Jump to content
IGNORED

Replaying from original spot


SCfanatic35
Note: This thread is 4116 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

2 of my competitors yesterday were arguing over these 2 possible situations that never arose, but they still were arguing over them.

Situation #1. Ball is hit into a bunker, player decides he wants to hit again from his original spot under penalty of stroke and distance. Is that allowed?    I am aware of taking an unplayable in a bunker, so the ball must be dropped in the bunker.

Situation #2. Ball is played forward, hits a tree and goes behind the player. His ball rolls into a bush and wants to take an unplayable lie. Can he choose the option of playing from his original spot even though it is closer to the hole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yes to both questions. You always have the option to play stroke and distance. Rule 27-1a. 27-1. Stroke and Distance; Ball Out of Bounds; Ball Not Found Within Five Minutes a. Proceeding Under S troke and Distance At any time, a player may, under penalty of one stroke, play a ball as nearly as possible at the spot from which the original ball was last played (see Rule 20-5), i.e., proceed under penalty of stroke and distance. Except as otherwise provided in the Rules, if a player makes a stroke at a ball from the spot at which the original ball was last played, he is deemed to have proceeded under penalty of stroke and distance.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes to situation #1.

No to Situation #2  a player has the option to drop (unplayable from where ball came to rest) with penalty, but not from where shot was played from. The player played his shot and that shot resulted in an unplayable situation deemed by the player. When the player deemed his ball unplayable in the bush, his options would be 2 club lengths from where ball lies (never closer to the hole) or they may take line of pin and go as far as they deem away from hole.

Situations where a player has the option to drop from the position the ball was played from, examples are:

Re Teeing the ball when lost or deemed OB

Ball lost on course

Ball in Water Hazard

Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

2 of my competitors yesterday were arguing over these 2 possible situations that never arose, but they still were arguing over them.

Situation #1. Ball is hit into a bunker, player decides he wants to hit again from his original spot under penalty of stroke and distance. Is that allowed?    I am aware of taking an unplayable in a bunker, so the ball must be dropped in the bunker.

Situation #2. Ball is played forward, hits a tree and goes behind the player. His ball rolls into a bush and wants to take an unplayable lie. Can he choose the option of playing from his original spot even though it is closer to the hole?

Just for an example, look at this situation.  A player has a slippery 25 foot downhill putt to hole cut just 7 feet from the edge of the green.  He strike the ball a bit too hard and it cruises past the hole, over the fringe, down a slope and into a water hazard.  The drop a from the hazard would be on the far side of the water, leaving a 100 yard shot.  The player is still allowed to choose the option under rule 26-1a and play again from the previous spot, with a one stroke penalty, even though that is much closer to the hole.  The same is true when proceeding under Rule 28 for an unplayable lie, and it's always up to the player to determine this.  He can declare a ball unplayable at any place on the course outside of a water hazard.  The stroke and distance option is actually the first option listed in the procedure (Rule 28a).  When the ball lies unplayable in a water hazard, then you are required to proceed under Rule 26-1, but the same option is offered under 26-1a.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Club Rat

Yes to situation #1.

No to Situation #2  a player has the option to drop (unplayable from where ball came to rest) with penalty, but not from where shot was played from. The player played his shot and that shot resulted in an unplayable situation deemed by the player. When the player deemed his ball unplayable in the bush, his options would be 2 club lengths from where ball lies (never closer to the hole) or they may take line of pin and go as far as they deem away from hole.

Situations where a player has the option to drop from the position the ball was played from, examples are:

Re Teeing the ball when lost or deemed OB

Ball lost on course

Ball in Water Hazard

Club Rat

You are wrong.  Look it up.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Club Rat

Yes to situation #1.

No to Situation #2  a player has the option to drop (unplayable from where ball came to rest) with penalty, but not from where shot was played from. The player played his shot and that shot resulted in an unplayable situation deemed by the player. When the player deemed his ball unplayable in the bush, his options would be 2 club lengths from where ball lies (never closer to the hole) or they may take line of pin and go as far as they deem away from hole.

Situations where a player has the option to drop from the position the ball was played from, examples are:

Re Teeing the ball when lost or deemed OB

Ball lost on course

Ball in Water Hazard

Club Rat

The first option in the USGA rules says that you can play from original spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Fourputt

Just for an example, look at this situation.  A player has a slippery 25 foot downhill putt to hole cut just 7 feet from the edge of the green.  He strike the ball a bit too hard and it cruises past the hole, over the fringe, down a slope and into a water hazard.  The drop a from the hazard would be on the far side of the water, leaving a 100 yard shot.  The player is still allowed to choose the option under rule 26-1a and play again from the previous spot, with a one stroke penalty, even though that is much closer to the hole.  The same is true when proceeding under Rule 28 for an unplayable lie, and it's always up to the player to determine this.  He can declare a ball unplayable at any place on the course outside of a water hazard.  The stroke and distance option is actually the first option listed in the procedure (Rule 28a).  When the ball lies unplayable in a water hazard, then you are required to proceed under Rule 26-1, but the same option is offered under 26-1a.

Good example. Thanks.

I wish I would have known this a long time ago.  Their has been situations, none as bad as your example, but similar to that where I was close to the green chipping and bladed the shot into a bush or plugged it at the top of a bunker on the other side of the green. Knowing this rule probably would have saved me 1-2 shots on those holes. Usually when things go bad like that for me, I get into Phil mode. I think I can hit a plugged ball with a backwards flop shot out of a bunker. The only problem is, is that nothing in my game would justify me believing I could pull off a shot like that. So usually a bad hole turns into a joke of a hole and a lot of anger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Just for an example, look at this situation.  A player has a slippery 25 foot downhill putt to hole cut just 7 feet from the edge of the green.  He strike the ball a bit too hard and it cruises past the hole, over the fringe, down a slope and into a water hazard.  The drop a from the hazard would be on the far side of the water, leaving a 100 yard shot.  The player is still allowed to choose the option under rule 26-1a and play again from the previous spot, with a one stroke penalty, even though that is much closer to the hole.  The same is true when proceeding under Rule 28 for an unplayable lie, and it's always up to the player to determine this.  He can declare a ball unplayable at any place on the course outside of a water hazard.  The stroke and distance option is actually the first option listed in the procedure (Rule 28a).  When the ball lies unplayable in a water hazard, then you are required to proceed under Rule 26-1, but the same option is offered under 26-1a.

Good example. Thanks.

I wish I would have known this a long time ago.  Their has been situations, none as bad as your example, but similar to that where I was close to the green chipping and bladed the shot into a bush or plugged it at the top of a bunker on the other side of the green. Knowing this rule probably would have saved me 1-2 shots on those holes. Usually when things go bad like that for me, I get into Phil mode. I think I can hit a plugged ball with a backwards flop shot out of a bunker. The only problem is, is that nothing in my game would justify me believing I could pull off a shot like that. So usually a bad hole turns into a joke of a hole and a lot of anger.

I think we've all been there.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

I think we've all been there.

And that's also what happens periodically to players when a Rules situation comes up - they can get "tunnel vision" and don't give it enough thought.  One of the characteristics of a good rules official is that he looks into the player's eyes to see if the player is "there" and understanding the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just so the OP and others reading are clear on this. The ball does not have to be unplayable or in a hazard. R27-1a always allows you to play under stroke and distance. Rule 20-5 explains the procedure for doing it.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

A player has a slippery 25 foot downhill putt to hole cut just 7 feet from the edge of the green.  He strike the ball a bit too hard and it cruises past the hole, over the fringe, down a slope and into a water hazard.  The drop a from the hazard would be on the far side of the water, leaving a 100 yard shot.  The player is still allowed to choose the option under rule 26-1a and play again from the previous spot, with a one stroke penalty, even though that is much closer to the hole.

Tiger Woods did just that a couple of years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I will agree with above and a good rule too, I know myself with some particuar bunkers on courses that I play, if I go in and the ball is not in a perfect position, I will just replay the original shot that got me there. (bunker too deep, and my sand game too unreliable to guarentee getting out first time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In a bunker, the ball must be dropped within two club lengths without advancing the ball or directly back along the original line as far as desired without leaving the bunker, or re-hit from the original lie; all with a one-stroke penalty.

It doesn't matter where the original position was (even the putting green).  The only time a player may not declare his ball unplayable is from a water hazard (yellow stakes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by stangmark

In a bunker, the ball must be dropped within two club lengths without advancing the ball or directly back along the original line as far as desired without leaving the bunker, or re-hit from the original lie; all with a one-stroke penalty.

It doesn't matter where the original position was (even the putting green).  The only time a player may not declare his ball unplayable is from a water hazard (yellow stakes).

I was under the understanding that it's not the original line, but taking the line from the hole and your ball and going backwards in a straight line from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

Quote:

Originally Posted by stangmark

In a bunker, the ball must be dropped within two club lengths without advancing the ball or directly back along the original line as far as desired without leaving the bunker, or re-hit from the original lie; all with a one-stroke penalty.

It doesn't matter where the original position was (even the putting green).  The only time a player may not declare his ball unplayable is from a water hazard (yellow stakes).

I was under the understanding that it's not the original line, but taking the line from the hole and your ball and going backwards in a straight line from that.

Don't take anything stangmark says too seriously.  Judging from his efforts on a dozen or more threads last night, he has a very confused and confusing idea of what the rules actually say in most situations.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4116 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...