Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MarcTremors

Light Head Driver + Heavy Shaft

6 posts in this topic

Okay guys so I currently have a Cleveland SL290 but I replaced the crazy light miyazaki shaft with an ACCRA AC65 and cut it down to 44.5. Since doing this I find I have had a lot more control, I have a swing speed of 95mph but my shot tendancy is still a slight fade or a slice, never straight, I've been considering changing the shaft out to a 75 gram shaft instead to get some more stability.  I really love this driver when I hit it, I hit it but I'm not quite consistent enough, I've also been debating ordering one of clevelands TL310 heads that are just a bit heavier and throwing my AC65 into that, after demoing a nike covert tour I've found a new love for smaller driver heads I feel more confident with them. Anyways, any thoughts on how much a 75 gram shaft would throw off the balance of the sl290? Is it a bad idea to have such a heavy shaft in such a light head?

Thanks a ton guys!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Actually it isn't that light weight of a club head. Its about 198 grams, which is pretty typical. Most drivers range from 180-210 grams. 200 grams really has been the sweet spot for club head weight for a long time now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is tough to say. Swing weight is a subjective thing. I found even if you cut a shaft down, and add extra weight to the head, it doesn't really feel the same. Smaller shafts just feel quicker to me no matter what the swing weight, less of an arc. A heavier shaft, you will feel the club more in your swing, their will just be more weight overall. I prefer heavier golf shafts, but I have a very high swing speed.

You will probably end up getting a bit more consistency out of the driver, but you might loose distance if the swing speed changes because it is heavier.

I say just go demo some golf clubs. Maybe find a new one that is similar to the Cleveland, and try out different shafts with with different weights. Just see which ones give you the best feel.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Anyways, any thoughts on how much a 75 gram shaft would throw off the balance of the sl290? Is it a bad idea to have such a heavy shaft in such a light head?

What length?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well I might start out with it a little longer than my current one, try to make up for the extra weight with some length, so maybe 45/45.5?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • 2016 BMW PGA Championship at Wentworth
      Nice to see Chris Wood win this,well done.He tends to play well in the British Open with a best T3 at Turnberry maybe this win will spur him on. Surely another Ryder cup player.
    • Your best golfing bargain
      I got two: Played Orange County National (Orlando) for 50 dollar. Including lunch and both Crooked cat and Panther lake. And got vouchers to play the course next time for half the normal price. Played a three day tourney in Sauerland (Germany) including a pré tourney round for 220 dollar. During the three days ALL drinks for free, food for free, last day dinner for free. Not just a hamburger, but full fetched all you can eat top meal (and again all drinks for free). Will be back next year 
    • GPS, WHY ?
      It comes down to how big are your shot zones. It's usually better to try to line up the shot zone center to the center of the green.
    • Are you a Better Golfer than a Year Ago?
      And confirmation. Last year I played a three day tournament in Germany and scored 82, 86 and 91. Same tourney this year 80, 83 and 86. Happy 
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      Here's some more below about the lowest you might expect - even on an easy course. I think this is largely true, but pros don't tend to play a lot on 'easy' courses so there doesn't seem to be even much anecdotal stuff. The quote below describes what's considered the 'perfect round'. I guess you could also consider a 'go-for-green' perfect round where you also hit all the par 5's in two and one-putted those for eagle for a 'go-for-green perfect' score of 50. Obviously the likelihood of doing this in a single round defies the essence of golf, but it's a good a hard theoretical lower limit that probably depends more on the par than the course rating. Likely the odds grow exponentially as the percentage of birdied / eagled holes rises. I think we can discount albatrosses as a 'perfect round' option. Most tournament pro scores don't get below 56 and 59 with about an 80/20 rule separating the more frequent 59s from the 58's. That's 4-5 strokes (assuming par 72) over the 'perfect round' and 8-9 over the 'go-for-green perfect round', each of which represent grabbing about 75% and 61% respectively of the potential shots under par realistically available. I suppose a short par-4 would add another potential eagle opportunity, but we'll discount that as I'm not sure how universal they are. The lowest tournament round was 55 (par of 71) by one single golfer out of how many total tournament rounds by pros and plus HCP amateurs over the years? So while 55 is humanly achievable it's super rare and likely represents the lower limit of any possible likelihood. That would put the absolute lowest threshold around 17.8 below the course rating (72.8) and 16 below par. So there's a lot of room to go below even a low course rating or par of 70. I don't think the expected scores would get too squished and the distribution would still likely be normal in shape. The thing that is probably unrealistic is how narrow the range of expected scores is. The field is extremely consistent, but I think a single individual player (whose average score is the same as the field) will have a score variance significantly larger than the field. I think the mode likely stays the same while the distribution flattens / spreads out more into the tails with a little more probability to both go low and high and less certainty of shooting within a stroke or two of the mode / most likely score.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries