Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Cink DQ'd - crazy rule


Note: This thread is 6495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Apparently his ball was laying next to a bunker and he stood in the bunker to play the shot. His next shot landed in another bunker. He then proceeded to rake the bunker he had stood in and go to his ball to play the greenside bunker shot.

Well... later he and Zach Johnson were talking about wierd rules and Zach pointed this one out regarding testing conditions of a hazard 13-4. Cink then thought back and remembered doing this yesterday, problem was he had already signed his card. Result... Cink DQ'd. Many players said they do this on a regular basis without thinking about it.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
Apparently his ball was laying next to a bunker and he stood in the bunker to play the shot. His next shot landed in another bunker. He then proceeded to rake the bunker he had stood in and go to his ball to play the greenside bunker shot.

WOW that makes me sick...Stewart Cink was doing a nice thing by raking the bunker so his caddy would not have to

"People think the size of the head is most important. Wrong. It's getting a quality shaft. test different shafts to see which goes the straightest. Also, more degrees of loft on the head is better than less. Eleven degrees is about right."


Posted
Ya i still dont fully understand what he actually got DQ'd for?

That is rediculous.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
Ya i still dont fully understand what he actually got DQ'd for?

he got DQ'd because 13-4

13-4. Ball in Hazard; Prohibited Actions Except as provided in the Rules, before making a stroke at a ball that is in a hazard (whether a bunker or a water hazard) or that, having been lifted from a hazard, may be dropped or placed in the hazard, the player must not: a. Test the condition of the hazard or any similar hazard; b. Touch the ground in the hazard or water in the water hazard with his hand or a club; or c. Touch or move a loose impediment lying in or touching the hazard. Exceptions: 1. Provided nothing is done that constitutes testing the condition of the hazard or improves the lie of the ball, there is no penalty if the player (a) touches the ground or loose impediments in any hazard or water in a water hazard as a result of or to prevent falling, in removing an obstruction, in measuring or in marking the position of, retrieving, lifting, placing or replacing a ball under any Rule or (b) places his clubs in a hazard. 2. After making the stroke, if the ball is still in the hazard or has been lifted from the hazard and may be dropped or placed in the hazard, the player may smooth sand or soil in the hazard, provided nothing is done to breach Rule 13-2 with respect to his next stroke. If the ball is outside Rule 14 47 the hazard after the stroke, the player may smooth sand or soil in the hazard without restriction. 3. If the player makes a stroke from a hazard and the ball comes to rest in another hazard, Rule 13-4a does not apply to any subsequent actions taken in the hazard from which the stroke was made . the problem is... Cink was never in the hazard the first time... he merely stood in it. Therefore, raking would fall under 13-4(a) testing conditions. If he had played the ball from one bunker to the next it would be OK, but since his ball was never in the first bunker, he could not test the conditions of such. There should probably be an exception, but there is not at this time, so he is basically going to be the guinea pig.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
^ Ah, I understand. I was forgetting that the ball was not originally in the hazard.

Exception 3 makes sense if the ball was originally in the hazard. The stroke from the hazard gives the player information about the condition of the hazard and 13-4a is moot at that point.

Posted
Well... later he and Zach Johnson were talking about wierd rules and Zach pointed this one out regarding testing conditions of a hazard 13-4. Cink then thought back and remembered doing this yesterday, problem was he had already signed his card. Result... Cink DQ'd. Many players said they do this on a regular basis without thinking about it.

The rule makes sense, especially since going from a fairway bunker to a greenside bunker is a different shot. You want solid contact out of a fairway bunker if the lip is low enough. You rarely, if ever, want solid contact out of a greenside bunker. As such, knowing the consistency of the greenside bunker because of where your tee shot landed would be an advantage over hitting the fairway.

I'm not saying this is what Cink intended; in fact, I am 100% certain that this was an honest mistake. Props to him for calling the DQ, although once the situation was known, even if it was known only to Cink, there's no doubt that he would've called the DQ. Edit : Oops! I mis-read what happened and the rule in question. I thought he was in the bunker. In retrospect, I need to learn to read. Please disregard. Thanks.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That is a rule that should be altered. A person shouldn't have to back peddle from one bunker to the next in order to rake where they first hit. As a competitive junior I never saw anyone not rake the bunker just because they hit it into another one. You are not testing the conditions at that point (you already hit a shot so you know how they feel without raking).. the raking is proper etiquete and that rule definitely needs to be adjusted.

Titleist 913 D3 10.5*

Adams Super XTD 17*

Adams DHY 21*

TaylorMade TP MB 4-PW

Titleist SM4 54*/58*/62*

Bettinardi SS 11

Leupold GX-3i Rangefinder

Titleist ProV1 Ball


Posted
That is a rule that should be altered. A person shouldn't have to back peddle from one bunker to the next in order to rake where they first hit. As a competitive junior I never saw anyone not rake the bunker just because they hit it into another one. You are not testing the conditions at that point (you already hit a shot so you know how they feel without raking).. the raking is proper etiquete and that rule definitely needs to be adjusted.

You CAN rake if you HIT out of the first hazard... just NOT if you only STOOD in the first hazard. But, the rule should probably still be altered.

My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
what's the difference between hitting out of and standing in? I know that if I stand in the trap I get a good feel for the sand but when I hit a ball out of it after standing off to the side on the grass I still get excellent feedback of how the sand is.

Titleist 913 D3 10.5*

Adams Super XTD 17*

Adams DHY 21*

TaylorMade TP MB 4-PW

Titleist SM4 54*/58*/62*

Bettinardi SS 11

Leupold GX-3i Rangefinder

Titleist ProV1 Ball


Posted
Can you use a foot to smooth over footprints in this case? Seems reasonable since your feet were already in the bunker anyway.

Posted
what's the difference between hitting out of and standing in? I know that if I stand in the trap I get a good feel for the sand but when I hit a ball out of it after standing off to the side on the grass I still get excellent feedback of how the sand is.

again that's not the issue.... he was standing in the sand playing a ball that was NOT in the sand. Therefore his ball was never in the first hazard and therefore didn't meet the criteria for the exception. I agree that in any of those situations you get a feel for the sand, and THAT is why the rule should be ammended to include

anytime you hit from or take a stance in the first hazard .
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
So does that mean if you standing in a fairway bunker hitting a ball outside of the bunker and you hit in a green side bunker that you can't rake the fairway bunker until you hit out of the green side bunker?

edit: TV just answered my own question, the above is exactly what happened to Cink. Crazy Rule
My Bag

Driver: Sumo 460 10.5º Stiff
4 & 7 Woods: T-40 Stiff
Irons: Tight Lies GT 3-PWWedges: Tom Watson SignaturePutter: Daiwa DG-245Ball: One PlatinumGone Golfin'

Posted
A silly rule, but another example of why golf is so unique. He calls it on himself and gets D.Q. When I play other sports, guys are doing everything to get something by the refs or umpires. Golf, you police yourself. This is one that should be changed though.

Ping G 410 10.5 ˚ Driver Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 14.5˚ 3 Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 19˚ Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
i 500 irons 4-UW 1/2 inch over, blue dot, NS Pro Modus 105 Stiff Shafts
Ping Stealth Wedges Wedges  54˚ 58˚

Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 34" 


Posted
A silly rule, but another example of why golf is so unique. He calls it on himself and gets D.Q. When I play other sports, guys are doing everything to get something by the refs or umpires. Golf, you police yourself. This is one that should be changed though.

Great Point--i dont know any other sports where a guy would own up to a penalty--lets give credit to Stewart Cink--he did what a gentleman would do--and he forfeited his paycheck

"People think the size of the head is most important. Wrong. It's getting a quality shaft. test different shafts to see which goes the straightest. Also, more degrees of loft on the head is better than less. Eleven degrees is about right."


Posted
With 1.5 million this year he can't be too dissapointed, but he has got to be feeling a little run down with coming up just short of a win in some big events lately and now a DQ.
My Bag

Driver: Sumo 460 10.5º Stiff
4 & 7 Woods: T-40 Stiff
Irons: Tight Lies GT 3-PWWedges: Tom Watson SignaturePutter: Daiwa DG-245Ball: One PlatinumGone Golfin'

Posted
So it's ok for the caddy to rack and not the player?

No, the caddy can't rake either. As weird as it may sound, the caddy is considered "part of your equipment". Because of this, him raking the bunker is the same as you raking the bunker.

My dad is a rules official, and his best friend has been doing it for a long time. My dad's friend said that the rule was just recently added, but word is that the rule will be either altered or gotten rid of in two years when rules are up for alteration again.

Monster Tour 10.5* w/ Redboard 63
FP400f 14.5* w/ GD YSQ
Idea Pro 18* w/ VS Proto 80s
MP FLi-Hi 21 w/ S300
CG1 BP w/ PX 6.0 SM 54.11 SM 60.08 Sophia 33"


Posted
It seems as though that just be standing in the bunker, he would be testing the conditions of the hazard. This still does not make sense to me.
Drive for show, putt for dough


PutterKarsten Anser2
WedgesX-Forged 52* 58*IronsX-20 tours P-3HybridX 21 stiff4-wood R9 17 mitsubishi rayon fubuki StiffDriver R9 11.5 mitsubishi rayon fubuki Stiff

Note: This thread is 6495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.