Jump to content
IGNORED

Driver lifespan.


Snakey
Note: This thread is 4298 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Maybe this has been discussed before but do Drivers have a finite life?..Are golfers doing themselves a disservice by sticking to the tried and true at the expense of their game....Maybe the new Ti or composite drivers aren't a problem but the older types must have metal fatigue after being hit at up to100mph+ time after time over the years thereby changing the dynamics of the head and losing distance and control. When people say they aren't getting the distance they used to and blame it on getting older could be time to update.Looking back at what I just wrote I remembered talking to two guys lately whose Ti drivers had split on the face in the first year ,normal guys not built like Arnie S ,so maybe it's not just the older models that are a problem. Anybody have an idea on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


A finite life?   A driver may last 50 years before it fails.  Whether or not or if/when it fails is impossible to predict.....

My take on drivers:

I like to update my driver every 3-4 years for no other reason than to stay current with modern driver technology.  I rarely buy new clubs.  I'm not a "club collector" ....to be sure.  I find what works and stick with it for years.....

When it comes to metal woods/hybrids, I like to stay more current...............and this comment is coming from a guy who's only used 2 different sets of irons and 2 putters over the past 15+years!

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Depends on the driver and the person swinging it.  On Sunday they made everyone stop practice on the range so a guy could run out and retrieve his new R11S driver head that broke off after he mis-swung and slammed the mat with it repeatedly.  About 15 minutes later we were asked to stop again so he could run out and pick up his new RBZ 3w head that he did the same thing to.   In that case driver lifespan was about 10 minutes.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Buckeye is wrong. Drivers definitely do lose elasticity due to metal fatique on the club face. I dont know what the lifespan is, im sure 4 years is fine, but metal fatique is a very real thing in high impact plates like those used on a driver.

As for irons/wedges/putters, they are thick and heavily built. They will last until they are so beaten up you hate looking at them.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

A finite life?   A driver may last 50 years before it fails.  Whether or not or if/when it fails is impossible to predict.....

My take on drivers:

I like to update my driver every 3-4 years for no other reason than to stay current with modern driver technology.  I rarely buy new clubs.  I'm not a "club collector"....to be sure.  I find what works and stick with it for years.....

When it comes to metal woods/hybrids, I like to stay more current...............and this comment is coming from a guy who's only used 2 different sets of irons and 2 putters over the past 15+years!

I agree with the second part ....keeping up with technology.....but the first part might be like the museum that had George Washingtons original hatchet that had two new heads and three new handles.lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Im new here and just had to comment on this. New drivers only last about 5,000 shots, not alot if you practice more than most people. Ive owned 4 TM drivers in the last four years. Smashed in the faces and even seen my old mans titleist 975j cave in. if you swing like a caveman, a driver will only last you maybe 3+ years. Thats takin it easy. IMHO
Link to comment
Share on other sites


i have hit the crap out of my driver for 5 years now and its still just fine.  No face caving, no cracking, no loss of distance, no nothing.  If you hit rocks and range balls you might could crack one in 4 years but I've hit 1000's of drives with it and not had a problem.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I used the same Callaway Big Bertha driver for nearly 8 years and never had any problems with it.  The only damage to the club was the shaft was actually weakening and I was fearing it would snap on me.  That is the only reason I purchased a newer model driver.  The first couple years of owning the club I was in high school and played several times a week and visited the range very frequently and never noticed any damage to the clubhead itself.  When it comes to results the only difference between my two drivers is shapability (if that's a word).  I can shape my shots better with the newer one, the distance is roughly the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Its all about club speed.

I have had one shaft last more that 2 months. And 1 clubface last more that a year.   Granted during those same times i broke multiple shafts and a few faces.  But those in particular seem to be solid.   The TM Burner 2.0 is the longest running head ive had.  Ive broken 5-6 shafts on the club, but the head remains rock solid.  Great club head.

If you swing 100-115 you should have the driver until you break it over you knee.

If you swing 125-135+ you will break them monthly if not weekly.

I've broken 3x more shafts that faces, so I would say you could use the same head for forever (why would you want to?)  I'd replace the shaft anyhow because i hate stock shafts myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Unless youre a pro who practices every day, chances are you will never stress a driver to the point of metal fatigue.  However, it is a good idea to update drivers every 5 years or so simply because by that time driver technology has advanced enough where its worth upgrading.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have broken two drivers, one new and one used about 5 years, The new one was a TM 580XD that broke in the heel. The other was a Ping G5 that cracked in the face. The new drivers I tried, before getting a Ping G20, all hit the ball with a lot less spin than the older driver, The result was a straighter shot that launched higher, flattend out, and ran more after landing, I can't really say that drivers have a finite life, but the the improvement in the technology over several generations of drivers, would factor into how long a driver stays in my bag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My brother took a driver from the pro-shop to "test-drive"  for nine holes.... they put some tape on the face,  and he cracked the face.   He has a ridiculously (had perhaps)  high swing speed,  I wish I could claim it was me!

I hit my Hawk-eye VFT that I got a year or so after it came out used,  until about 2 weeks ago.   110-115 swing-speed,  and I would be surprised if there was any metal fatigue that affected it's playability,  but I could be wrong.   I haven't played my "usual"  courses since getting a new driver,  so I'm curious to see how much technology has changed in 15 years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Apparently, the weld can fail where the face is welded to the rest of the body, usually around the outside of the scoring on the face.  Here is a pic of my tour burner tp.  The plasma weld is failing (help with diagnosis from Tom Wishon), so I have taken it out of service.  Taylormade cares not what happened to it, but that's neither here nor there.....  But yes, they can fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would think number of hits rather than number of years would impact the life span of a club.  I've had a Taylormade Metalwood driver since the mid 80's and it still hits just fine.  Although I don't use it anymore.  Surprisingly that old club is only about 20 yards shorter than my Nike VR-S. but the club head and sweet spot is about half the size of the Nike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have an old Mizuno T-zoid driver that shows no real damage but after the years I have put it through just began to feel dead.  I lost around 15 to 20 yards with it and then got an olf Callaway VFT given to me by my father in law and hit it well for a while.  It wasn't until just recently that I got my Callaway diablo octane driver and surpass the VFT by about 15 yards.  I would say the quality of the club has something to do with the lifespan but they do in fact have a lifespan.  I too like to get something new every 3 to 4 years due to metal fatigue and newer technology.

Driver: CALLAWAY Diablo Octane 9.5*

Woods: CALLAWAY Diablo Octane 15*

Hybrid: CALLAWAY Diablo Edge 21*

Irons: CLEVELAND TA7 3-PW

Wedges: CLEVELAND 588 51*, 56*, and (60* on standby)

Putter: ODYSSEY DFX 1100 mallet

Bag: NIKE Performance Carry (Lime green/Grey)

Ball: NIKE One Tour D

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4298 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
    • Of course there's not a simple or knowable answer here. But the whole Caitlin Clark phenomenon is a nice example IMO. Suddenly there was wall to wall media coverage and national attention and... the women's tournament got similar ratings to the men's and much higher ratings than the men in the final four. With every indication that there will be some portion of the uptick that remains going forward. And there's the whole element that Sue Bird brought up. That basketball needed a pretty enough white superstar guard. One who looks like the "cute little white girls" that describes most of the soccer USWNT that's been able to achieve much higher popularity than any version of women's basketball, which is dominated by black players and none of any race who could be described as little... I do think women's sports are in a good place to start taking off more though. It's really only in the coming 5-10 years that the majority of girls will start to come of age with post Title IX grandmothers (as in their grandmothers were allowed to be serious athletes). I don't follow men's or women's basketball much, but in golf for sure the women's tour has gotten much deeper over the past 20 years and only looks to keep going in that direction. I've heard the same about women's basketball. And the patriarchal attitudes that socialized girls out of sports and everyone out of women's sports fandom aren't gone but have def diminished.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...