Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6197 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So David Pelz's short game bible has become a standard, but so many people think that Phil Mickelson is a short game wizard.

I need to start getting up and down along with knocking down a 15 footer here and there. Who's product should I espouse, Pelz's book or Lefty's DVDs? These seem like the big 2, but I'm open to other suggestions. I want something that has fundamental knowledge; something that's timeless and will still make sense in 40 years.

Thanks.

Ben Hogan is my swing coach.

Driver: Burner TP
3 & 5 Woods: No-name
3H:No-name4i-PW: MP-32...unapologetically...You should try blades, too56*: CG12Putter: Spider


Posted
So David Pelz's short game bible has become a standard, but so many people think that Phil Mickelson is a short game wizard.

well pelz is phils short game coach,but i tend to learn better visually if your like me i would rather watch a dvd verses reading how in a book


Posted
Another good book is the art of the shortgame by stan utley.

A quote from Kris
...is that college bball really isn't "lower tier". The better teams have their rosters filled with guys who could play in the NBA. hell, guys used to come straight from high school to the NBA. I really don't think there's much of a difference skill-wise between the two.


Posted
I picked up Phills CD and it is great.

In my new FT carry bag
FT-9 Tour nuetral 9.5
FT-15 degree 3 wood
Fussion Hybrids #2&4
Fussion irons with Grapholoy Pro launch Red shafts56&60 Cally X forged wedges with Red shaftsSG9 putterCally I ballBushnell Meadealist range finder


Posted
Pelz' book has good insight, but is overlong and self congratulatory. You can get it used very cheap--they often have it at half price books---multiple Texas locations (where I got mine)

The entire book can be sumarized--- use four wedges (I choose PW, GW, SW, LW)
and three backswing positions. 7:30 9:00 10:30
The book meanders and loses focus. He states how important tempo is in chapter one, then spends 400 pages on mechanics and exact postitions/straight lines. IMO, he loses the importance of feel throughout his teaching of the short game and putting.

I don't agree on his bunker method (opening way up and hitting way behind the ball). Nor do I believe most can strike putts consistently with straight back and straight through (too much manipulation in the forearms to keep the face straight on line)

I prefer Tom Watson's getting up and down 40 yards and in. http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Up-Dow.../dp/0394753003

Phil's DVD may be great, but I can't buy it soley on the statement in the ad that he is "the best short game player ever"

Check out Utley's DVDs and books for the short game.
http://www.amazon.com/Art-Short-Game...5637318&sr;=8-2

http://www.amazon.com/Art-Putting-Re...5637318&sr;=8-3

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333


Posted
I would consider Stan Utley's book as well. It really helped me. And I used to be a Pelz guy (I still am, from about 100 yards to about 30 yards.)

But I think which style will work for you depends on you.
Are you a feel player?
Or are you more mechanical when you stand over the ball?
When you were looking for an instructor, did you prefer those that analyzed every little aspect of your swing and put you on video?
Or did you prefer instructors that focused on swinging loosely and "letting the club swing you"?

If you favor the analytical and mechanical aspects, I think Pelz will work well for you.

If you favor "feel", then Utley will probably work better.

--------------------------
"There are only 3 kinds of people in this world -- Those who can count, and those who can't."


  • Moderator
Posted
The Pelz/Utley thing is going to be ALL up you and your game. They are both great ways of doing it. I read Utley's book and I am a feel player but it just fealt really weird and I didn't give it enough time. I may try it again later because it is a very simple concept.

I also like the idea of being able to watch what is being taught on video.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I like both. I am waiting on the mickelson DVD and curious about the chipping. It is totally different than pelz. As far as bunker play, I do not see how you could think any other way than pelz's way is better. I liked the short game bible. I am excited about the DVD. I agree that Utliey could be looked at.

Brian


Posted
As far as bunker play, I do not see how you could think any other way than pelz's way is better.

Once I got the hang of Utley's bunker style, I find it MUCH easier to get the ball out. It even spins and checks up sometimes.

--------------------------
"There are only 3 kinds of people in this world -- Those who can count, and those who can't."


Posted
Once I got the hang of Utley's bunker style, I find it MUCH easier to get the ball out. It even spins and checks up sometimes.

To each there own. Most pros play with an open club face, open stance, hitting a half inch to 2 inches behind the ball. I have not read his book but I am planning on it (utley's). But with the way I play them, there is such a margin for error (if I hit too close to the ball will fly farther with spin and vice versa) that it makes it too easy. I do have my odd terrrible ones where I hit it thin or don't commit and lose focus, but I am very happy with my bunker play over all.

Brian


Posted
To each there own. Most pros play with an open club face, open stance, hitting a half inch to 2 inches behind the ball. I have not read his book but I am planning on it (utley's). But with the way I play them, there is such a margin for error (if I hit too close to the ball will fly farther with spin and vice versa) that it makes it too easy. I do have my odd terrrible ones where I hit it thin or don't commit and lose focus, but I am very happy with my bunker play over all.

I should note that I play with a *slightly* open clubface, and do hit an inch or two behind the ball. The main difference in the Utley style is setup, and using a very steep wristy swing. Hard to describe. Anyway, I was a terrible bunker player before, so its possible that my improvement is just due to more practice... or its in my head. Either way, its working so I won't mess with it!

--------------------------
"There are only 3 kinds of people in this world -- Those who can count, and those who can't."


Posted
I should note that I play with a *slightly* open clubface, and do hit an inch or two behind the ball. The main difference in the Utley style is setup, and using a very steep wristy swing. Hard to describe. Anyway, I was a terrible bunker player before, so its possible that my improvement is just due to more practice... or its in my head. Either way, its working so I won't mess with it!

I agree. I should read that book. People seem to speak very highly of it.

Brian


Posted
I am not a huge fan of Pelz...his book is much to analytical, with to much written about his research this research that, and not enough on some of the mechanics. there was not much on practice drills either, unless you want to buy all of his practice aids. I would go with Utley or Mickelson's DVD's. Can't say anything about the DVD's yet, but I have heard good things.

R7 SuperQuad 10.5 Aldila nv 65-s
Burner 15 UST proforce V2
Pro Gold Tour Prototype 23 Matrix Ozik
Pro Gold Tour Prototype 18 Matrix Ozik
AP2 5-PW Vokey SM52.08Vokey SM56.10Vokey SM60.04 Studio Style Newport 2


Note: This thread is 6197 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.