• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
aaronwright21

Titleist AP2 714

10 posts in this topic

So I've searched for AP2 reviews and most of them seem to be from 2010 and before.  I want to know if anybody has the AP2 714 and what they think about them.  I just ordered new AP2's after getting fitted for them.  Should come in about 2 weeks I was told.  I'm 6'4'' about 210 lbs. I'm trying to take my game to the next level after shooting in the 80's consistently for the past year and a half.  I play about 3-4 times a week and I'm 22 so in my prime.  I'm swinging callaway RAZR X Black irons right now.  I like them but they are standard size and everybody has been telling me they are too short.  I ordered my new AP2's 4-GW with an inch extension, 3 degrees forward adjustment angle lie, and midsize grips.  Will these be a lot tougher to hit than my current set of irons? They felt really good when I swung them in the shop but I'm not sure how accurate the computer program is.  I'm super anxious to get them and see how I play with them.  If anybody has any insight or reviews it would be much appreciated! Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Check out our staff review

http://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/titleist_714_ap2_irons_review

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Thanks mvmac.


I saw that review but I just wanted to hear if any users had any opinions about them

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only offer insight between the AP1 and AP2.  I honestly didn't notice that much of a difference between the two during a round where I would hit my AP1 and then my buddy's AP2 (same club).  For example the 8i, same distance, nearly same flight, height, roll-out, etc.  Ap2 felt much crisper but that was probably a mental thing because looking down at that thinner top line is very appealing to the eye.

In addition if you have several mishits a round like me, the AP2's will likely punish you a bit more.  Example I hit my 4i AP2 on a long par 3, mishit on the toe but it still ran long and ended up greenside.  Tried the AP2, felt like same shot same mistake (toe) and the ball only went about 2/3 as far with roughly the same swing speed.  Clearly the ap2s are less forgiving but that's just something that you sacrifice to look at the topline.

What I can say is good God the AP2's look so sexy at address, AP1s are shovels but they work for me.

Enjoy your new set! :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback TJ! :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tried out the AP2 S300, and it was really sweet. 4 shots with the 714-AP2 7i and all 4 were reasonably in the sweet spot. Much easier to hit than my MP-32 clubs. I also want to try out the JPX-850 forged, but they did not have any for me to tape up.

I really like the thinner sole on the AP2, and the club head is nearly as small as the MP-32. Cool club. Checking out the review. . .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I got my AP2 714's last spring, with the KBS shafts.  My previous irons were Mizuno MP30s with DG S300.  I find the AP2 to be a little more forgiving, and I launch the ball a little higher.  Based on the fitting with our club pro, the higher launch is primarily a function of the shaft.  Last summer was my best golf ever, at age 58, got to a 3.7 index and stayed there for a while.  I'm happy with them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I got my AP2 714's last spring, with the KBS shafts.  My previous irons were Mizuno MP30s with DG S300.  I find the AP2 to be a little more forgiving, and I launch the ball a little higher.  Based on the fitting with our club pro, the higher launch is primarily a function of the shaft.  Last summer was my best golf ever, at age 58, got to a 3.7 index and stayed there for a while.  I'm happy with them.

Roughly how much higher launch were you getting from the KBS shafts versus the S300?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

It's hard to quantify, we didn't use a launch monitor. I'd say it's like a club difference, I hit a six like i used to hit the seven, but six iron length.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

It's hard to quantify, we didn't use a launch monitor. I'd say it's like a club difference, I hit a six like i used to hit the seven, but six iron length.


Thanks for the response, and that's kind of what I would expect. Sounds really good.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Putting Yips
      Ive recently gone from a belly to a 34" putter. Really liked the the belly putter but struggled with distance control. after practicing with the short putter i seem to have more control. Will be keeping the belly though for when i get a older or the back starts to protest!  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke 90, 1 career eagle.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      No problem.  I'm not tired of responding to sincere and thoughtful posts, like yours, even if it rehashes stuff from before because OF COURSE it is unrealistic to expect people to read 3000 posts before commenting.  In any case I have that quote in a file and it was simple to post it - much simpler and politer than saying "go find it , it's here."  I DO think that one should maybe at least read a smattering of such a big thread before jumping in,   But I have no patience whatsoever with the "I saw Jack play" and "he was nice at a clinic" type posts or posts by people who try to claim some special credibility because of some entirely personal subjective connection.  But that isn't you. As to the rest, you asked for the exact quote and I gave it to you.  If you want to argue with what he said, that is another matter and does not concern me, since my position is that even if we, arguendo, say that the field strengths did NOT get better, Tiger's career was so much more dominant than Jack's that it doesn't matter.  I don't NEED to make a stronger field argument to make the case that Tiger dominated golf in a way and to an extent that no other golfer has ever dominated golf.  And he did it for 15 years (after an absolutely unprecedented career as an amateur) which, IMO, is long enough that it no longevity argument could overcome the sheer dominance advantage his career embodied.   The fact that all that is true in the face of field strength increasing is just icing on the cake.   
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Excellent. Thank you for re-posting that quote. Sorry to hear you're tired of rehashing. Why not just let the thread die then? Is the expectation that folks will read all 272 pages before making a comment? That strikes me as an unrealistic expectation.. I agree the tour is tougher than it used to be. I consider the differences more incremental than astronomical...not the 'order of magnitude' range that seems to come through in some comments. I think Jack is both being accurate in assessing his perception of a shift in quality, but also exaggerating for effect or experiencing present-day myopia at the very least about the money. $100 in 1962 money would be ~ $800 dollars today. Not exactly what I would call bus fare. The 'paltry' $100,000 had the buying power of about $800,000 in today's dollars, which is ~ 60% of today's average purse and ~ 30% of the Players' purse).. Most Americans would happily take an annual salary like that today. They weren't getting ditch digger wages. The prize money even then definitely attracted keen competitive interest. Clearly purses have also grown more than inflation and even journeyman make more in a year than the top 10 in 1962 (below), but it seems about in line with the growth of the population of golfers in the U.S. itself - about triple since Jack's day, Endorsement money has definitely gotten bigger, as the tour and the golf marketplace have developed and expanded over time.   Rank       Player                  1962 $                   2015 $ 1            Arnold Palmer        $81,448                 $639,223 2            Gene Littler           $66,201                 $519,562 3            Jack Nicklaus         $61,869                 $485,563 4            Billy Casper            $61,842                 $485,351 5            Bob Goalby            $46,241                 $362,910 6            Gary Player            $45,838                 $359,748 7            Doug Sanders        $43,340                 $340,143 8            Dave Ragan          $37,327                 $292,951 9            Bobby Nichols       $34,312                 $269,288 10          Phil Rodgers          $32,182                 $252,572  
    • Claim Your Achievements Here!
      Broke par, Lowest Score Wins. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries