Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2340 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
12 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Not to get confused with the earlier discussion about men's soccer v. women's soccer overall, but as far as the US sides go, comparing the USMNT and USWNT is kind of silly.

The U.S. has been in the forefront of competitive women's soccer. Keep in mind the first FIFA Women's World Cup occurred in 1991, so it hasn't exactly been a long history. With its jump, the US has a deeper talent pool and the best programs to develop that talent.

US men's soccer, by contrast, was decades behind the rest of the world when people started getting somewhat serious about it in the 1990s. I'm not altogether sure I saw a match until the 1993 World Cup. In any case, top male athletes generally don't play the sport in the US and the programs to develop the talent aren't there yet.

I'm really not sure how they can be considered arrogant. Given the recent run of form, they appear rather the opposite to me.

Arrogant in that they go rogue when they play and don't follow the game plan. Too much individual deviation and trying to win it by themselves. Maybe selfish is a better term. 

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
33 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

oo much individual deviation and trying to win it by themselves.

Yep. I agree somewhat with arrogant in that they’re not very talented but think they are. Altidore is awful. He’s fast but has no boot. Brazil gets out there and peppers the goal with shot after shot. Obviously you have to have a well formed defense but without an aggressive offense with talented strikers you’ll just be good at losing by small margins what is exactly what the USMNT has done for years. Times they’ve been up 1-0 and what did they do? Shut down the offense and piddle around in the Midfield while getting relentlessly drilled with shots from teams that go for broke only to lose 1-3 and think they played a sound game. It’s maddening. 

  • Like 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2340 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
    • I have access to far more data (including surveys and polls) than you do with your anecdotes. I mean this as plainly and literally as possible: you’ve demonstrated that you do not. They would, one way or the other.
    • Yes, but you don't live in the UK, so you have no idea what we think about it here. It's a very different mindset here, to demonstrate the fact you should consider 9 out of 10 games we play here are Stableford, whereas you you almost solely play medal. Neither is right or wrong, it's just different  I'm trying to avoid swearing here. Once again, and for the 1000th time, I understand the system, I just don't agree with it. Is there anything wrong with that? PS, I do not have the time or patience to post my results, especially as they prove nothing  That's because 99% of the posters are Yanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.