Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Direct Hazard Question

Conor

By Conor
in Rules of Golf

 Share
Note: This thread is 4767 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Conor Member

Conor

Posted
Posted

Me and my golf coach were talking today about a situation one of the players on our team got in involving a yellow staked, direct hazard.

The hole was a par 3, with water in front of the green and behind, both marked with yellow stakes. The player hit the ball into the hazard behind the green, or the one furthest out. They then weren't sure how this would be ruled and asked some coaches observing near by, and they didn't have a first clue. So they just re-teed and played it as if it went OB.

If that were me playing I think the correct way to play would be to drop the ball however far back I wanted, being a direct hazard, not lateral. But then, technically, I would be able to drop right on the green if I wanted too.

What would be the correct ruling on this scenario according to the USGA rules? It seems like it should be obvious, but it escapes me.


Golfingdad Incredible Member

Golfingdad

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted by Conor

Me and my golf coach were talking today about a situation one of the players on our team got in involving a yellow staked, direct hazard.

The hole was a par 3, with water in front of the green and behind, both marked with yellow stakes. The player hit the ball into the hazard behind the green, or the one furthest out. They then weren't sure how this would be ruled and asked some coaches observing near by, and they didn't have a first clue. So they just re-teed and played it as if it went OB.

If that were me playing I think the correct way to play would be to drop the ball however far back I wanted, being a direct hazard, not lateral. But then, technically, I would be able to drop right on the green if I wanted too.

What would be the correct ruling on this scenario according to the USGA rules? It seems like it should be obvious, but it escapes me.

The direct line doesn't go from where you entered a hazard towards where you hit from.  It goes from where you entered the hazard on a line through the hole - the other direction .  As in ... not nearer the hole than where it crossed into the water.  So, basically, he would have to go around to the other side of that hazard.

Re-teeing is ALWAYS an option, and in this case, without knowing more about the layout of the hole, was quite possibly the best option.

EDIT:  It's also possible a hole like this has a drop area somewhere, in which case that would be another option.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

MyrtleBeachGolf Great Member

MyrtleBeachGolf

Posted
Posted
I'm no rules expert, but it would seem odd to me that a water hazard behind the green is marked with yellow stakes. My understanding is that water hazards you must hit over on your way to the green are marked yellow. I would think a water hazard over the back of the green would be marked red (lateral hazard).
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Fourputt Incredible Member

Fourputt

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted by MyrtleBeachGolf

I'm no rules expert, but it would seem odd to me that a water hazard behind the green is marked with yellow stakes. My understanding is that water hazards you must hit over on your way to the green are marked yellow. I would think a water hazard over the back of the green would be marked red (lateral hazard).

Depends on the intent of the designer.  Think of the 17th at Sawgrass - yellow all the way around.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1

Conor Member

Conor

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I'm no rules expert, but it would seem odd to me that a water hazard behind the green is marked with yellow stakes. My understanding is that water hazards you must hit over on your way to the green are marked yellow. I would think a water hazard over the back of the green would be marked red (lateral hazard).

If it was marked lateral then how would you abide by the "two club lengths no closer to the hole" rule? I'd think you would have to go to the other side of the hazard but then your not playing on the point of entry. If a course has a hole setup like this then I think there should definently be a drop area, like Golfingdad said. As for Sawgrass, you'd think there'd be a drop area somewhere for those of us that would have to get lucky the 6th or 7th try haha.


MyrtleBeachGolf Great Member

MyrtleBeachGolf

Posted
Posted
If it was marked lateral then how would you abide by the "two club lengths no closer to the hole" rule? I'd think you would have to go to the other side of the hazard but then your not playing on the point of entry. If a course has a hole setup like this then I think there should definently be a drop area, like Golfingdad said. As for Sawgrass, you'd think there'd be a drop area somewhere for those of us that would have to get lucky the 6th or 7th try haha.

Without us being able to see the actual layout of the hole, it's just up to our imagination as to what it may look like, or how it's staked. There could very easily be a lateral hazard marked in red behind the green where you would be able to drop 2 club lengths from where the ball last crossed the margin of the hazard without going closer to the hole. It's possible to move left or right from the margin while actually moving further from the hole. Also, you can move back on a straight line as far back as you want. The line is formed from the hole to where the ball last crossed the margin of the hazard and extends forever.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Rulesman Great Member

Rulesman

Posted
Posted

We are told it was yellow staked behind the hole and that the ball went into that hazard.

The answer is staightforward.

Take a line from the hole, through the point that the ball last crossed the margin of that hazard and drop anywhere on that line on the opposite side of the hazard from the hole.

The only alternative is to play again from where the original stroke was made.


Rulesman Great Member

Rulesman

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted by MyrtleBeachGolf

I'm no rules expert, but it would seem odd to me that a water hazard behind the green is marked with yellow stakes. My understanding is that water hazards you must hit over on your way to the green are marked yellow. I would think a water hazard over the back of the green would be marked red (lateral hazard).

Lateral means parallel to the line of play, normally alongside the fairway.

A “ lateral water hazard ” is a water hazard or that part of a water hazard so situated that it is not possible, or is deemed by the Committee to be impracticable, to drop a ball behind the water hazard in accordance with Rule 26-Ib .


luu5 Dedicated Member

luu5

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted by Rulesman

Lateral means parallel to the line of play, normally alongside the fairway.

A “lateral water hazard” is a water hazard or that part of a water hazard so situated that it is not possible, or is deemed by the Committee to be impracticable, to drop a ball behind the water hazard in accordance with Rule 26-Ib.

In definitions it does not mention anything about being parallel, just not possible or impractical to go around (I know what word lateral means). Many times the water body behind the green is such that going around the WH is not very easy. Limiting playing to just one type of relief from WH is not very good design, imo.


Conor Member

Conor

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The picture is what the hole looks like, to a point. That ruleing makes sence, except on this hole it is a giant cliff behind the hazard haha. The course was made on an old iron ore mine, so it is rather hilly. I'd have to go back and check, but I'm pretty sure there isn't a drop area on the hole. Seems like a good idea though.

MyrtleBeachGolf Great Member

MyrtleBeachGolf

Posted
Posted
Lateral means parallel to the line of play, normally alongside the fairway. A “ lateral water hazard ” is a water hazard or that part of a water hazard so situated that it is not possible, or is deemed by the Committee to be impracticable, to drop a ball behind the water hazard in accordance with Rule 26-Ib .

Perfectly understood. My assumption was that behind the green was a water hazard of some sort. And beyond that hazard was a line of thick woods basically marking the end/edge of the hole. It turns out that there isn't woods, but a cliff that makes it impossible to drop behind the hazard that's over back of the green. Same idea. It seems it's not possible to drop behind the hazard. Which is exactly why I suggested it should be marked with red stakes, not yellow.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Fourputt Incredible Member

Fourputt

Posted
Posted
Originally Posted by MyrtleBeachGolf

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rulesman

Lateral means parallel to the line of play, normally alongside the fairway.

A “

lateral water hazard

” is a

water hazard

or that part of a

water hazard

so situated that it is not possible, or is deemed by the

Committee

to be impracticable, to drop a ball behind the

water hazard

in accordance with Rule

26-Ib

.

Perfectly understood. My assumption was that behind the green was a water hazard of some sort. And beyond that hazard was a line of thick woods basically marking the end/edge of the hole. It turns out that there isn't woods, but a cliff that makes it impossible to drop behind the hazard that's over back of the green. Same idea. It seems it's not possible to drop behind the hazard. Which is exactly why I suggested it should be marked with red stakes, not yellow.

I think a better solution would still be a dropping zone on the tee side of the pond if no reasonable spot exists on the far side.  There are times when there is no possibility of dropping 2 clublengths from the point where the ball last crossed the margin.  It all depends on the angle from the hole and the shape of the margin.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1

Note: This thread is 4767 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • RetiredOldMan
      Too Old?

      By RetiredOldMan · Posted

      StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • saevel25
      Brendan Sorsby Sports Betting

      By saevel25 · Posted

      So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • StuM
      Swing Thoughts & Mental Game

      By StuM · Posted

      The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • saevel25
      Swing Thoughts & Mental Game

      By saevel25 · Posted

      I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • coachjimsc
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By coachjimsc · Posted

      Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept