Jump to content
  • entries
    18
  • comments
    223
  • views
    10,019

The Golf Gods Suck


JonMA1

6,994 views

I finally got around to playing 18 holes of golf with only 4 clubs this morning -  something I've wanted to do since early in the season. My goal was to keep the score to within 5 of my average. The 4 hybrid and 9i were shoo-ins. The 4h because I seem to hit it well, and the 9i because I can use for a short bump-and-run all the way up to a 130 yard full swing. I then had to decide on two more. I decided to bench my gap wedge, which is the go-to club from 100 yards and in, and go with the sand wedge instead. The reason being too much roll on short sided flag locations seem to be costing me strokes. Perhaps forcing myself to use a more lofted wedge would be beneficial.

Last, I decided to go with the putter and disregard @boogielicious' advice to learn to putt with a wedge instead. This would have allowed another option for the full swing. I have to admit there was little chance the putter would be left behind. It's not that I'm at all good with the putter, but it's used from off the green a lot and it's better than trying to putt with any other club. That would turn out to be far from the truth.

The first 9

The first two holes were pretty typical, a couple of bogeys that resulted from less than perfect tee shots. Still, I felt pretty good about how the round was going. Then came the par 5 3rd.

Two beautiful 4-hybrid shots left me with a short approach of around 90 yards. Time to test the SW on a shot I'd have used the GW for all-day-long. Good contact, high, and right at the flag, 2 putt for par.

Nice, I thought. Not a bad start and everything felt good. Next up were three par 4's in a row followed by a par 5. The hybrid felt really good off the tee and whenever I needed less than a full swing, the club responded very well as did the SW and the 9i. I would hit GIR's on those next four holes. My full swing and partial swings were golden. 

But the golf gods giveth and they taketh.

The first par 4 had a pin location to the front of a very fast downhill green and my partial hybrid approach had found the back. To be honest, I was ok with the 3-putt bogey in this situation. Besides, the way I was striking the ball, I'd make up for it with subsequent pars.

The pin location on the next par 4 was uphill with my SW approach landing about 25 feet below. The lag putt can only be politely described as wimpy. It wasn't a poor read, or a bad bead, I just didn't get anywhere near the speed I knew was needed to get it close. 3-putt number 2.

Despite temps in the 30's, I was starting to get warm under the collar. It was hard to enjoy one of my best ball striking rounds when I couldn't close the deal. But c'mon, that was only two holes. Surely the putting would get back on track.

The next par 4 included a beautiful partial hybrid, a flighted 9 iron below the pin... and three more putts including a miss from 18".

In all fairness, I shouldn't have hit the green on the next par 5. The 4h approach to the green started a bit right, but a tree branch deflected it to the green. There was no way the golf gods were going to let this bit of luck remain unpunished. Hence, a nice 4-putt and my first double of the day. 

https://www.gamegolf.com/player/JonMa1/round/2425607

The second 9

Instead of describing each of the next 9 holes, I'll only say that the golf gods had a hard-on for me today. Sure, they'd allowed decent putting this second time through the 9 hole course, but as if to say "you didn't think we were just going to give good putting back to you" they made sure to take away the good ball striking. The hole where I got my only par on first 9 resulted in a 10 the second time through. The comedy of errors leading to that wonderful score included playing bloody knuckles (literally) with two oak trees when I tried to punch out an errant 4 hybrid shot from between them.

https://www.gamegolf.com/player/JonMa1/round/2425761

Eat $#!^ and die, golf gods!


As for the four-club "challenge", it should have been more fun than it was, but that's on me. There were positives...

• My goal was to keep the score within 5 of my average and I kept it to within 1. 

• I not only hit the ball solidly on most shots, I was able to adjust and control distance, and even shape a couple of shots.

• In many situations, the SW is a better club than the GW around the green.

• The 7 GIRs is the highest I've had in some time - and there were several nGIR as well.

• The round didn't cause me to putt more poorly than usual, the GIRs only exposed my poor putting. High GIR = more putts unless you're good at both.

This round also backed up what I believe to be true. Using a safer, shorter club off the tee doesn't guarantee a better score for everyone. I hit 71% of my fairways today, did not get any penalties, and still failed to break 95.

Instead of leaving the driver at home, maybe I should become as skilled with that club as I am with the 4 hybrid.

11 Comments


Recommended Comments

Vinsk

Posted

Nice. Always good to give the Golf Gods a little something to chew on now and then. I would think putting with your 4h would be easier than with a wedge. I’d ditch the putter for another off green option. 

  • Administrator
iacas

Posted

Reversion to the mean? (Not trying to be mean - seriously asking.)

dennyjones

Posted

Always said, "Don't tempt the Golf Gods,   they taketh and usually don't share"

Vinsk

Posted

Sometimes you gotta dance with the devil in the pale moonlight.

JonMA1

Posted

34 minutes ago, iacas said:

Reversion to the mean? (Not trying to be mean - seriously asking.)

Of course it was. You know all but the last few lines of the entry was tongue-in-cheek, right?

I feel I have a good handle on the reality of my game... if that's what you're asking. I'm happy when any part of it happens to be better than average in a given round but, at the same time, try to recognize it for what it really is.

The two GIR's on the 2nd time through was at my average of four per 18.

  • Moderator
boogielicious

Posted

There are a lot of variables when it’s that cold out. I think you had a great round all things considered and it sounded like a lot of fun.

  • Upvote 1
Piz

Posted

The golf gods are the same drunken wastrels as the rest of the lot.  Why would you expect them to behave any differently?

JonMA1

Posted

13 hours ago, boogielicious said:

There are a lot of variables when it’s that cold out. I think you had a great round all things considered and it sounded like a lot of fun.

I played better than I expected to. It’s been a long time since I’ve had that kind of control over the full swing - even it was just for 9 holes. So besides the bit of frustration, yes it was fun and I’ll likely do it again.

Almost as important as the enjoyment was that I discovered some weaknesses and strengths in my game... which is never a bad thing.

*Regarding the cold, I literally had the entire course to myself for almost 4 hours.

bkuehn1952

Posted

Nice narrative.  Thanks.

While we are on the subject of late or off-season golf, have you ever tried a personal 2-ball scramble?  You play 2 balls off the tee.  Select the best.  Hit twice more from the spot of your best drive.  Proceed that way through the 9 or 18 holes, including on the green.  You might be surprised by the positive results.  I think it offers a glimpse at one's potential.

Lihu

Posted

21 hours ago, bkuehn1952 said:

Nice narrative.  Thanks.

While we are on the subject of late or off-season golf, have you ever tried a personal 2-ball scramble?  You play 2 balls off the tee.  Select the best.  Hit twice more from the spot of your best drive.  Proceed that way through the 9 or 18 holes, including on the green.  You might be surprised by the positive results.  I think it offers a glimpse at one's potential.

What do you mean? We’re just starting my golf season...🤪🤪😂

Seriously, @JonMA1, sounds like your long game is coming along really well! 7 GIR? Nice!

ChetlovesMer

Posted

All things considered, You played great. A wise man told me you can only control what you can control. Once the ball is on it's way you did your part. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Popular Now

  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Yea, but a deeper face makes it not as useful off the fairway. This is why the driver is not easy to hit off the fairway.  For a select few PGA Tour players, it might be good. The concept of the mini driver has been around for a long time now. Very few ever keep it in their bag. This is a guess, but probably because it sucks off the ground. Nothing here looks like it is any different than the other mini drivers of the past.  I get it from Cameron Young and Will Zalatoris point of view. They hit the ball a long way. The odds they ever hit a 3-wood off the turf is like what, a handful a times a year? They probably would hit it 98% off the tee and 2% off the ground. They probably want something that think is longer off the tee versus their 3-wood because they don't hit the 3-wood off the ground much at all.  This is where I say, Titleist claiming "worked as a go-to club off the tee and off the deck." is more marketing than something that is actually beneficial to a golfer. This is primarily for off the tee.   
    • One thing I've noticed with Mini Drivers is that the manufacturers seem like they keep their quantities somewhat limited.  The last two TaylorMade Mini's and the Callaway AI Smoke Mini were sold out quickly. 
    • Huh? That's the niche of these mini-drivers. They can still work off the tee and off the fairway. They're designed for and work for both things, which is all that blurb says. You can see from the photos that it's a bit of a deeper face, which I find is more important off the tee than the fairway.
    • This statement doesn't make much sense to me.  So, I think the push and pull between a 3-wood meant for off the turf versus off the tee is how tall the face is on the 3-wood. I do not get how this mini driver would be good off the turf, or at least get the height needed to stop the ball as a normal 3-wood meant for off the ground. Maybe they care more about hitting the 3-wood off the tee versus off the turf. Nearly every strike would be low on the clubface relative to the CG location.  I would take that statement as more as marketing over what you would actually expect the club to perform.   
    • No, not that Minnie Driver. This one: It's a mini driver from Titleist, available for Tour validation/testing starting this week at Kapalua. It's available in righty and lefty and is only in 13° models for now. GT280 is a direct result of Titleist’s collaboration with PGA TOUR players on the development and testing of the TSR 2W prototype, which debuted on TOUR at last year’s PLAYERS Championship. With many players seeking an additional option at the top end of their setup, Titleist tour reps and R&D engineers worked with players such as Cameron Young and Will Zalatoris to dial in a 13-degree head that worked as a go-to club off the tee and off the deck. Now on Tour: New Titleist GT280 The arrival of the 2025 PGA TOUR season this week in Maui brings with it an addition to Titleist’s breakthrough line of GT metalwoods: the new Titleist GT280.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...