Jump to content
IGNORED

Rule of 12 and Changing Lofts


Note: This thread is 1134 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I am not an equipment aficionado from a knowledge standpoint. I play game improvement clubs...I think they are Mi5 or Mi6 (or a mix, I think the irons are one of those and the woods/driver are another)..but I don't actually know what brand they are. Those things just don't fall in my interest realm... tested several, got fitted for them, liked them,  bought them, I use them, like them, they do well for me...that is as far as thinking about clubs go.

 

I also tend to use the rule of 12. I don't have the time (or inclination) to spend hours a week dialing in my clubs enough to use the "one club around the green for all situations" approach...but keeping one simple chipping technique and the rule of 12 tends to give me "good enough" results...I can typically get on the green, usually in reasonable range and occasionally in the awesome 3' radius I strive for. 

But for reasons that elude me, I started wondering...it is my understanding that manufacturers have been changing lofts on clubs significantly. I don't actually know the loft on my clubs (other than the ones stamped 50, 55 and 60 of course...those I know). 

So if the rule of 12 is predicated on the lofts, it is entirely possible i have been selecting the wrong club for the ratio. But i am not sure where to look to find out.

 

Anyone know if I should alter my club selection based on the new lofts? or is that a dumb question?

 

appreciate it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
15 hours ago, darthweasel said:

I also tend to use the rule of 12. I don't have the time (or inclination) to spend hours a week dialing in my clubs enough to use the "one club around the green for all situations" approach...but keeping one simple chipping technique and the rule of 12 tends to give me "good enough" results...I can typically get on the green, usually in reasonable range and occasionally in the awesome 3' radius I strive for. 

......

Anyone know if I should alter my club selection based on the new lofts? or is that a dumb question?

It seems to me that the results are what matters.  If your chipping is generally good enough, why would you change it?  If you were consistently long, as a result of the trend towards stronger lofts, you'd probably notice.  

  • Thumbs Up 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

It seems to me that the results are what matters.  If your chipping is generally good enough, why would you change it?  If you were consistently long, as a result of the trend towards stronger lofts, you'd probably notice.  

I feel like one of the easily improvable areas of my game with limited practice would be things that don't require swing work. Played league last night (two man scramble event) and due to life getting in the way, had not touched the clubs for a week. That means no chance to work on tweaks to say...my driver swing which has been a weakness lately and I very much know I need to spend a serious amount of time at the range doing the 5 P practice.

Same with my wedges...the chunking struck twice last night and on a completely unrelated note two easy pars turned into disappointing bogeys. But that takes time at the range.

 

But something like chipping with basic motion if I can knock a stroke a round off by better math would be cool, I just didn't know if the rule had changed.

 

Hopefully things get better soon and I can get back out to the range and short game areas to have actual mechanical improvement...I feel like that is the true path to improvement but also looking for little edges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I believe that the Rule of 12 used to be the Rule of 11.  This meant that before, you expected to get a 1:1 fly to roll ratio with a "10 iron (11-1) or a pitching wedge.  Lofts today are about a club strong (more or less), so it became the rule of 12, where 1:1 would be an "11 iron" or a gap wedge (or approach wedge, or whatever the manufacturer want to call it.  After that, the rule works, as the relative lofts between clubs are the same (or close enough for this purpose) as they were before.  If you need to roll less that you fly, you can go to more lofted clubs, obviously the "rule" doesn't directly work, at some point you have to "feel" it!

In any case, the "rule" is just a starting point.  Depending on how you chip (deloft, etc.), the rule might be 9, or 13.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1134 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I think if I could hit a 2nd shot when I did not like the result from the 1st I am sure I would get some lower scores.  I guess the idea is to mentally put yourself in a position where you need to make a really great shot, not just a good shot.  For example, hitting from the lie next to the creek his 1st chip was, in my view, pretty good but it was not "Great" in his opinion so he tried to do better on the mulligan, but he failed and was farther from the hole. I see myself doing this more on the range.  For example, after a period of practice I will mentally say I need to hit 4 good shots in a row.  I start with a Driver and if that is good then I do a 3 Hybrid followed by a pitch with a wedge and finally by a short chip.  If any shot is "Bad" I have to start over.      
    • That’s how I interpreted it. You’re giving yourself two mulligans on every shot. Yea it’s just a variation of getting used to scoring low. I’m curious how valuable that practice is. I guess for some people they feel mounting pressure from playing a string of holes well? I’m kind of the complete opposite TBH. Once I start putting together good holes, I get a little swagger and if anything I get overconfident. I start thinking I can hit the green from anywhere, I can hit my driver to the smallest of targets, and everything inside of 10’ is going in. None of that is true, of course, and I inevitably will hit a miss that brings me back down to earth.
    • Wordle 1,055 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I saw this video yesterday, couldn't figure out what he meant, then saw this thread and thought "oh maybe someone knows what he was talking about" and you guys are in the same place as me.  I *think* what he's suggesting is that you play a game such that going low is expected. He said there are different variations of it. I think his variation is you get three goes at a shot. You hit your first shot and it's good enough, then you just take it. If it's not good enough then you can abandon that shot and play another. If you still don't like it, you can hit it a third time, but then you're stuck with it. He's good enough that three goes at a shot ought to give him one that's good enough to move on. He did mention his parameters for what counts as "good enough", although I do note that he should have hit a third go on that pitch from the hazard based on that. He holed the putt though so it worked out in the end. I think if you're not as good as he is (which let's face it is everyone here and virtually everyone on the planet), then you'd adjust those rules to make it such that you might manage to make 5 birdies in a row. So maybe you play a two ball scramble with yourself and if you don't like either one then you can abandon those and hit a third or you play a three ball scramble or whatever it is that you need to make your standard work.  At its base though, it's just like going out and playing from the front tees or playing a scramble with yourself. The goal is to gain comfort with making lots of birdies and going way under par, so that when you find yourself in that situation in a real game, you don't panic. It's an interesting variation and if I ever got to play "for fun" at my home course, then I'd definitely try it.
    • Timing yes, feeling maybe not exactly 😉 Weight shift forward can start as early as A3. Weight shift is a lateral sway.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...