bucks. Should i be snatching those up??
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the beryllium ones the only ones worth a lot?

Yes Sir they are. It was the last Ping Eye 2 model Ping made and to this day is the most popular club in terms of numbers sold. It was also the straw that broke the camels back when the PGA and USGA sued Karsten Golf. Case never went to court and was settled out of court. The whole thing really hacked off the golfing public and I never really understand how the USGA and PGA could file suit over a golf club. What is really sad it meant PING went from the #1 club manufacture to just in the middle of the pack. Anyway the Ping Eye 2 Beryllium Copper was and is the best irons ever made even to this day. The mass is greater than steel and because of that can transfer more energy into a golf ball. It is also very resilient and does not deform with repeated stress and impacts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by dereckbc

Yes Sir they are. It was the last Ping Eye 2 model Ping made and to this day is the most popular club in terms of numbers sold. It was also the straw that broke the camels back when the PGA and USGA sued Karsten Golf. Case never went to court and was settled out of court.

The whole thing really hacked off the golfing public and I never really understand how the USGA and PGA could file suit over a golf club. What is really sad it meant PING went from the #1 club manufacture to just in the middle of the pack.

Anyway the Ping Eye 2 Beryllium Copper was and is the best irons ever made even to this day. The mass is greater than steel and because of that can transfer more energy into a golf ball. It is also very resilient and does not deform with repeated stress and impacts.

The real reason that Copper Beryllium irons are worth more is the simple fact that they aren't made anymore. This is due to health hazards for the people working in the plant (so don't worry, hitting them isn't dangerous) and something to do with the fact that beryllium dust is not fun to inhale.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear dereckbc,
I found your posting during my Googling.
Let me introduce myself to you. I am Won-chul LEE and live in South Korea now.
I got a brand new set of original PING EYE 2 Beryllium Copper (not PLUS) iron set in South Korea now.
You wrote that you know people who would buy new PING EYE original iron set,
so I like to ask you to let me know the contact.
My Ping Eye 2 Beryllium Copper black dot is 9 iron set - 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,W,and S.
And it is not PLUS model.
It is perfect brand new which didn't eat dirt, nor hit any.
I removed the shrink seals from iron heads for picture taking.
Iron has got the Korean government's custom-paid stamps on several shafts.
Iron set has PINGMAN double diamond grips- PING and PING MAN in gold, while diamonds in white.
And it comes with ZZ-Lite shaft with matching serial number of 240845A.
Also I took off the plastic from the grip for the picture which I will put back on.
And one Ping grip has a stamp on it, which read - This is tarnished PING head ...
I hope this message would bring a good news to PING mania through you.
Thank you and regards,
Won-chul LEE
chully1@gmail.com
South KOREA
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by chully

Dear dereckbc,

I found your posting during my Googling.

Let me introduce myself to you. I am Won-chul LEE and live in South Korea now.

I got a brand new set of original PING EYE 2 Beryllium Copper (not PLUS) iron set in South Korea now.

You wrote that you know people who would buy new PING EYE original iron set,

so I like to ask you to let me know the contact.

My Ping Eye 2 Beryllium Copper black dot is 9 iron set - 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,W,and S.

And it is not PLUS model.

It is perfect brand new which didn't eat dirt, nor hit any.

I removed the shrink seals from iron heads for picture taking.

Iron has got the Korean government's custom-paid stamps on several shafts.

Iron set has PINGMAN double diamond grips-PING and PING MAN in gold, while diamonds in white.

And it comes with ZZ-Lite shaft with matching serial number of 240845A.

Also I took off the plastic from the grip for the picture which I will put back on.

And one Ping grip has a stamp on it, which read - This is tarnished PING head ...

I hope this message would bring a good news to PING mania through you.

Thank you and regards,

Won-chul LEE

chully1@gmail.com

South KOREA

...  Interesting

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by chully

Dear dereckbc,

I found your posting during my Googling.

Let me introduce myself to you. I am Won-chul LEE and live in South Korea now.

I got a brand new set of original PING EYE 2 Beryllium Copper (not PLUS) iron set in South Korea now.

You wrote that you know people who would buy new PING EYE original iron set,

so I like to ask you to let me know the contact.

My Ping Eye 2 Beryllium Copper black dot is 9 iron set - 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,W,and S.

And it is not PLUS model.

It is perfect brand new which didn't eat dirt, nor hit any.

I removed the shrink seals from iron heads for picture taking.

Iron has got the Korean government's custom-paid stamps on several shafts.

Iron set has PINGMAN double diamond grips-PING and PING MAN in gold, while diamonds in white.

And it comes with ZZ-Lite shaft with matching serial number of 240845A.

Also I took off the plastic from the grip for the picture which I will put back on.

And one Ping grip has a stamp on it, which read - This is tarnished PING head ...

I hope this message would bring a good news to PING mania through you.

Thank you and regards,

Won-chul LEE

chully1@gmail.com

South KOREA

So many questions/comments. Where to start...?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • Iron Game Suffers when Driver Going Well
      For high handicappers myself included, this is typical.   I think it is b/c we don't have the same swing for irons and longer clubs.  If we get them both right in the same round, it is probably by pure luck or coincidence.  Grin and bear, and enjoy the journey.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      The topic title is the question who is the greatest golfer, the poll is the question who was the best. Two different things in my opinion. There's no doubt to me Tiger was a better golfer. How could he not? Spieth, McIlroy, Day but even guys like Wiesberger, Luiten and Donaldson play better golf than Jack. The game evolved so much over the years, and got so much more professional. If Jack would have been around in this era he would benefit from all that as well and be a better golfer than he was (and probably top those guys I just mentioned). But who was the greatest. How do you measure that (can you)? Tiger was dominant in a stronger field, winning more titles than you can count. Jack was the first of a kind, winning the biggest titles (majors) over an enourmous span and having the most of them. Isn't it mostly a matter of personal who you find 'greater'? For me Johan Cruyff is the greatest Dutch football player of time, but I have no doubt that Dennis Bergkamp and Arjen Robben were/are better because the game evolved. 
    • Making a Murderer Discussion Thread (Spoilers Likely)
      Obvisously... she took his case about a month ago. On one hand I hope Avery is guilty as hell, on the other hand it would be an amazing story and twist if turns out to be set up and she can prove that. I think that chance is less than 1%, but still..... Possibly, good point. Should be quite some blood though since they found 'drops', meaning it was dripping from (in this theory) his glove. Exactly my point. I don't think the blood was freely flowing, because than there should be a lot more blood in the car. They found blood consisting with bloody hair. Seems to me, and I know I'm not an expert, that she was already dead when she was in the car, because that would explain the little amount of blood found (no pumping of the heart, no flow of blood) and the place it was found (in the back). One can easily argue that he killed in the garage, moved her to the car, and only then got the plan to burn her instead and moved her again; to the pit. But the 'problem' is that that's not what the DA said what happenend. In my opinion that blood in the car contradicts the story (or truth) he wants us and the jury to believe, and contradicts also with the story of Dassey which is the only thing that links Dassey to the case: his own words. That doesn't mean Avery is innocent, but it might raise some doubt. The DA should stick with the facts, not filling in the blanks with guessing. If he can't prove exact chronologically he shouldn't state it as 'fact'.   Absolutely. I'm not convinced in anything, not in my opinion, not in yours, not at all in the people who made the documentary. Also not a fan of conspiracy theory's. I don't think the murder was planted on him, but I do think some mistakes were made by the justice system. Mistakes that possibly should have lead to his and maybe even more Dassey's release, even though there's a big chance he did it. That's for me perhaps the most interesting part in this case and in the discussion. If we want a justice system where the chance is close to 0% that we convict someone innocent, and the prosecution and police need to follow the rules, it means sometimes the guilty walk free. I think everything they found on the compount while Manitowoc detectives were present should have been excluded. I think the DNA on the blood of the bullet should have been excluded. I think the 'confession' of Dassey should have been excluded. I think Dassey should have given at least a new trial, but that was denied by the same judge which handled his initial case (?!).
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      A long time ago, by Tiger's own admission,  said a golfer's career is measured by "majors won" . So if Woody does not break Jack's major record, then according to Woody, his career will be second to Jack's. Now Jack has said that he expects (expected) Woody to break his major record. So Jack is saying he expects Woody will have the better career.  These are the only two guys who would know who had the best career.   Neither one is going to be the GOAT. They will just be a GOTE. 
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Nope, you blindly worship Jack.  It is obvious that you have not read much, if any, of the thread.  But hey, you saw Jack.  In person, yet.  So what.  I did too.  I saw him win his last USGA championship at Cherry Hills.  I saw Tiger play as well - although in person I only saw practice rounds.  So what.  That does not make my assessment of their respective careers more or less credible.  Geee, I never saw Hogan play so I guess we cannot count him in the discussion.   You think Jack was better.  That is fine.  You are entitled to your opinion.  Just don't spoil it with specious reasons or arguments.  Because those we will slice apart like one of Klinger's salamis.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries