Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
  • entries
    57
  • comments
    772
  • views
    52,732

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

chris3putt

Posted

This is exactly my priority piece. Thanks for the blog!

Gator Hazard

Posted

I know that is a problem of mine, I can feel it sometimes. I especially do it hitting longer clubs off the deck and believe it is the main reason why I hit behind the ball or hit it fat. 

JonMA1

Posted

I thought about this blog as I've begun what seems to be my annual end-of-the-year, downward spiral. The repeating pattern includes an improvement in ball striking in the middle of the season with improvement lasting a couple of months, followed by a decline.

The most recent improvement with the driver and woods came as a result of a small change in the backswing. Simply keeping the takeaway long (remember the "straight trial arm" thread?) and hinging the wrists later and along the plane (don't know the correct term - radial deviation??)  instead of thinking about Hogan's supination lessons. The results were almost automatic... ball starts along target line with little to no curve. There was no need to compensate my alignment or club face. Whether off the tee or, in the case of fairway woods, off the deck - align everything and remember those two things - long arms, wrist hinge late and along the plane. Seemed easy to repeat and the results were like magic.

It was nice while it lasted.

If "small change big change" can apply towards success, I suppose the reverse can also be true. Obviously, there were so many other little things I must have doing (mostly) right. Maybe my slower tempo at first helped in the timing of my lower body, and once I started experiencing success my confidence grew and I starting swinging too fast, throwing off the timing??? Maybe over swinging??? There are so many possibilities I'm looking at as to why good results are no longer automatic. Point is, I don't think it takes much to screw it up.

Whatever the cause, I suppose this is an endorsement for instruction - or at least for recording the swing when it's good. That way, it might be easier to identify the subtle change when it isn't.

CarlSpackler

Posted

This is something that plaques many many golf swings. It's like a mega-virus that the CDC won't address.

chspeed

Posted (edited)

1 hour ago, JonMA1 said:

Whatever the cause, I suppose this is an endorsement for instruction - or at least for recording the swing when it's good. That way, it might be easier to identify the subtle change when it isn't.

Bingo. And of learning how to use video to see if any of your priorities that you've fixed (whether it's steady head, backswing length, etc.) need revisiting.

Edited by chspeed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • The lie angle is the lie angle. It may "play" effectively upright or flat, but the angle is the angle.
    • Thinking about the GEARS Curve thread.  I know I am going through a bit of a swing change here. I was looking at some of the lie data from GEARS and remembering the QUAD data from Sunday. On most decent swings, I think I am going to be around 1-2 degrees toe down.  I can get major toe up if I do the downswing piece wrong, over-bend elbow in the downswing, and use the body. For the most part, I am definitely in that 1-2 degree toe down.  I just had my lie angles checked for my 4 iron (61.5 deg), 7 iron (62.5 deg), PW (65 deg). Which is what I ordered, on the number. So, at least Sub70 golf does a good job hitting lie angle numbers. 😁 Though, I did order +1/2" length, which I read makes the club one more degree toe up. So, my 7 iron might be closer to 63.5 degrees. Which probably makes my ideal lie angle closer to 64.5 degrees for a 7 iron.  Which also matches close to the Ping web fitting when I plug in my height and arm length. I am a 1/2" length and +3 upright.     
    • I saw that. That was awesome. 
    • Yes, I've wondered the same thing about breaking pitches, whether they're sinking or whether they're curving horizontally. If you consider that the plate is a rectangular prism (ignoring the back triangle), a ball could break in over the back corner or clip the front corner before continuing to curve farther away from the strike zone. Both pitches could miss the middle of the plate "planar" (2D) rectangle. I don't think it's anywhere near 6". A ball would have to be moving at a 35° angle to drop 6" over 8.5". That feels like an awfully steep angle. A quick search says a breaking ball moves only 6-12" vertically, and I'm not even sure if that's including the normal drop from gravity. Then of course I remembered this: /site-core/images/statcast-logo-2025.png Statcast Pitch Movement Leaderboard | baseballsavant.com Baseball Savant 6" over 8.5" would be a TON. Basically unheard of. Unless it's an eephus pitch. 😉  No, either way, it shrinks the zone. Whether a ball clips the front of the plate before falling out, or clips the back top of the plate as it drops… it's gonna miss the middle plane of the plate. ABS has given us things like this, though, which are great:
    • Day 22 (30 Mar 26) - Worked with the local Christian academy golf team today in their practice session at the course.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.