Jump to content
  • entries
    2
  • comments
    14
  • views
    4,054

Big Lex

2,672 views

I took up golf when I was 23. I had played some rounds at a pitch and putt as a kid, but I didn't really get hooked on the game until I was already finished with college and engaged in post-graduate studies. It seemed I was always scrounging for time to play. Like most of us, I was hooked quickly and wanted to be a good golfer - a scratch. That made it seem like I needed even MORE time. 

In his autobiography, Jack Nicklaus describes his early to mid-teen years as a virtual gluttony of golf: entire summer days, dawn to dusk, spent at the course....hours hitting practice balls...anywhere from 36 to 63 (yup, he once played sixty-three in one day!) holes, late day short game and putting practice, etc. He says his family never took vacations, and that in those early years, he doubts if he missed more than a day or two per summer of this routine, apart from weather related interruptions. And he did it all on a top-ranked golf course (Scioto CC in Columbus), under the tutelage of an accomplished PGA pro (Jack Grout).

Did he become great because he spent all that time learning the game - simple repetition-based learning - or was it something else? Malcolm Gladwell would place Nicklaus firmly in his category of people who achieve greatness because of special opportunity: How many people have the opportunity to practice golf so much, at so young an age, on such a great golf course, with the financial resources to supplement it with teaching? Not many.

Yet how many people, given those opportunities, would have done as Jack did? For a teenager to pursue ONE activity, to the exclusion of all else, for ONE day? Sure...just about any kid can do that. For a week? A few would drop out. A month, or an entire summer? I'm sure we would be in single-digit percentages at this point, if not lower. 

Golf is a great game, maybe the greatest of all, because it challenges us in so many ways. What is the greatest challenge? Is it to have enough time? Or is it how to use the time we have?

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

This ones about as deep as my avatar!

The question seems to be (1) Quantity vs Quality and maybe there's even a little (2) how good do you want to get to be? question in there too.

Let me address the latter first. These people like you see on TV, no matter what sport, are super human. For the rest of us normal people, who today can't throw a ball 95mph, can't run a sub 4 minute mile, and can't drive a golf ball 325 yards.......it's likely we never will no matter how technically perfect we become. When you first crack the book to learn how to become a PGA teaching professional one of the first things that it says is that "people have physical limitations". It's those with all the right combinations of skills, opportunity, and desire that actually get to reach the levels of professional and even then it's not easy for most of them. Some people have the skills but they lack the desire, some have the desire but they lack the opportunity. Some even have all three but can't seem to get them in the right combination. So how does one get to become one of the lucky less than 1% of the people that become professionals in their sport? Well, I'm not saying don't try, but make sure you have a backup plan. And me? I want to get to be as good at golf as I can be, as good as I can afford to be, but without shirking my other responsibilities to family and friends. How good my game is is personal between me and myself and if along the way it allows me to get some minor recognition for my accomplishments at it, that's even better...... but I ain't quitting my day job if ya know what I mean. 

As far as Quality versus Quantity, that is a really good question. Balance I think is my answer but I think everyone's balance is what they deem right for them. I try to play good golf as much as I can, but I realize that just doesn't mean going out and playing golf. Practice and Training have a lot to do with good golf and I agree  it's hard to find the time.

I think the key is being happy with what you are able to invest in trying. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
  • Administrator

Simple answer: it's not just quantity, but the quality of that quantity, plus a dash of "natural talent level" thrown in to boot.

Link to comment

"Golf is a great game, maybe the greatest of all, because it challenges us in so many ways." It also is a passion, one which affects everyone in different manners but similar to most.

What is the greatest challenge? There are many, the expense, the travel, the schedule, family, friends, health, etc.

Is it to have enough time? Generally, most will make time for any desire in life, or make plans.

Or is it how to use the time we have? I think most enjoy the opportunity when they can.

Yet how many people, given those opportunities, would have done as Jack did? Many may have the same dream, but everyone has their own journey.

I agree with iacas  "it's not just quantity, but the quality of that quantity"

Club Rat

Link to comment

I think if it were about having the time we would see far more people with III IV and such after their names dominating the game with family money spent at the country club golf courses.  How many of these rich kids that have every resource available and grow up on a golf course are out there doing what Jack and Tiger did (and yes I know there are a few but even they are the exception)?  As iacas has said it also has to do with the quality of the quantity and also just athletic ability in my opinion.  I had a friend who practically picked up a pool cue and just knew how to play, he was truly a natural.  Not everyone is like that and not everyone is as good no matter how much time they put in or if they have the same instructor(s).

Edited by Gator Hazard
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...