Jump to content
IGNORED

Interesting episode of Mythbusters last night


kfowler
Note: This thread is 5269 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I saw a great episode of Mythbusters last night. The myth was that a dirty car actually got better fuel economy than a clean car. The myth was based on the dimples of a golf ball vs. a smooth surface.

They started by having a PGA pro hit a golf ball with no dimples. I think the average was around 183 yards. He thin hit a normal golf ball and averaged around 280 yards. The interesting part was I always assumed that the dimples helped improve lift therefore causing the ball to go further. They were saying that the dimples reduced drag.

Their next test was to take a car and cover it in smooth clay molding. They drove around a 1 mile track at 65 mph and recorded the fuel economy. They then added dimples to the clay molding to resemble a golf ball and conducted the same test. It looked really cool.

I was shocked at the results. I was expecting the smooth car to actually get better or same gas mileage as the dimpled car. Since I believed that the dimples provided lift, I didn't see how the car would benefit. The dimpled car actually got 11% better fuel economy than the smooth car. The drag on the dimpled car was significantly less than the smooth. Wow!!!!

BTW, they also tested a really dirty car and it got the worst fuel economy. So you really need to add dimples to improve your gas mileage.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I saw that too... great episode! The car with the dimples was pretty wild looking... who knows, maybe the car comanies will take notice and use some dimple technology to improve mileage?! With all the talk of hybrids and new ways to improve gas mileage, I have never thought about changing the body of the car.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


When you get into fluid mechanics, normal intuition and "logic" don't usually hold true (ex. dimples will reduce drag).

I just remember being in Fluid Mechanics back when I was in school and reading the book and all the equations and how almost every single one of them was based upon empirical data and not on any type of derivation at all. You'd read the explanation of each equation, and it'd basically say, "We really don't know what's going on and can't really explain it all that well, but this funky looking equation with seven different fudge factors in it kinda fits what should be going on most of the time. If that's not close to what you are seeing, try this other crazy equation with thirteen different random fudge factors." That was when I first realized I needed to stop reading the textbooks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


That's it,I'm getting the hammer and going to customize my truck,this gas is too expensive That's amazing how that works.

aeroburner tp 10.5 stiff
superfast tp 2.0 3 wood stiff
Halo 25 and taylormade tp 19 degree hybrids
miura cb 202 and wedge
tp 52* wedge, tp 56* taylormade spider mallet putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That was a pretty good episode. I like how the other "required" the guys to get shitfaced on different kinds of alcohol to test hangovers. Tough work there....

What shocked me more than the golf ball car though is how ridiculously pregnant Kari is. Good God.

The bag:

Driver: Taylormade R7 Limited (10.5*)
3-wood: Taylormade R7 st (15*)
5-wood: Titleist 909 F2(18.5*)Irons: Taylormade RAC TP MB; Project-X 6.0 (3-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin-Milled 52.08 Vokey Spin-Milled 58.12Putter: Odyssey White Hot Tour #1 (33")Ball: Titleist ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That was a pretty good episode. I like how the other "required" the guys to get shitfaced on different kinds of alcohol to test hangovers. Tough work there....

Yeah I had no idea she was pregnant. That caught me off guard. The "Beer before liquor, never been sicker" myth was hilarious. I loved when they started jumping all over things.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What sort of car was it?

I wonder because you'll notice that things like aircraft are not dimpled. I presume that, if you've got a fixed not-particularly-aerodynamic form, dimpling it can help. If you're free to design your surfaces to control air flow, it could be the case that it's less of a boost -- if your wings already follow the airflow lamina, there will be a lot less drag to cut. I seem to recall hearing about smaller-scale surface textures being used in some cases, but I dunno...

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What sort of car was it?

It looked like a late 90's Ford Taurus. And the gain was a bit more than 11%. That isn't just a curiosity... that's a significant improvement. Likely the only reason nobody has actually done it is the fear that no one would buy a car that looked that strange. But if gas gets to $5 a gallon, they might find a market...

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Likely the only reason nobody has actually done it is the fear that no one would buy a car that looked that strange.

I'm sure that's a major piece of it. I'm also not sure how cost effective it would be to stamp body skins with lot's of dimples.

The plane idea is really interesting.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Actually, a friend of mine in college, who was an aeronautical engineering major, bought a hail-damaged car. 1) It was cheaper, and 2) he knew it would get better gas mileage.

Brad Eisenhauer

In my bag:
Driver: Callaway Hyper X 10° | Fairway Wood: GigaGolf PowerMax GX920 3W (15°) | Hybrid: GigaGolf PowerMax GX920 3 (20°)
Irons: Mizuno MX-25 4-PW | Wedges: GigaGolf Tradition SGS Black 52°, 56°, 60° | Putter: GigaGolf CenterCut Classic SP3

Ball: Titleist ProV1x or Bridgestone B330S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dude! All you had to do was watch the Simpson's episode where Homer puts speed holes in his car. That dude knows what he is doing...

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
They started by having a PGA pro hit a golf ball with no dimples. I think the average was around 183 yards. He thin hit a normal golf ball and averaged around 280 yards.

183 yards? Wow.

We actually reviewed some dimple-less golf balls. The review is here . Those things went NOWHERE. Maybe 183 included roll? I hit those things as far in the air with a 9I as I did with a driver. I'd buy a dimpled car. 11% is a LOT of mileage savings... wow.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

183 yards? Wow.

It looked like they did include roll.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Interesting note: The principle that a rough surfaced ball flies farther than a smooth ball was discovered accidentally back in the days of the gutta percha ball. Players used to have to remold the ball back into shape after use, because the rubber was so malleable that the ball would be out of round and quite beat up after play. A player with some sort of scientific background, through laziness or time constraints, failed to repair his ball when it should have been done, and he observed that the out of shape ball was consistently flying farther than usual, and farther than the balls of his opponents. He started doing some testing and found that the ball's aerodynamic properties were significantly improved by roughing up that smooth surface.

That was the start of the long and still ongoing experiment to find the most effective dimple form and pattern for a golf ball.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What sort of car was it?

Actually, a friend of mine in college, who was an aeronautical engineering major, bought a hail-damaged car. 1) It was cheaper, and 2) he knew it would get better gas mileage.

When you get into drag/lift questions concerning airflow, you can't compare two different situations and just assume that the same type of results will be seen. Different situations have different coefficants of drag, Reynolds numbers, type of flow (laminar or turbulant), and so on. You can't simply just punch a ton of dents in a surface and expect the coefficient of drag to decrease. The "dents" have to be the correct size, shape, and arrangement for you so see any type of positive gain.

Also, at least in terms of the plane, you have to look at how any change in design affects BOTH drag AND lift. It won't be much of a plane without lift.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


When you get into drag/lift questions concerning airflow, you can't compare two different situations and just assume that the same type of results will be seen. Different situations have different coefficants of drag, Reynolds numbers, type of flow (laminar or turbulant), and so on. You can't simply just punch a ton of dents in a surface and expect the coefficient of drag to decrease. The "dents" have to be the correct size, shape, and arrangement for you so see any type of positive gain.

Definitely. My thinking about the aircraft was that it seems unlikely that dimpling one up would make a 10% difference in mileage or they'd all be dimpled-- the aesthetic concerns that would make this difficult for a car would generally not apply to planes. So there's probably some reason-- either they've already gained that mileage through more careful design, or it interferes with lift as you suggest.

There was an obituary for Richard Whitcomb in the paper last week. He invented/designed the little winglets that angle upward at the ends of large aircraft wings. According to the obit, these increase fuel efficiency by as much as 7% by reducing turbulence. Pretty amazing...

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


i believe it went from 26.0 mpg to 29.8 mpg . .. that's a pretty huge increase honestly... I as well was extremely impressed

What's In My Bag?
Driver : Diablo
3wood : Diablo
Hybrid : 3DX RC Ironwood #3 20*
Irons : j36 cb's Putter : Tour Platinum 7081Ball : TP Black LDPHome Course :Lonnie Poole Golf Course at NC State University 74.7/134Eagle Ridge Golf Club 73.0/131

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5269 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...