Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1354 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Everyone,

I am looking for a recommendation for a new set of clubs for my junior golfer.  He has been using a Hot Launch Junior set meant for 64-67" tall, but he has recently grown to 68" tall (5' 8").  He's about 11 and a half and loves the sport, but is not to the point where he really needs a full set at this point.

I was trying to figure out how to static fit him into a set of lightweight clubs similar to his junior set, but it s a bit of a challenge as there are not really junior options at his height.

When statically fitting him, his wrist to floor without shoes was 32" and his wrist to fingertip for grip size is 7.5".  Looking this up on the net he would need -0.75" and needs a ladies or senior flex to make sure the clubs are still flexible for his junior stature.  There's US Kids golf clubs available in a 66-69 height range, but I'm concerned with those as they are the most expensive Tour Series and he's going to outgrow those in about a year.

Any recommendations are appreciated!

Best Regards,

Dan

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golf is expensive. I understand your hesitance to get the US Kids Tour Series. You might as well look at the 2nd hand market for senior flex standard length clubs. And here's what i'd look. Cobra makes a very good product, but they do not hold their value on the second hand market. They do more now than they used to since Bryson has a sponsorship, but still not as much as Callaway, Ping, and Titleist. 

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

You could go with ladies beginners clubs instead. Still lightweight and and built shorter, to about the spec’s you need. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thank you both @DrvFrShow and @phillyk for your input!  I was looking at the ladies club options as well, but noticed my wife's set was about the same size as his current junior set. 

I measured his irons and his Tour Edge junior set has a SW (34.5 length), a 9/P (35 length), and a 7/8 (36 length).  The SW is about .75 shorter than a men's Tour Edge SW and if you average the men's 7/8, its about an inch shorter.

So with that info, I'm currently looking at a couple of options:

Stay put for a while longer until I can gather some more info.

See if there's a way to add .5" to his current irons if they make small enough shaft extenders for this, leave the hybrid and woods as-is.

Buy the largest junior SW, 9i, and 7i I can find at a golf store if they are in the length I am looking for (about a half inch shorter than men's standard).  Or build the 3 irons using components with lighter heads and appropriate flex shafts (like Hireko Golf).

Buy a junior or ladies set if I can find them around the specs I am looking for, or pick up something used.

I appreciate all of the input!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Just to follow up, I ended up with going with a new Tour Edge Bazooka 370 box set with senior flex graphite shafts.  I took the kid to the golf store over the weekend and he managed to hit the adult sized clubs just fine.  I stuck with the senior set as he still hasn't figured out how to swing hard under control, so the graphite shafts with some flex should help.   The Tour Edge clubs look a lot like his junior clubs, so they have some familiarity to him.  Thanks everyone for the advice.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1354 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yea, I think it is just human nature. It could be subconscious as well.  The studies on Belief Perseverance, Cognitive Dissonance, Confirmation Bias, Motivated Reasoning are all interesting topics in psychology.  Being that people are probably on a spectrum regarding how susceptible they are to these behaviors; I am not shocked by his response. It helps me cope with this sort of thing as well. I am like; Oh, they can't help it. Honestly, they probably can't with out some sort of major pattern changes in how they process information. I wish, I would be like 80-lbs lighter than I am now! 🤣 I am glad the GEARS avatar doesn't blow up in size to match the person's outline.       
    • Hasn't happened yet but there's a lot of smoke now, I guess.
    • Nailed that one right on the head. Force the data to match the theory, not the other way around. Come on people!
    • Andy Plummer (@andy_plummer) • Instagram photos and videos 32 likes, 3 comments - andy_plummer on April 15, 2026: "Rory Mcilroy. What do you see? 2 images of the same player. Masters Champion Rory Mcilroy. One is a still photo from a video, the other Is an AVATAR from a... The text is: Rory Mcilroy. What do you see? 2 images of the same player. Masters Champion Rory Mcilroy. One is a still photo from a video, the other Is an AVATAR from a 3D system of the same player. The 3d system AVATAR fails to represent the reality of the trail shoulder, arm, or wrist position. Or much else for that matter. This raises the question, Which is a more accurate representation of reality the still photo or the cartoon? Next, To demonstrate the value of systematically comparing still photos I have included 2 images of Rory to train your eyes. Is the trail shoulder the same? The trail arm? The trail wrist? :sigh: I love when people think they’re punching back, but they’re just punching themselves in the face. The rest of this post is a compilation of some text conversations. 😄  Andy, and all of S&T have, for years now sought to diminish the role of measurement tools in the game. Whether that's force plates, 3D, perhaps HackMotion, etc., they continue to rely on their interpretations of 2D photos and video to "show" what the game's best players do. In reality, they do very little of what S&T teaches, and often do the exact opposite of what S&T teaches. With the post above, Andy continues to find new ways to demonstrate his stupidity. With this post, he's effectively comparing… a 2D photo to a 2D photo of a 3D avatar. GEARS owners/users know… it's not about the avatar. It's about the numbers, the measurements, etc. GEARS doesn't capture your exact body dimensions. The trail elbow has been a little goofy for a long time. But you can compare one swing to another, and compare the data. And the data continues to show that golfers do not move like S&T or Andy Plummer insist that they move. Either Andy doesn’t know that, which is a big concern, or he’s lying about what he’s saying. Andy is essentially saying that no numbers are good because no avatar will match his random still image. Who can blame him? The last time Andy tried to use numbers, we got… stuff like this: How do S&T "network" folks and GEARS owners like Manavian and Sales feel about being pooped on by their "leader"? How will Andy (or will he at all) moonwalk this one back with them? How do GEARS users use GEARS? To get the numbers, to compare the numbers. Occasionally you can compare a "before" avatar against an "after" avatar, but in those cases, you know the "camera angles" are perfect and, more importantly, consistent or uniform. With GEARS Hybrid, too, you can put the numbers right on the actual person. My two color cameras are pretty close to FO and DL views, so… I see the pretty common angles. Other times, you're just looking at the data, and the avatar is "just for show." To put that together: The GEARS Avatar is a representation. Occasionally you compare the “before” avatar to the “after” avatar, and you can rest assured when doing that the camera angles are perfect and consistent… but that it’s more about the measurements and data/numbers. I'm reminded of this quote: It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It (or variations at the link). It doesn't fit perfectly, because outside of a shrinking band of devotees, S&T has a horrible reputation amongst golfers and golf instructors. It likely has more to do with a desire to "be right" than to "get it right." And a healthy dose of good old-fashioned stupidity. I hate poor golf instruction. It grinds my gears, no pun intended. It works against what I've spent the last nearly 20 years of my life doing: helping golfers to play better golf. I hate it when people do not advance their knowledge. They dig in, insist that they "got it right" fifteen years ago, and ignore all advances in technology. They keep their heads in the sand and reject everything that doesn't match what they think they saw years and years and years ago. They don't adapt or grow. They make up "data" and hold golfers back from getting better. It's sad, and frustrating as a golf instructor trying to help golfers to battle the misinformation put out by the stubborn and ignorant. And… that's enough time spent on this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.