Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1091 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

I have 61 swings (29 drivers, 32 irons (two of which are wedges) with full club and body data of men and women Tour players (or former Tour players) in my GEARS system. I've put some of the data from all of them in a spreadsheet and with that, I can plot a number of things against each other. I'm open to soliciting and creating charts that show you any of the data.

In each of these topics, I'll present the data in a chart of some kind and share the data in the quartiles (min, 25th, average, 75th, max) as well as the standard deviation.

Here's the chart for a selection of the better players in the database with irons:

axis_tilt_irons.jpg

Here's the chart for a selection of the better players in the database with drivers:

axis_tilt_drivers.jpg

The plots above shows the axis tilt of the "virtual spine" (center of shoulders through center of pelvis) as viewed from face-on. 90° is vertical, < 90° is leaning toward the target like / for a righty, > 90° is tilting away from the target like \ for a righty.

The charts below show the independent min, max, quartiles, etc. at each position.

Irons

                A1      A2      A3      A4      A5      A6      A7      A8
Low            87.7    84.7    81.0    80.7    84.0    91.9    94.5    98.0
25th           90.2    88.6    86.1    86.3    88.2    96.8   100.4   104.8
Average        92.0    91.8    90.6    90.2    91.9    99.2   102.7   107.1
75th           93.5    93.7    93.1    93.3    95.6   101.4   105.5   110.1
High           98.4   101.0   101.7   100.7   101.5   106.9   112.6   117.5
Range          10.7    16.3    20.7    20.0    17.5    15.0    18.1    19.5
Std. Dev.       2.8     5.0     6.3     5.9     5.1     4.1     4.4     4.9

Drivers

                A1      A2      A3      A4      A5      A6      A7      A8
Low            88.9    88.0    84.4    82.7    86.4    97.4    102.9   106.7
25th           91.9    90.8    89.8    92.6    93.5   100.1    105.0   110.4
Average        93.6    94.3    93.8    94.6    94.7   102.7    108.1   113.4
75th           95.9    99.0    97.8    97.0    96.9   105.8    109.3   115.2
High           97.2   102.0   104.7   105.2   102.9   109.3    118.4   125.8
Range           8.3    14.0    20.3    22.5    16.5    11.9     15.5    19.1
Std. Dev.       2.6     4.5     5.7     5.3     4.1     3.7      4.3     4.7

 

If you'd like to request some processed GEARS data, please send me a DM.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

This is one takeaway:

Irons           A1      A2      A3      A4      A5
Average        92.0    91.8    90.6    90.2    91.9

Drivers         A1      A2      A3      A4      A5
Average        93.6    94.3    93.8    94.6    94.7

There's not much tilt from 1-5, even with the driver.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 hours ago, iacas said:

This is one takeaway:

Irons           A1      A2      A3      A4      A5
Average        92.0    91.8    90.6    90.2    91.9

Drivers         A1      A2      A3      A4      A5
Average        93.6    94.3    93.8    94.6    94.7

There's not much tilt from 1-5, even with the driver.

This is basically what my coach told me when I first went on GEARS. I had way too much axis tilt. He had me feeling like I was leaning forwards to get me back to close to vertical. It’s also interesting that some of them are actually tilted that way fairly significantly especially at the top of the backswing. It’s really A6 before the hips are meaningfully closer to the target than the shoulders. 
 

Thanks for pulling this together!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Ty_Webb said:

This is basically what my coach told me when I first went on GEARS. I had way too much axis tilt. He had me feeling like I was leaning forwards to get me back to close to vertical. It’s also interesting that some of them are actually tilted that way fairly significantly especially at the top of the backswing. It’s really A6 before the hips are meaningfully closer to the target than the shoulders. 

I plan to put a little video together on "spanning" the golf ball or "the good kind of flip".

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Here are these averages visually:

 

axis_tilt_irons_driver.jpg

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
4 minutes ago, John T said:

Can you do a chart showing there relationship of distance to the amount of tilt?  Thanks.

could but it's not going to show you anything. The R^2 value would be darn near zero, and these aren't all swings from 2022. Some are from 2016, 2018… etc.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Set up position tends to be the most consistent between better players (lower St. Dev.). I wonder what the comparison in rate of axis tilt change is between different points. Like, if a golfer sets up with axis tilt of 90 versus someone with 96. Does the 96 try to lose axis tilt at a faster rate? Maybe the rate of axis tilt change is more consistent between better players. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1091 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.