Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
RayG

My Swing (RayG)

14 posts in this topic

I've been Playing Golf for: 40yrs (about)

My current handicap index or average score is: 83/85

My typical ball flight is: HIGH

The shot I hate or the "miss" I'm trying to reduce/eliminate is: Lower the trajectory a bit AND lose those pull hooks and push slices


Video is 'decent' quality from an HD(720) camera on a smart phone (Blackberry 9810). It was a spur of the moment opportunity, so I took advantage. I will add that for each swing shown, the ball flight, direction and distance were almost identical. I was also hitting into a 20-25mph wind. It is a self taught swing with little or no professional help, other than picking up a few tidbits from mags and Nicklaus books from the 70's

Videos:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Oh, and another thing- they all went where I was aiming within a few yards
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd work on just a few things for now.

  1. Understanding how to stretch/bend to achieve the somewhat centered shoulder turn you've managed to make. You'll be able to see the ball better, turn your shoulders farther, and be set up for a more powerful downswing if you get more slant to the hips and shoulders.
  2. Got some weirdness going on with your grip. Post a close-up video of your grip so we can see it better if you're able to.

Beyond that, see the notes in the sticky thread about filming your swing - the angles matter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just noticed that about my grip. It appears that I move my thumb from a "down the shaft" position to a baseball grip somewhere in the takeaway. Have to keep an eye on that one. Other than that, I DO use a fairly strong right hand, so it looks funky up there, I guess. And about the angles- Like I said, I had an opportunity to have someone use my smartphone with an HD Video camera to capture my swing. I did know to have them take all 3 angles as best they could. Then a quick edit in Moviemaker. Maybe in a few weeks, I can a get a better setup to do a more complete capture.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by RayG

I just noticed that about my grip. It appears that I move my thumb from a "down the shaft" position to a baseball grip somewhere in the takeaway. Have to keep an eye on that one. Other than that, I DO use a fairly strong right hand, so it looks funky up there, I guess.

And about the angles- Like I said, I had an opportunity to have someone use my smartphone with an HD Video camera to capture my swing. I did know to have them take all 3 angles as best they could. Then a quick edit in Moviemaker. Maybe in a few weeks, I can a get a better setup to do a more complete capture.

Also you really only need FO and DTL, you should not need video at your back for the purposes here.  Nice tempo, your swing does seem rather under powered though. What Erik is saying would be a big help to you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The power thing is a result of trying to control the swing better instead of trying to swing "for the fences" every time, as it were. In a round at World Woods a day or so later, carry distance with a Callaway Hex Chrome was 240/250... not bad I guess, but part of the problem is almost no roll on the other end- maybe 10-15 yds most times. That's how HIGH my ball flight has become over the years. Currently using: Callaway Diablo Octane Tour 9.5 loft Project X Octane Shaft- 45.5" Maybe that little extra turn (with control) might get me a bit more yards... I appreciate the input folks- keep it coming...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by RayG

The power thing is a result of trying to control the swing better instead of trying to swing "for the fences" every time, as it were. .

Some of it is that, but what those two pictures Erik attached show is that you can add some back in with the same controlled swing.  Your shoulder pitch and turn are taking away a lot of unused power.  You can get more power out of the same effort, making sense?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Am I reading that perhaps the plane is too flat along with a minimal turn? I'd rather not go too past horizontal on the backswing, if only for psychological reasons- too far means less control at the other end. Maybe keep the controlled backswing but unleashing the coil a bit faster would had those yards back?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by RayG

Am I reading that perhaps the plane is too flat along with a minimal turn? I'd rather not go too past horizontal on the backswing, if only for psychological reasons- too far means less control at the other end. Maybe keep the controlled backswing but unleashing the coil a bit faster would had those yards back?

I would turn 90 degrees to the target though in the back swing.  It is not much more than you are.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Looks like a project for the range on Saturday.... Along with that thumb thing. I did start working on a bit more hip rotation over the winter, but didn't feel comfortable using it the first "real" round at WW last week (first round in nearly 3 months and shot an 84). That, I suppose would help in getting more shoulder turn. Enough range hours working with the hips and it will feel better when the NE season hits in a few weeks here in NY. thanks again for the critiques...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just took another look at my swing and noticed one other thing that seemed to be robbing me of some "drive". While at the range this AM working with the new R11s, I realized something- I had almost NO weight transfer. I felt like I was keeping my weight centered through out the whole swing. I was basically swinging around my CG, instead of using it to my advantage to create more of a turn and generate more clubhead speed. It took awhile to figure the amount and technique to keep it from becoming a "sway", but it soon came back to me the way I USED to swing and gave me a yardage jump AND helped get my draw back. Over the years I had developed a swing that was NOT swinging for the fences so I could keep my drives INSIDE the fences. Suppose I got complacent and just fell into that rut. Getting that shift back really felt like it used to and I was happy to get it back... hopefully for good.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your hip shift is more like a gradual sway. That is where I believe a lot of power is being left on the table. The shift occurs throughout your return swing. I feel like the shift should start more abruptly and stabilize giving way to the shoulder turn. Plus I just noticed your weight shift begins before your back swing ends. I would take your back swing and stop at the top then do your weight shift while starting your return swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was another thing I saw as well. While I was swinging AROUND my CG on the back swing, I was shifting on the downswing. My nasty miss is usually a snap hook- if I shift too soon, I try and make up for it with my hands and get the club through too quick and ZING- pull snap... Working on the gradual shift back and forth made a big difference and the misses were a bit of a fade instead. There was not one snap hook at the range after making the change. And yes, I DO try and get my weight shift started forward *just* before the top of the back swing- something I picked up several years ago to get more "coil" and get the hips cleared at impact. thanks for the further input folks...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest update- The snap hooks seemed to have disappeared. Really worked on weight shift and transfer the last two range visits. It has freed up some energy and gained a few yards in the process. I'll try and post up some new clips as soon as I get a chance. Thanks again for all the input.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      Dude, he like, literally, answered some of the questions you're asking in this post in the post you quoted. You are right about one thing, though.  If you're already working with an instructor, you shouldn't be muddying the waters with advice from other sources.  In fact, Erik and Mike make points to not offer advice when they know that, so you should have just mentioned that from the start.
    • My Swing (PumaAttack)
      @mvmac @iacas I have a friend who is also on Evolvr and got feedback today from his coach that his swing is looking great and has no changes at this time. I looked at his swing.  He goes from really shallow at A3 and then slightly steeper at a5.  Why is that ok for him and not for me?  Seems a little hypocritical, eh?
    • 2016 DEAN & DELUCA Invitational
      Still a shot for the top 3 players in the world to all have won the last tournament they played at the same moment in time, which I don't believe has ever happened in the history of the game.  #pgatourhasneverbeenbetter    Ok, that hash tag was a little douchy, but c'mon, this shit is good.
    • Lowest score you've seen?
      Lowest ive ever witnessed is 71 twice by me.Thats saying something considering I play in tournys with very good players.My 71s were not in tourny conditions though.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      But because they play on courses that are considered quite difficult compared to the average home course, wouldn't their up & down % be expected to increase due to having closer misses on average - particularly with slower greens to hold approaches? The comment above is not to discount this, but only emphasize how the two go together. If you apply a fantastic long game on a shorter course on average they will have an easier time being more consistent and hitting the ball closer to the pin on average and therefore making more putts. Or do you think they would have the same expected proximity on one of our home courses as they would on the tougher tour courses and setups? I get you on the tournament prep being very different to hitting a course blind, but to some extent the OP is comparing how we play on our home courses day-in, day-out vs. the tour pros moving from place to place. How would we score visiting a course blind relative to our home course where most of the scores are posted and we are very familiar with the layout and greens. Granted pros make it a point to know this stuff with yardage books and memory. Still switching between venues and conditions rather suddenly vs. gradual changes we would tend to experience on a home course must add some difficulty. I came across a good study that analyzed all PGA tournament scores for 2007 including field average adjustments. He had the unadjusted scoring average that year as 70.704. If you figure the average course setup is ~ CR 75 and add one stroke for 'tournament conditions' (and added difficulty of Major setups) then that was about 5.3 strokes below average rating. So relative to a Course Rating (slope should not matter to a pro), and assuming a standard normal distribution, 95% of the scores should range between -6.7 and -3.9 below the rating. However, his analysis detected two interesting features, the curve (with a ton of samples) is approximately symmetric with a ~ .4 skewness. This right skew means the most frequently expected result (the mode) is actually slightly lower than the mean. So that implies that even on tour setups the lower than average scores are expected just a bit more frequently (the left tail and shoulder are slightly thicker and probability for scores lower than the mode slightly higher.). Here's an approximation of what the distribution would look like relative to strokes below the CR. In comparing courses with higher average scores (like the U.S. Open) the study found that the standard deviation of scores increased. The 'tougher test' created more of a separation between the players. Also the players whose scores tended to skew left were poorer players on average in terms of results. They averaged a relatively high score, but they could go really low sometimes. The relevance this has to the thread is that on the easier home courses that most of us tend to play, the tour players would be more bunched in their expected scores with higher probabilities around the mean of -5.3 relative to the CR and possibly more toward the low side with the left-skewing, less-consistent scorers reducing the size of the right tail and extending the left while holding the 'field average' the same. It could skew the distribution toward lower expected score (though the most frequently expected value would still be around the mode). But what would you expect as a total spread for the average scratch population? You agree that with the average population of golfers by handicap there's a decrease in score variability with increasing skill versus the average population at each handicap level having the same average scoring distribution, yes? IMO, the answer to the OP greatly depends on the CR. On my course from the tips, they'd be expected to shoot under 65 over 50% of the time. On a CR of 72, I'd expect  below 67 over 50% of the time. At Oakmont (in non-Open setup), under 73 over 50% of the time. And that would be without accounting for a possible 'going low' effect from the typically easier home course setups we face (not including Oakmont there. They would face some hazards you don't find on tour either - lost balls could be an issue for some. I'm not sure I agree that they'd expect to putt worse. At the least because I would expect their proximity to the hole to increase on all shots due to the typically shorter length (shorter irons on average into each hole) along with relatively slower, softer greens.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bigtosh90
      bigtosh90
      (26 years old)
    2. dopplegvnger
      dopplegvnger
      (24 years old)
    3. Frank62
      Frank62
      (54 years old)
  • Blog Entries