Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1214 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm currently playing with my Mizuno MP-25 PW which I don't hit much unless I need a full swing around 110 yards or have a really specific short chip.  It's got a decent amount of wear on the face and I don't hit it consistently with partial swings so I usually reach for my 52° Vokey SM7 instead.  I also have a repeatable 50-60 yard shot with it.  My other wedge is a 56° cleveland tour something-or-other from about 2001 that I love.  I'm eying a 50° to somewhat replace the PW and also be more consistent with partial swings and more useful for chipping, but I'm also wondering how much difference there really is in a 48° PW and a 50°.   If there's some sort of article/guide that can help me, that would also be appreciated.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The main issue I'm seeing is gapping. The 50° and 52° would be very close, with probably too much overlap, especially on full swings. It seems to me like the 52° is doing a pretty good job for you already for what you want the 50° for. I would recommend looking for another 48° to have consistent gapping. Unfortunately I don't have ready access to any guides or anything, but I'm sure if you search for wedge buying guide something will pop up. 

  • D1-SIM MAX D 9° Diamana pd 50 reg lofted down 1 click 
  • D2-SIM MAX D 10.5° project x riptide cb 50 reg lofted up 2 clicks
  • 5w- Radspeed motore f3 
  • 3H- Tour Edge Exotics e722 kbs hybrid stiff
  • 4-5h tour edge exotics ex9
  • 6-AW- Cleveland launcher xl Nippon Zelos 7
  • 56°-Cleveland CBX Zipcore
  • P-Odyssey eleven tour lined slant neck

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, roejye said:

The main issue I'm seeing is gapping. The 50° and 52° would be very close, with probably too much overlap, especially on full swings. It seems to me like the 52° is doing a pretty good job for you already for what you want the 50° for. I would recommend looking for another 48° to have consistent gapping. Unfortunately I don't have ready access to any guides or anything, but I'm sure if you search for wedge buying guide something will pop up. 

That's a good point, I should just replace the pitching wedge, I treat it like an extra-short iron, not a wedge and I feel like I could use something longer than the 52° that I'm confident playing with a wedge swing.  I don't think I have the attack for a 60° which would be the other way I could go.

Also "wedge" no longer looks like a real word after all this repetition.

Edited by barooo
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As said, knowing your gaps is important.  I use my PW and GW primarily as if they are #10 and #11 irons, but I also know a quarter shot (sort of, I'm really not doing a lot of full swing stuff when I make a "quarter shot" with these) distance ranges from my 58 through my 8-iron.  

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

@barooo I have a set of MP25s.  Unless you’ve had the lofts adjusted, the PW loft is 46 degrees.  If you do have the standard 46 degree loft, I’d recommend a 50 degree GW.  When I was playing them, my 50 degree Vokey gapped perfectly with the PW.  From there, you can dump the 52.

The other option could be to bend your 52 to 51, then you’d have a 5 degree gapping between PW, GW, SW

Edited by Denny Bang Bang
Bend 52 to 51
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

The other option could be to bend your 52 to 51, then you’d have a 5 degree gapping between PW, GW, SW

Hey Denny, as I'm sure you know, "gapping" your set doesn't just mean choosing equal steps in the loft of the clubs. Gapping is referring to the distance gaps. Gapping is getting the correct gaps in how far you hit said clubs. It's not uncommon that many people will have a greater difference in distance between how far they hit a 56 and how far they hit a 54 than the difference in distance gap between how far they hit their 45 and their 50 degree clubs. 

This kind of thing may also occur at the top of the bag as well. 

When "gapping" your set, go off of the DISTANCE you hit your clubs not off what is stamped on them. Then if you are constantly coming up with a distance you cannot hit or perhaps cannot comfortably hit, you may need to find a club for that distance as well. 

I also know many golfers who carry two wedges of similar (not the same but within 2 degrees) lofts, but have different bounces. Therefore they do different jobs. But that might be outside the scope of what the OP is asking. 

But in general @barooo you want to seek nice consistent "distance" gaps, don't worry as much about consistent "loft" gaps. (Although, obviously loft plays a role in distance.) ... See, this is why golf and club selection discussions are so much fun. 👍😁👍

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:


But in general @barooo you want to seek nice consistent "distance" gaps, don't worry as much about consistent "loft" gaps. (Although, obviously loft plays a role in distance.) ... See, this is why golf and club selection discussions are so much fun. 

I think the main "gap" in my clubs I'm feeling is something I'm confident doing wedge things with (half shots, chips, etc.) that has a consistent half-shot distance over about 50-55.  Inside about 55 or so I feel pretty confident and 90-115 I feel pretty confident.  I could also work on a second partial swing that's a little more than arms to parallel so I have 3 stock shots (including full-ish swing) instead of just two.  I'm not sure if my PW is 46° or 48°, I just googled the specs for MP-25 PW.  Maybe my issue more with the grind/bounce aspect.  Or maybe it just has really dull grooves, the face isn't in great shape (got the set used a few years ago and that was the only club with any real wear when I got them).

Also I'm in no real rush here I'm just sort of thinking about what I should get next.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@ChetlovesMer yea, I agree with you that I used “gapping” two different ways, so it may have been confusing.  But the intention was distance gapping.  Having played the MP25 personally, the 50 degree Vokey fits right in with the 46 degree MP25 from a distance gapping perspective.  With that, I’m sure bending the 52 to 51 will work out reasonably well.  Maybe some people do, but I’ve never met anyone who carries a GW in anything other than a typical fairway grind.

Folks can certainly get as extreme as they want on all of this.  Shafts of course make a difference as well.

First thing first, the best advice is probably to work on flighted shots before even worrying about gapping from a club perspective.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Lol guess what I did when I played about a month ago...  I left my 56° at the course.  Just noticed today when packing up for a lesson, the first since playing...  So I guess my more immediate problem is getting another 56° to replace the missing one.  The really funny part is the last time I played this course (Harborside near Chicago) I left the same club behind, but realized it and went back the next day.  Extra mad because it was the first club I bought (my initial set was a gift) myself.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1214 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.